Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 14:59:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 14:59:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53055632_10157022816182264_7214570804078444544_n_10157022816177264.jpg Attacking my intolerance as arrogance only serves to demonstrate my arguments.Alex BrocklehurstI’ve never understood those who play the arrogance card. Why not simply stand on the merit of one’s own arguments?
I get blocked regularly because folk just do not wish to have sustained engagement. They say “you always have to be right” – which is disingenuous, because they would not venture a view themselves if they did not think they were right.
People who engage others by pointing out ‘character flaws’ should be ignored. They demonstrate that they have little to offer.Mar 2, 2019, 3:35 PMLee C WaaksAlex: “My apologies for not changing my mind on the spot to suit your sensibilities.”Mar 2, 2019, 4:28 PMAlex BrocklehurstHey Lee! How you doing? :-)Mar 2, 2019, 4:29 PMAlex BrocklehurstAs in, since our meet up online with Ray Scott Percival..Mar 2, 2019, 4:33 PMJohn KellyDon’t know if this is appropriate but here goes: “And all these Men gathered upon high buildings, through the cold of night, locked arm in arm with blood in their eyes and fire in their veins; academe had never seen such terrible conviction…as they took back the campuses – Hundreds NO, Thousands bellowed before the long nailed Cowards of our time…In complete syncronization they cried aloud: IN-TOL- ER-ANCE! IN-TOL-ER-ANCE! …. The deep male voices shook the earth and never had our enemies felt the full iron weight of their most feared opponent: THE TRUTH…the takeover of truth and those willing to die for it to be crowned King once more… would never be stopped!”
Intolerance, gentleman!Mar 2, 2019, 11:58 PMHolly Morrigan”intellectual arrogance” = I have a dismal vocabulary.Mar 3, 2019, 11:28 PMAttacking my intolerance as arrogance only serves to demonstrate my arguments.

Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 14:42:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 13:05:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53557098_10157022546302264_2028617743728640000_n_10157022546297264.jpg FAKE HATE CRIMES LIST.
LINK: http://FakeHateCrimes.OrgRafael AureliusNovember 2016 showed record hate crime hoaxes.
Can we buy some call options set to expire in December of 2020?Mar 2, 2019, 5:13 PMFAKE HATE CRIMES LIST.
LINK: http://FakeHateCrimes.Org/

Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 12:21:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53316612_10157022496292264_8522809252505452544_n_10157022496287264.jpg It Isn’t Rare.JWarren PrescottNo more lies…. For me, this is the biggest attraction to Propertarianism.Mar 2, 2019, 12:02 PMCurt Doolittleeach of these would be criminally prosecutable and we would enjoy it.Mar 2, 2019, 12:02 PMRafael AureliusFakehatecrimes.orgMar 2, 2019, 12:05 PMCurt Doolittleit’s blocked by fb I think.Mar 2, 2019, 12:05 PMWilliam L. BengeRacketeers need the racks.Mar 2, 2019, 12:08 PMWilliam L. BengeUnleash Libel law.Mar 2, 2019, 12:10 PMRafael AureliusIt’s not blocked, click it. The link preview is just messed up. That website is a treasure trove.Mar 2, 2019, 12:12 PMErik LukovskyDisgracefulMar 2, 2019, 12:25 PMWayne WaltonTribal Exodus Government Judges rule harshly against the False Accusers. Those who falsely witness capital crimes are stoned.Mar 2, 2019, 12:29 PMWayne WaltonTribal Exodus Government Judges rule harshly against the False Accusers. Those who falsely witness capital crimes are stoned.Mar 2, 2019, 12:29 PMWayne WaltonCurt Doolittle Tribal Exodus Government Judges rule harshly against the False Accusers. Those who falsely witness capital crimes are stoned.Mar 2, 2019, 12:30 PMJWarren PrescottWayne Walton – sometimes witch doctors get results.Mar 2, 2019, 12:46 PMTim Beckley-SpillaneDemand is greater than supply.Mar 2, 2019, 12:52 PMWayne WaltonJWarren Prescott Pharaoh thought he was GOD too. Defining good and evil. That’s like fighting gravityMar 2, 2019, 1:04 PMMartin ŠtěpánIt’s incentivized, same as false rape accusations. MRAs have a made a similar effort: http://register-her.netMar 2, 2019, 3:52 PMIt Isn’t Rare.

Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 11:59:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53513205_10157022435202264_3552883477957312512_o_10157022435187264.jpg Serg GioBalls + Brains make allMar 3, 2019, 6:07 AMJameson Blackwell>influence
no one knows who you are.
>strategy
ramming telephone poles and shooting transformers is not a strategy. 200 mile wide hurricanes crush the electrical grid of Florida every year and the lights are back on in a few days. As of yet, no separatist militias have formed from the lack of electricity.Mar 3, 2019, 9:14 AMCurt DoolittleHurricane’s don’t shoot first responders, or linemen, or warn first responders and linemen that they’ll be shot. Hurricanes in one region draw resources from other regions. Enough hurricanes and that won’t happen.Mar 3, 2019, 12:03 PM

Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 11:29:00 UTC
http://amzn.to/2CDBzj7
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 10:41:00 UTC
https://www.academia.edu/…/Are_Institutions_Created_by_Coll…Danny Frederick,
IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and failure of institutions being near and dear to my heart.
RE: https://www.academia.edu/38466999/Are_Institutions_Created_by_Collective_Acceptance?
CONTEXT QUESTION
0. Could be a little more ‘bold’ in the abstract, because the question you are trying to answer is relevant to the urgent present condition – abstract under rates the argument? My understanding is that you consistently address the arguments of other authors in proper academic fashion, but do you tie your work back to general theory, or general arguments? Or do you intend your audience to interpret each paper in a vacuum rather than as a collection of your works in defense or advocacy of a theory?
ANSWERED QUESTION
1. Attributing greater agency to people than they have? (not sure if this is answered)
2. Do institutions(producers) rules (products) and actions (services) fulfill a market demand or fail to fulfill a market demand? (answered)
3. Is the failure to fulfill a market demand due to (a) contrary to demand, (b) limiting demand, (c) assisting demand? (answered)
UNANSWERED QUESTION
5. Do you mean to say that status is assigned or that institutions can provide a vehicle for signaling by virtue of either the coercive power delivered to their members or success at competing within the limits of those coercive powers?
6. Is the market demand determined by Moral Intuitions (group strategies), Ethical Intuitions (Organizational Strategies), or Generational, or Gender intuitions (strategies)?
7. Are the Neocon, Marxist, Libertarian, Postmodern, Feminist movements made possible by temporary economic windfalls from hydrocarbons, the industrial and technological revolutions lasting only until asymmetry of underclasses and technology is ameliorated by regression to the mean? And is that the underlying conflict?
8. Are we not only discovering that this luxury makes females and males diverge in demonstration of genetic interests (rather than converge as the left anticipated), but that groups within empires and nation states are seeking expression of genetic interests generating unresolvable conflict of interest?
9. What equilibrium must be established to move in any given direction from existing intellectual, narrative, economic, political, social, and familial orders?
10. Is there any value of scale, or (as in the ancient world) do we regress to the mean and decline slowly in order to preserve what we perceive as benefits of institutional and political scale?
thanks.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 10:36:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 09:47:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 09:46:00 UTC