Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • Danny, IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and failure

    Danny,

    IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and failure of institutions being near and dear to my heart.

    RE: https://www.academia.edu/38466999/Are_Institutions_Created_by_Collective_Acceptance?

    CONTEXT QUESTION

    0. Could be a little more ‘bold’ in the abstract, because the question you are trying to answer is relevant to the urgent present condition – abstract under rates the argument? My understanding is that you consistently address the arguments of other authors in proper academic fashion, but do you tie your work back to general theory, or general arguments? Or do you intend your audience to interpret each paper in a vacuum rather than as a collection of your works in defense or advocacy of a theory?

    ANSWERED QUESTION

    1. Attributing greater agency to people than they have? (not sure if this is answered)

    2. Do institutions(producers) rules (products) and actions (services) fulfill a market demand or fail to fulfill a market demand? (answered)

    3. Is the failure to fulfill a market demand due to (a) contrary to demand, (b) limiting demand, (c) assisting demand? (answered)

    UNANSWERED QUESTION

    5. Do you mean to say that status is assigned or that institutions can provide a vehicle for signaling by virtue of either the coercive power delivered to their members or success at competing within the limits of those coercive powers?

    6. Is the market demand determined by Moral Intuitions (group strategies), Ethical Intuitions (Organizational Strategies), or Generational, or Gender intuitions (strategies)?

    7. Are the Neocon, Marxist, Libertarian, Postmodern, Feminist movements made possible by temporary economic windfalls from hydrocarbons, the industrial and technological revolutions lasting only until asymmetry of underclasses and technology is ameliorated by regression to the mean? And is that the underlying conflict?

    8. Are we not only discovering that this luxury makes females and males diverge in demonstration of genetic interests (rather than converge as the left anticipated), but that groups within empires and nation states are seeking expression of genetic interests generating unresolvable conflict of interest?

    9. What equilibrium must be established to move in any given direction from existing intellectual, narrative, economic, political, social, and familial orders?

    10. Is there any value of scale, or (as in the ancient world) do we regress to the mean and decline slowly in order to preserve what we perceive as benefits of institutional and political scale?

    thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 09:19:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 14:01:00 UTC

  • “…a primate of our overall brain volume…” sigh. And doesn’t mention ratio. .

    “…a primate of our overall brain volume…” sigh. And doesn’t mention ratio. … Not only with his outside voice. Not only in writing. Not only in published writing. But in a journal. And the profession wonders why we ridicule its members regularly.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 13:19:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101472031378456577

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101109227827982337


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Humans pride themselves too much on their purportedly extra large cortex, which really isn’t such a big thing, psychologist complains. https://t.co/r6UEP0Cob3 https://t.co/TFC2OcERxt

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101109227827982337

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53084598_10157020137832264_263703139

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53084598_10157020137832264_2637031399151894528_o_10157020137827264.jpg Via @[525087895:2048:James Santagata]

    (humor)James SantagataIt was Darren O’Connor. 😂Mar 1, 2019, 9:23 AMDarren O’ConnorOh, I can’t take credit for it…just a humble sharer.Mar 1, 2019, 9:40 AMJames SantagataOne of the best ones this year!Mar 1, 2019, 10:05 AMMartin ŠtěpánHigh mutational load. People ugly on the outside are likely to be ugly on the inside too, despite everything we’re being told. It’s actually the whole reason we perceive them as ugly in the first place.Mar 1, 2019, 10:18 AMMark Di RussoLiterally a Roman neckbeard. I’d not be surprised if he shared their sexual proclivities too.. 😏Mar 1, 2019, 10:35 AMJB BurnsNero looks like hes part of the Odoyle family in Billy MadisonMar 1, 2019, 10:52 AMAlain DwightGuy who ordered Seneca to kill himself would be a neck beard.Mar 1, 2019, 12:37 PMNathan McLaughlinJames LynchMar 1, 2019, 1:54 PMPatrick SmythMark Di Russo pretty sure he did…Mar 1, 2019, 2:38 PMNick HeywoodBoth have been accused of Satan 🙂

    Will the real Satan, please stand up?!?!Mar 1, 2019, 5:40 PMChristian WarwickVery Cro-magnon features.Mar 1, 2019, 6:19 PMBrendan McGlynnJeff SevercoolMar 1, 2019, 6:50 PMBen FrayleGreatest Artistic Genius in Human History. World champion poet, dramatist, musician, wrestler, chariot racer. … everything he did he was the best. Sort of like the Howard Hughes of Ancient Rome.Mar 1, 2019, 7:27 PMMarko KlaicFed trying to be funnyMar 4, 2019, 5:32 AMVia James Santagata

    (humor)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:23:00 UTC

  • full workup

    full workup. https://propertarianism.com/2012/02/07/what-is-evil/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-28 20:40:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101220686268452866

    Reply addressees: @cstamu09

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101219174523854849


    IN REPLY TO:

    @cactusstack

    @curtdoolittle What is the Propertarians’ metaphysical definition of evil?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101219174523854849

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52896753_10157019016252264_254172488

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52896753_10157019016252264_254172488

