Why do you feel capable of making those assertions? What has convinced you that despite your lack of demonstrated achievement you should hold any opinion other than an open mind that seeks to understand rather than to claim competency sufficient to disagree?
The framework I’m using is first principles, meaning the irreducible first causes that originate all variations in human beings. I can and have (repeatedly) discussed them here and elsewhere.
There are only a handful of those dimensions that humans vary by. After that it’s just intelligence and exposure to ideisyncratic experience.
In fact we can distinguish the sexes in written or spoken words with an absurdly small number of words, and profile a personality with no more than a few hundred.
All words are measurements. Every one of those measurements consists of at least six or seven dimensions of other measurements. Combining them together tells us everything significant about those dimensions necessary to categories your biases whether sex, moral, age, culture, religion and much more.
The field is called computational linguistics.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @sacrifice31605 @WalterIII
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 20:19:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793376197411479553
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793373478168772900