yes
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 04:22:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793497694394323423
Reply addressees: @Lughedd
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793494346534432801
yes
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 04:22:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793497694394323423
Reply addressees: @Lughedd
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793494346534432801
PUTIN. USA. IRONY. 😉 https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1793463953495851363
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 02:47:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793473878821601674
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1793463953495851363
You mean the long list I posted a bit ago, right in this thread, that covered every aspect of russian condition? lol
Read. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 02:33:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793470268368949601
Reply addressees: @LuxdBo @elonmuskADO
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793440561954713907
(yes) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 02:31:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793469835818766762
Reply addressees: @MaxwellMianecki
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793463624297787781
Matter of degrees, but sure. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 01:32:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793454972895473990
Reply addressees: @hudsondrums93 @elonmuskADO
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793451997879795844
(Very good. Yes.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 01:32:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793454837738189246
Reply addressees: @FatherIsTalking @Timcast
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793454148366823484
12. symbols: five, five, and two.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 21:23:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793392322702368786
Reply addressees: @elonmuskTN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792985181508321662
Nope. it’s evidence that well meaning men can misunderstand one another but still come to terms and seek to understand. ;). I mean, I’d rather we convince people of that more so than any other point. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 20:45:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793382663832650158
Reply addressees: @sacrifice31605 @WalterIII
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793378753764376660
I can invest in you if you have patience.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 20:20:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793376294320886042
Reply addressees: @sacrifice31605 @WalterIII
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793374029610668229
Why do you feel capable of making those assertions? What has convinced you that despite your lack of demonstrated achievement you should hold any opinion other than an open mind that seeks to understand rather than to claim competency sufficient to disagree?
The framework I’m using is first principles, meaning the irreducible first causes that originate all variations in human beings. I can and have (repeatedly) discussed them here and elsewhere.
There are only a handful of those dimensions that humans vary by. After that it’s just intelligence and exposure to ideisyncratic experience.
In fact we can distinguish the sexes in written or spoken words with an absurdly small number of words, and profile a personality with no more than a few hundred.
All words are measurements. Every one of those measurements consists of at least six or seven dimensions of other measurements. Combining them together tells us everything significant about those dimensions necessary to categories your biases whether sex, moral, age, culture, religion and much more.
The field is called computational linguistics.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @sacrifice31605 @WalterIII
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 20:19:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793376197411479553
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793373478168772900