Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549735389 Timestamp) TOTAL NUMBER OF SPENCER MENTIONS IN MY DB (there is one more I remember doing a grid of alt right classes) I don’t punch right unless a punch is thrown first. But start a fight with me and my position is ‘defeat an enemy completely and permanently’ Here is my position and it has been my position since at least 2016. And before 2016 I thought politics wasn’t worth my time. — EXCERPT OF POSITIONING STATEMENT 01.29.2017– Here. Look how many ‘languages’ we are speaking in now: Spencer is working on WN, (wn) The green frog crew is working on ridicule. (alt) RamzPaul is working on pop criticism (alt) PJW is working on media criticism. (new) Moly is working on pure education. (lagging but getting there) Mike is working “within the system” (new) I’m working on ‘the next system’. (new) This movement covers the spectrum from separatism, to ridicule, to criticism, to education, to reformation, to revolution. And covers the classes from lower working to intellectuals. And that’ exactly what we NEED to do. No everyone is capable of the full spectrum of understanding or the full spectrum of arguments. The middle will, and the lower middle will, always hold the numbers, and provide the upper middle provide leadership. The bottom provides the soldiers, and the top provides the political solutions. THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION. We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your believe in what can be accomplished. Some within the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine —-PACK LANGUAGES VS HERD LANGUAGE— The Herd All Speaks the Same Language. the Packs Don’t. JULY 22, 2018 The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack. Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary. And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass. And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism. So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight. So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all. The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t. —MENTIONS OF SPENCER— Note that in every case it is either respectful or I’m sharing a post by someone else that is general interest that merely mentions him. SHARED Feb 3, 2019, IN RESPONSE TO SPENCER https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156961844687264 SHARED Dec 29, 2018, 12:28 AM RESPONSE TO SPENCER/MARK https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156880177817264 SHARED: Apr 17, 2018, 7:29 AM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156293552552264 SHARED Jan 14, 2018, 9:55 AM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156039108437264 SHARED Mar 18, 2017, 2:55 PM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155141283657264 SHARED Jan 29, 2017, 8:26 AM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154982642257264 JAN 28th 2017 VIA CERNOVICH https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154982642257264

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549746173 Timestamp) POSITION ON “THE MYTH OF 20TH CENTURY” —“Have you read Alfred Rosenberg’s “The Myth of the 20th Century”? If so, what’s your opinion?”— A Friend It’s in my reading list. I have come to the same conclusion (although I didn’t know of this but until a year or two ago). I agree with it entirely. My understanding of the cycles of history is similar. I consider Mein Kampf and MT20C required reading for this reason. And if I could find someone to teach MK, MT20C, MacDonald, Goldberg (The Fatal Embrace), by emphasis on these cycles of history and the Conflict of Civilizations, then I would do so. I think the war between semites and europeans continues unabated, and that while we held them off for 1500 years, reasonably well, their chances of winning by population replacement are still significant. The problem is separating the story of history, the problem itself, from the nazi ideology – which was possible at a certain time and place but such ‘ideology’ no longer has rather ignorant folk one generation from the fields to take root in.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549744557 Timestamp) @Victor Blanc Well, I mean: —“Lacking better alternatives, I’d become NatSoc/Fascist if it meant survival, and with the exception of Propertarianism, not much else is being provided (or at least popularised) in way of solutions.”—Victor Blanc That’s my argument as well. “Show me something better.”

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549742755 Timestamp) SHOW PREP – J.F. Gariepy WHY OPEN DISCOURSE IN PUBLIC? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975600062264 THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975353527264 TOTAL MENTIONS OF SPENCER https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975165307264 THE LANGUAGES OF MALE PACKS https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975183877264 WHY TALK OF REVOLT, REVOLUTION, CIVIL WAR? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975175932264 LEGIT CRITICISM OF PROP https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975105752264 ANOTHER LEGIT CRITICISM OF PROP https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156971446347264 MOST LEGIT CRITICISMS OF PROP https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156811437002264 ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS FOR SUPREMACY? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155415610782264