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52896753_10157019016252264_254172488085274624_o_10157019016237264.jpg See?Jarrod MarmaBut Martin said biological testing on subgroups is immoral. SAD!Feb 28, 2019, 7:03 PMPattern Principle’Eco-‘ the prefix of both ecology and economics is not by mistake. Economy is ecology, as ecology is economy. The etymological definition of eco is ‘house’ – so Propertarians are merely getting our house in order, so to speak.Feb 28, 2019, 7:04 PMOliver CrokeFrank Sandberg wrote a paper on this.Feb 28, 2019, 8:37 PMCurt Doolittleon what?Feb 28, 2019, 8:47 PMOliver CrokeHe wrote about the principle of innate self healing/organisation of human bodies and explained the nature of the principle with reference to Austrian economics if I remember it correctly (was a few years ago).Feb 28, 2019, 8:50 PMMartin ŠtěpánJarrod Marma I don’t make moral statements. I’ve said you wouldn’t get away with it because controlled breeding and keeping for scientific purposes is something that is not looked kindly upon when done to humans.Mar 1, 2019, 12:59 AMMartin ŠtěpánReplication, variation, markets (competition, selection, transaction) and evolution in everything.Mar 1, 2019, 4:24 AMDan WarrenAre we cleaning our rooms?Mar 1, 2019, 6:59 AMMoritz BierlingCleaning every room (discipline) until the entire house (system of systems) is in order.Mar 1, 2019, 9:00 AMJarrod MarmaWhat does that mean entirely? CRISPR experiments seem to be popping up regularly in the news. The entire reason we have cold weather training information is due to human experimentation. I’m sure surgical experience originated similarly from vivisections. “Not looked kindly upon” is a vague platitude.Mar 1, 2019, 9:23 AMSee?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-28 18:46:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53092798_10157018934782264_420947053

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53092798_10157018934782264_420947053

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53092798_10157018934782264_4209470530249555968_o_10157018934772264.jpg (Thank you)Vaughn Roberts(Good shit)Feb 28, 2019, 5:53 PMMartin ŠtěpánMy thinking has actually been simplified by all of this and various disciplines began to merge. I can’t tell where’s the line between evolutionary biology and economics. Or rather, I don’t think there is one.Feb 28, 2019, 6:12 PMLuke WeinhagenLike distillations resulting to ever greater potencyFeb 28, 2019, 6:59 PM(Thank you)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-28 17:52:00 UTC

  • WE DON”T SELL PROP., WE SELL APPLICATIONS OF PROP. —“if we wish for P to grow

    WE DON”T SELL PROP., WE SELL APPLICATIONS OF PROP.

    —“if we wish for P to grow and become widespread we have to make it attractive to many people – not just a niche group of westerners.”—

    Agreed. But we don’t’ sell P, we sell application of p, any more than we sell programming languages rather than programs that do stuff.

    P serves as a programming language for social orders.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-28 13:00:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52967919_10157016244837264_302449536

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52967919_10157016244837264_302449536

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52967919_10157016244837264_3024495362590113792_o_10157016244822264.jpg Bill JoslinBoom!Feb 27, 2019, 11:01 AMJoseph E. PostmaFN bastards. FN waste of 2000 years! As if this and all Abrahamic religion need to continue existing.Feb 27, 2019, 12:22 PMEric GroseAn eloquent, elegant surgical strike…Feb 27, 2019, 12:37 PMFrancesco PrincipiAmenFeb 27, 2019, 12:50 PMNick HeywoodI love an articulated F U 😁Feb 27, 2019, 1:22 PMAndrew ClaytonUshers in a dark age and is now lead by a man who’ll sell out all their foundational principles to keep a hostile media off his back.

    Same old culprits.Feb 27, 2019, 4:01 PMSteven J. WoronIs this an eye exam?Feb 27, 2019, 5:50 PMStephen ThomasAbsolutely perfectFeb 27, 2019, 8:07 PMWilliam L. Benge.

    This Italian is a clueless impish prick. Not for his pedestrian stance on Constantines Intel Agency (church)(unthinking fks) but for his matriarchal jibberish. Is no one going to prosecute this man?

    This guy must’ve adored HRC then. No doubt. Fail.

    Was Alexander this daft? Or the Macedonian Generals? Efficacy. Win.

    Were our North men so daft? Efficacy. Win.

    Was any Roman General? Efficacy. Win.

    Matriarchal novelty over wisdom? Fail.

    History and wisdom mean nothing? Fail.

    We must seek only efficacy, for the win.Feb 28, 2019, 9:57 AMAndrey SokoloffThe Chruch was a force for division when Europe needed unity and it is a force of subversion when we need traditionalism today. Always on the wrong side of history.Mar 2, 2019, 3:16 PMAndrey Sokoloff80% homosexual. Let that sink in.Mar 2, 2019, 3:17 PMWilliam L. BengeAffirmative (times three) ;)Mar 2, 2019, 3:18 PMAndrey SokoloffI asked my mother to read me the Bible when I was 5. I was utterly disgusted with that horrid Jewish philosophy. If I as a child could see it as morally false, how come adults cannot?Mar 2, 2019, 3:18 PMCurt DoolittleAgreeableness increases suggestibility.

    We tend to have lower agreeableness which requires external decidability.Mar 2, 2019, 3:20 PMAndrey SokoloffSince it was USSR, my mother was not there to “explain” the Buy-bull stories. Read “as is”, it is horrific and a real insight into Jewish mind and character.Mar 2, 2019, 3:23 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-27 10:56:00 UTC

  • Funny as hell. nonsense criticism, but funny as hell. laughed all the way thru.

    Funny as hell. nonsense criticism, but funny as hell. laughed all the way thru. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-27 03:40:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100601601776074752

    Reply addressees: @MrKennan1948

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100558112019369984


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AmirBrandon7290

    @curtdoolittle https://t.co/jY7cofW1xx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100558112019369984