(FB 1549593473 Timestamp) —“I honestly very disappointed in a lot of the bad faith critics from the AltRight of Propertarianism though. I have not seen one decent or constructive argument against from any of its figure heads.”— Imperium That’s because there isn’t a good argument other than “You don’t give us an ideology, a philosophy, or religion for inspiration – you give us law, policy, and political, social, economic and financial reform. And we (w/o agency) want inspiration.” (But, people with agency want results.) I’m not sure it’s bad faith. I think it’s just immaturity and ignorance.
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549552255 Timestamp) —“Incorporate intolerance into everyday interactions with people, with a smile.”—Art Roddam
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549678135 Timestamp) Um. I teach intolerance for sophism, idealism, pseudoscience and supernaturalism, and radical intolerance for GSRM, pilpul, critique. Why would you expect me to be tolerant of those forms of argument. I mean, of course I come of as intolerant and prosecutorial – it’s my fking JOB. lol… damn….
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549596343 Timestamp) (I don’t get it. Don’t they teach third worlders not to look down the barrel? I mean, that’s what? Like five guys in two weeks? )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549594490 Timestamp) —“Those without solutions will often demean those who offer them. It’s a form of intellectual weakness and (worse) dishonesty. Especially when you try to use”spirituality” or other such trite to hide your inadequacy. These “men” are pathetic and useless. They destroyed the massive ground swell of momentum the Alt-right garnered.They don’t want solutions. Solutions are what men do. They want to bitch and moan. Like the effeminate “leaders” they are.”—Stephen Thomas
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549678135 Timestamp) Um. I teach intolerance for sophism, idealism, pseudoscience and supernaturalism, and radical intolerance for GSRM, pilpul, critique. Why would you expect me to be tolerant of those forms of argument. I mean, of course I come of as intolerant and prosecutorial – it’s my fking JOB. lol… damn….
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549596343 Timestamp) (I don’t get it. Don’t they teach third worlders not to look down the barrel? I mean, that’s what? Like five guys in two weeks? )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549594490 Timestamp) —“Those without solutions will often demean those who offer them. It’s a form of intellectual weakness and (worse) dishonesty. Especially when you try to use”spirituality” or other such trite to hide your inadequacy. These “men” are pathetic and useless. They destroyed the massive ground swell of momentum the Alt-right garnered.They don’t want solutions. Solutions are what men do. They want to bitch and moan. Like the effeminate “leaders” they are.”—Stephen Thomas
-
(FB 1549747544 Timestamp) HOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS (Do not treat all our p
(FB 1549747544 Timestamp) HOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS (Do not treat all our people as equal in agency.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549746173 Timestamp) POSITION ON “THE MYTH OF 20TH CENTURY” —“Have you read Alfred Rosenberg’s “The Myth of the 20th Century”? If so, what’s your opinion?”— A Friend It’s in my reading list. I have come to the same conclusion (although I didn’t know of this but until a year or two ago). I agree with it entirely. My understanding of the cycles of history is similar. I consider Mein Kampf and MT20C required reading for this reason. And if I could find someone to teach MK, MT20C, MacDonald, Goldberg (The Fatal Embrace), by emphasis on these cycles of history and the Conflict of Civilizations, then I would do so. I think the war between semites and europeans continues unabated, and that while we held them off for 1500 years, reasonably well, their chances of winning by population replacement are still significant. The problem is separating the story of history, the problem itself, from the nazi ideology – which was possible at a certain time and place but such ‘ideology’ no longer has rather ignorant folk one generation from the fields to take root in.