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549742098 Timestamp) THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE I’m not listed anywhere by anyone in any canon, registry, article, or map as ‘alt right’. I didn’t want to be associated with the alt right. I tried the moniker New Right but Paul Joseph Watson started using it, and I hadn’t TM’d it so I lost that one. I can sympathize with the alt right as a movement of justifiably dissatisfied young men, copying Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals and making use of new technology to achieve against the left with the interet what the left achieved with media against the rest of us. And I’m “On The Right” in the sense that I’m a conservative libertarian (sovereignty, and private property) – which makes me a rule-of-law rightist rather than an authoritarian or religious rightist. In my ideal world we have a rule of law by natural law, an independent judiciary, an hereditary monarchy, professional ministers, some set of class based houses of veto allocated by random selection, and something that would look very much like intolerant nationalism in the interwar french and german model. If that sounds like fascism, it’s simply extremely intolerant anglo monarchy under rule of law. John Mark has made us very popular very fast. Faster than we had ever imagined. Because his message sells, and he’s a hell of a smart guy, with media ready personality, and quality writer and producer. People of good character sell by their nature. People of poor character do not sell because of their nature. John is a man of good character and his message sells accordingly. ATTENTION DEFICIT DESPERATION DISORDER The current round of criticism is driven by Josh Jeppeson (Imperius) > Dylan Thomas (TruDilTom) and Dylan’s cohost (I won’t name) > Richard (Dicky) Spencer. Josh recruited Moritz Bierling, [name removed] and Joel Davis from my followers. Young smart guys with great promise but lacking skin in the game (family, career, biz) a need for aesthetics – which means “secular religious zeal”. And some of these folks attempted to stir conflict with me and those people who work with me. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ABOUT YOUNG SMART MEN Those without agency or responsibility in a sphere of influence(family, social, economic, political, military) generate demand for authority whether intelligent or dim, knowledgeable or ignorant. And they do so by means that they can participate in: sophism, supernatural sophism, economic sophism and pseudoscience and political pseudoscience and sophism. Because passion (emotion), persuasion(sophism), and pretense of knowledge, is all that they have to work with. And as with any market product ‘there is a sucker born every minute’ for every grammar of advocacy and persuasion. Each of us demonstrates a moral intuition a grammar of advocacy, argument, and resistance, and these demonstrations reflect our sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value. In other words, our moral intuitions reflect our reproductive strategies; our method of argument reflect those reproductive strategies. Each of us demonstrates at every single moment our sexual social economic, political, and military value with every expression gesture, display, dress, word, and deed – with humans working very hard to signal falsehoods: children their value in association, and women notoriously their youth, and men notoriously their future potential to the pack. So as a result we see the dim pursue religion, the less dim secular spiritualism or the occult, the less dim framing and sophism, the less dim pseudoscience. But those with agency, in a sphere of influence, with assets, relations, knowledge, and experience, simply use truth and utility, and rather than inspire, or persuade, they provide rational incentives for possible practical means of operating the familial, social, economic, political, and military order. Everything you want to know about an individual can be determined by his means of advocacy, argument, and resistance. Grammars of argument, just like vocabulary, are insights into the operations of the human mind. And there exist a limited number of NON CORRESPONDENT grammars to work with just as there are a limited number of personality traits. Megan Usui was an insider advising and promoting me. Unfortunately she was backchannel working with Jeppeson – I love her but good intentioned people are easily fooled. I think they concocted some idea of uniting the hard right. Of “bringing us all together”. Something ‘undesirable’. But Jeppeson is a sociopath and coat-tail rider. He tried to do something himself and couldn’t’. Tried to ride my coattails. And yes, I’m too tolerant of human pound puppies, but you know, after the tenth rage-quit and death threat, even the most tolerant of people disconnect and keep you at arm’s