Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • A legitimate question can a asked by intellectually dishonest person under intel

    A legitimate question can a asked by intellectually dishonest person under intellectually dishonest conditions for intellectually dishonest reasons. No engagement with intellectually dishonest people. So have some honest person ask.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 23:43:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098367589020037121

    Reply addressees: @Johnonnn @DataDistribute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098363405772173313


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098363405772173313

  • We don’t deal with intellectually dishonest people. However answers on FB. We wi

    We don’t deal with intellectually dishonest people. However answers on FB. We will answer anyone else who asks.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 23:23:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098362527833116677

    Reply addressees: @Johnonnn @DataDistribute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098361821097091073


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098361821097091073

  • Well, unfortunately you can’t make an argument. Need to watch Molly some more. l

    Well, unfortunately you can’t make an argument. Need to watch Molly some more. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 22:50:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098354307580207104

    Reply addressees: @Johnonnn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098353101059313665


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098353101059313665

  • well, we can, but that’s a technical discussion that I find is better for people

    well, we can, but that’s a technical discussion that I find is better for people who have some skil in econ, philosophy, law, and physics.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 19:27:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098303083476471808

    Reply addressees: @SomeAccountMan @HHBenedictXVII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098301287324700672


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098301287324700672

  • You Cannot Appropriate P or Climb on P’s Bus in Defense of Your Lying.

    February 20th, 2019 10:31 AM

    —“I think he is saying that you are gossip rallying yourself in this instance and that it is relatively well placed on the irony scale.”—Jay Thompson

    I thought RECIPROCITY was moral. And that ‘he’ is using pilpul to create a false equivalency between argument vs argument and ridicule vs ridicule. Which is sophistry or dishonesty or ignorance, or stupidity. THE ARGUMENTATIVE PROCESS If ridiculed, return it, and then restate the central argument. If that process doesn’t return to argument, repeat. If repetition doesn’t work, the return to violence. Never let GSRRM go unanswered. Identify it. Return it. Restate the central argument. (inform thru repetition) Repeat. Hardly requires restating the central argument with Kinsella. THERE IS NO ROOM ON THE BUS FOR LIES This is why I don’t see hope for y’all. You are all dependent upon the use of avoidance of the central argument like women, jews, and muslims, which demonstrates that christianity is a vehicle for the deceits of women, jews, and muslims and therefore you cannot ‘earn the franchise’ by reciprocity of truthful speech. Every time you make one of these childish bits of nonsense all you do is confirm: you are not able to evolve past that level of infantilism we equate to women and children or that level of dishonesty we call abrahamism. So please stop wasting my time. We cannot cooperate, because we cannot agree to reciprocity, and we cannot agree to reciprocity because we cannot agree to truthful speech that would end abrahamic deception in supernatural, ideal, sophomoric, and pseudoscientific terms, that gave us judaism, christianity, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism, using the very means of fraudulent discourse you are using with me. It’s not complicated. Just not worth talking about. Xians must find a way on their own. I can’t help those who are allies of the enemy. And christians are allies of the enemy of our people. Because christians are more allied to jews, christians, and muslims than they are to their people, their science and their law and their history. Solve your own problem. There is no ride on P for christians in alliance with the enemy on the preservation of lying. Truth is my way and the original way of our people before the dark ages of abrahamic ignorance and submission. Find your own way. There is no way of appropriating P in defense of lying.

  • You Cannot Appropriate P or Climb on P’s Bus in Defense of Your Lying.

    February 20th, 2019 10:31 AM

    —“I think he is saying that you are gossip rallying yourself in this instance and that it is relatively well placed on the irony scale.”—Jay Thompson

    I thought RECIPROCITY was moral. And that ‘he’ is using pilpul to create a false equivalency between argument vs argument and ridicule vs ridicule. Which is sophistry or dishonesty or ignorance, or stupidity. THE ARGUMENTATIVE PROCESS If ridiculed, return it, and then restate the central argument. If that process doesn’t return to argument, repeat. If repetition doesn’t work, the return to violence. Never let GSRRM go unanswered. Identify it. Return it. Restate the central argument. (inform thru repetition) Repeat. Hardly requires restating the central argument with Kinsella. THERE IS NO ROOM ON THE BUS FOR LIES This is why I don’t see hope for y’all. You are all dependent upon the use of avoidance of the central argument like women, jews, and muslims, which demonstrates that christianity is a vehicle for the deceits of women, jews, and muslims and therefore you cannot ‘earn the franchise’ by reciprocity of truthful speech. Every time you make one of these childish bits of nonsense all you do is confirm: you are not able to evolve past that level of infantilism we equate to women and children or that level of dishonesty we call abrahamism. So please stop wasting my time. We cannot cooperate, because we cannot agree to reciprocity, and we cannot agree to reciprocity because we cannot agree to truthful speech that would end abrahamic deception in supernatural, ideal, sophomoric, and pseudoscientific terms, that gave us judaism, christianity, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism, using the very means of fraudulent discourse you are using with me. It’s not complicated. Just not worth talking about. Xians must find a way on their own. I can’t help those who are allies of the enemy. And christians are allies of the enemy of our people. Because christians are more allied to jews, christians, and muslims than they are to their people, their science and their law and their history. Solve your own problem. There is no ride on P for christians in alliance with the enemy on the preservation of lying. Truth is my way and the original way of our people before the dark ages of abrahamic ignorance and submission. Find your own way. There is no way of appropriating P in defense of lying.

  • I’ll do a clarifying post. thank you for the suggestion

    I’ll do a clarifying post. thank you for the suggestion.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 18:09:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098283496752246784

    Reply addressees: @SomeAccountMan @HHBenedictXVII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098280926067466241


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098280926067466241

  • I thought I was terrible. So thanks

    I thought I was terrible. So thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 17:19:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098270871876194305

    Reply addressees: @h0b0spic3s

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098251694578774016


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098251694578774016

  • “Remember to read “politics” in the first line of Curt Doolittle’s posts as “the

    —“Remember to read “politics” in the first line of Curt Doolittle’s posts as “the silly, irrelevant kayfabe that passes for national politics in the USA today”.—William Frisby


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 15:34:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098244490719043584

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 13:53:00 UTC