length. Megan worked up the meeting in NY with me Duchesne and Macdonald. Jeppeson spent the entire summer trying to convince megan that I couldn’t do it for some reason and that he should instead. (laughable.) Then another death threat, this time in public, on voice chat. I threatened to turn him into cops. It worked and he got quiet for a bit. Spencer is desperate for relevance, and the rest of the ‘leadership’ so to speak has simply ignored him. However, we are the rising stars and will be able to reach far larger numbers than the ‘alt right’, because we are selling a portfolio of solutions that will produce right, libertarian, and centrist ends, at the sole expense of the very bottom and very top – and natural incentives and pressures will do the rest. The secret to collapsing a dam or a fortress wall, is to weaken it and let the natural gravity of the environment do the work for you as a consequence. A good way of capturing attention is to undermine the competition. This is the strategy of female proxy for violence: undermining. Women gossip, shame, ridicule, rally,moralize (“GSRRM”), and they do so to hold back competitors rather than to to provide opportunities superior to those of competitors. Evidence suggests that the origin of language has as much to do with GSSRM to control alphas and redistribute control of reproduction as it does for hunters to communicate – when hunting is an almost entirely silent occupation. (The counter is that whenever GSSRM is used against you, retaliate with it, then repeat the central point. Use each volley GSSRM as a means of promoting your central point and thesis, and simply wear out the other party’s reliance on GSSRM. Over time people learn that GSSRM “hats are empty” so to speak. This takes patience but it always succeeds.) Dylan seemed interested in P, but I’m guessing was pursued Jeppson, who then rode Dylan’s coattails and rage crashed their group at some point but I don’t know if he still does. He’s riding Richards coattails now, and Jeppeson’s a lot smarter than Spencer. (God knows Spencer’s not smart enough to comprehend my work. What did he accomplish other than being the poster child for what NOT to do?) So Richard makes a good sock puppet for Jeppeson who is hoping to make Spencer relevant again. Despite the fact that Richard is selling inspiration to empty halls and was only relevant as a whipping boy for the press. Jeppeson and Dylan were pitching a somewhat novel version authoritarian postmodernism by combining a bit of pseudoscience and sophism. (Like Derrida, social construction, and therefore authoritarianism.) And it’s going nowhere for obvious reasons. But there are suckers born every minute and suckers for sophism are everywhere, just as suckers for passion, supernaturalism and pseudoscience are everywhere. So these guys, who have never accomplished anything in life – not even so much as a family, career, or small business but have grandiose visions of themselves and their understanding of the world (despite lack of evidence) are merely pursuing self interest – not our group interests. In this sense, in hindsight I almost wish the deplatforming was more successful so that bad I deas could not be funded so easily by donations from those susceptible to each non-correspondent grammar of persuasion. And so between two sock puppets and a sociopath we undrestand the scramble for relevance – the desperate cries for attention. GOING MAINSTREAM We (our folks) have tried the direct message (constitutional change desirable by the majority of our people) with the only method anyone thinks will work (mass resistance, uprising, or conflict) and given that the people are frustrated, they are buying the message because of it. They’re buying it because It isn’t a message about ‘follow me’. Or a message of handwaving. It’s a message that we have the power to alter the course of events if we choose, and we have an actionable plan of change that will restore our laboring working and middle classes at the expense of the financial, media, and political classes, and end the redistribution of our reproduction to invaders. Now this might not work. But it is the only deal on the table at the moment that isn’t evangelism, hand waving, woo, or unmarketable – and it’s certainly open to improvement and revision. LEAVE THEM BEHIND The irrelevant get left behind, because they deserve to be. But we should not expect the irrelevant to continue to disappear without desperately trying to preserve the attention they garner. One bad apple spoils the whole movement. Richard is irrelevant and poisonous to our success, and Jeppeson is just sociopath and cancer and always has been. The rest are probably well intentioned cerebral young men without any agency or experience seeking ideals as substitute for sphere of influence (family, business etc). “CLEAN OUR HOUSE FIRST” (so to speak) -Curt Doolittle

    -The Propertarian Institute

    People Mentioned in this post: – Richard Spencer – Josh Jeppeson (alias Josh Jeppson, “imperius”) – Dylan Thomas (TruDilTom) – Joel Davis ( Joel Davis )

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549735651 Timestamp) WHY CALLS FOR REVOLUTION AND CIVIL WAR —“Can you explain this call to violence, revolution, or civil war?”—Justin Ptak If enough people talk about it the general discourse changes sufficiently to discuss alternatives to the status quo.) Same as ‘the best way to prevent a war is to be ready to crush any opponent easily at all times”. The best way to bring an opponent to the negotiating table is the certainty (lower risk) that it is better than the alternative.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549735389 Timestamp) TOTAL NUMBER OF SPENCER MENTIONS IN MY DB (there is one more I remember doing a grid of alt right classes) I don’t punch right unless a punch is thrown first. But start a fight with me and my position is ‘defeat an enemy completely and permanently’ Here is my position and it has been my position since at least 2016. And before 2016 I thought politics wasn’t worth my time. — EXCERPT OF POSITIONING STATEMENT 01.29.2017– Here. Look how many ‘languages’ we are speaking in now: Spencer is working on WN, (wn) The green frog crew is working on ridicule. (alt) RamzPaul is working on pop criticism (alt) PJW is working on media criticism. (new) Moly is working on pure education. (lagging but getting there) Mike is working “within the system” (new) I’m working on ‘the next system’. (new) This movement covers the spectrum from separatism, to ridicule, to criticism, to education, to reformation, to revolution. And covers the classes from lower working to intellectuals. And that’ exactly what we NEED to do. No everyone is capable of the full spectrum of understanding or the full spectrum of arguments. The middle will, and the lower middle will, always hold the numbers, and provide the upper middle provide leadership. The bottom provides the soldiers, and the top provides the political solutions. THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION. We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your believe in what can be accomplished. Some within the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine —-PACK LANGUAGES VS HERD LANGUAGE— The Herd All Speaks the Same Language. the Packs Don’t. JULY 22, 2018 The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack. Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary. And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass. And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism. So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight. So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all. The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t. —MENTIONS OF SPENCER— Note that in every case it is either respectful or I’m sharing a post by someone else that is general interest that merely mentions him. SHARED Feb 3, 2019, IN RESPONSE TO SPENCER https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156961844687264 SHARED Dec 29, 2018, 12:28 AM RESPONSE TO SPENCER/MARK https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156880177817264 SHARED: Apr 17, 2018, 7:29 AM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156293552552264 SHARED Jan 14, 2018, 9:55 AM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156039108437264 SHARED Mar 18, 2017, 2:55 PM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155141283657264 SHARED Jan 29, 2017, 8:26 AM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154982642257264 JAN 28th 2017 VIA CERNOVICH https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154982642257264

  • (FB 1549747544 Timestamp) HOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS (Do not treat all our p

    (FB 1549747544 Timestamp) HOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS (Do not treat all our people as equal in agency.)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549746173 Timestamp) POSITION ON “THE MYTH OF 20TH CENTURY” —“Have you read Alfred Rosenberg’s “The Myth of the 20th Century”? If so, what’s your opinion?”— A Friend It’s in my reading list. I have come to the same conclusion (although I didn’t know of this but until a year or two ago). I agree with it entirely. My understanding of the cycles of history is similar. I consider Mein Kampf and MT20C required reading for this reason. And if I could find someone to teach MK, MT20C, MacDonald, Goldberg (The Fatal Embrace), by emphasis on these cycles of history and the Conflict of Civilizations, then I would do so. I think the war between semites and europeans continues unabated, and that while we held them off for 1500 years, reasonably well, their chances of winning by population replacement are still significant. The problem is separating the story of history, the problem itself, from the nazi ideology – which was possible at a certain time and place but such ‘ideology’ no longer has rather ignorant folk one generation from the fields to take root in.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549742755 Timestamp) SHOW PREP – J.F. Gariepy WHY OPEN DISCOURSE IN PUBLIC? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975600062264 THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975353527264 TOTAL MENTIONS OF SPENCER https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975165307264 THE LANGUAGES OF MALE PACKS https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975183877264 WHY TALK OF REVOLT, REVOLUTION, CIVIL WAR? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975175932264 LEGIT CRITICISM OF PROP https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975105752264 ANOTHER LEGIT CRITICISM OF PROP https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156971446347264 MOST LEGIT CRITICISMS OF PROP https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156811437002264 ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS FOR SUPREMACY? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155415610782264