Brilliant. https://twitter.com/Outsideness/status/1187223919188512768
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 14:35:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187377024861704192
Brilliant. https://twitter.com/Outsideness/status/1187223919188512768
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 14:35:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187377024861704192
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/75010622_491870861409809_742597895563247616_o_491870858076476.jpg PLS DON’T WASTE MY TIME OR OTHERS WITH BLDG7 CONSPIRACY THEORY
(Yes I know more that you do – as usual )
The primary lessons are:
(a) as usual, only one structural member failed, leading to the cascade, and the structural failure was due to accumulation of heat over many hours. The external damage had no effect on the collapse. It was just the fire.
(b) engineering standards and calculations for steel structures were too loose given the possible duration of fires.
(c) ordinary office combustibles provide long term sources of heat at slow burn necessary to accumulate heat in structural members.
(d) if the sprinklers had been active it’s unlikely the combustibles would have been able to produce accumulated heat, and therefore sprinklers must not be dependent upon external sources of pressure and power in the event of a catastrophe. ie: external infrastructure is a weak link not a discount, and structures must meet closer to greek standards (10x max expected load) than the max load calculations at present, and harmonics make the matter far worse. Make buildings more expensive and there will be fewer of them, and better. Require resident ownership in urban centers and end rental income. Expand underground transport, police the cars aggressively, and if necessary create class -based cars requiring escalating positive behavior.
(PS: Why do you think I know that a civil war punishing urban areas is so easy to win? Anyone overloading emergency services in any urban area will succeed. Multiple urban areas cannot provide mutual support under adverse conditions. Without communication and data, organization of response is all but impossible -bottlenecked.)PLS DON’T WASTE MY TIME OR OTHERS WITH BLDG7 CONSPIRACY THEORY
(Yes I know more that you do – as usual )
The primary lessons are:
(a) as usual, only one structural member failed, leading to the cascade, and the structural failure was due to accumulation of heat over many hours. The external damage had no effect on the collapse. It was just the fire.
(b) engineering standards and calculations for steel structures were too loose given the possible duration of fires.
(c) ordinary office combustibles provide long term sources of heat at slow burn necessary to accumulate heat in structural members.
(d) if the sprinklers had been active it’s unlikely the combustibles would have been able to produce accumulated heat, and therefore sprinklers must not be dependent upon external sources of pressure and power in the event of a catastrophe. ie: external infrastructure is a weak link not a discount, and structures must meet closer to greek standards (10x max expected load) than the max load calculations at present, and harmonics make the matter far worse. Make buildings more expensive and there will be fewer of them, and better. Require resident ownership in urban centers and end rental income. Expand underground transport, police the cars aggressively, and if necessary create class -based cars requiring escalating positive behavior.
(PS: Why do you think I know that a civil war punishing urban areas is so easy to win? Anyone overloading emergency services in any urban area will succeed. Multiple urban areas cannot provide mutual support under adverse conditions. Without communication and data, organization of response is all but impossible -bottlenecked.)

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 11:51:00 UTC
“GSRRM” RESPONSE
—“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer
It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491528644777364&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 04:19:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187222032653672448
I don’t make errors. Ever. It’s my job not to.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 04:17:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187221595032576000
Reply addressees: @meta_slayer @RenegadePlayboy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187221527982460928
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@meta_slayer @RenegadePlayboy It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise, baiting in to hazard, profiting from that hazard, and defending it with pilpul, critique, & pretense of innocence under cover of voluntary choice.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187221527982460928
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@meta_slayer @RenegadePlayboy It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise, baiting in to hazard, profiting from that hazard, and defending it with pilpul, critique, & pretense of innocence under cover of voluntary choice.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187221527982460928
I don’t do stupid. Don’t waste my time. And don’t engage in fraud by misrepresentation of the properties of a financial instrument. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 03:55:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187215941811294208
Reply addressees: @defrost94
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187208485680930816
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187208485680930816
sent via pm. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 01:56:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187186123178684417
Reply addressees: @hunderkoch @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187185472331636737
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187185472331636737
MORE FUN WITH CHRISTIANS
—“Darwin doesn’t even agree with macro evolution. DNA, the eye, Cambrian explosion all disprove any macro evolution not to mention that species actually show just as much entropy as positive gains over time just look at how many useless dogs exist today. To pretend things get better and more organized over time is simply false.”—Charles Schiavo
Did you just try to make sense? Because you didn’t. I’m perfectly able to narrate, almost without checking first, the history of the development of the eye, in at least the two times it evolved. I don’t know how many times blood evolved but I know of two. Darwin didn’t know about DNA, but we do, that’s no argument. DNA merely explains why Darwin was right (massive parallelization, niche exploitation, favoring nothing but increased complexity. The Cambrian explosion is the result of bottlenecking, creating opportunity, increase in oxygen levels increasing available energy – particularly by increasing surface area, and the cliff effect of a new generation of genetic grammars making possible more rapid evolution. So, Energy Density > Entropy > fundamental structure(Tetrahedron?) > fundamental forces > quantum fields > particles > atoms > chemistry > biochemistry > biology > neurons > memory > sentience > consciousness > language > calculation. The same applies for the complexity of biochemical constructions, especially proteins, which function as mechanical devices at the molecular level whose changes in state are powered by changing of charges produced by attachment and detachment of molecules. So there was a Cambrian explosion just as there was a bronze age, steel age, science age, and technological age, and now computational age revolution. Just as the first generations of stars contained little, but made the higher elements, and distributed them through explosion, and laying the seeds for the development of future permutations upon those elements. In evolutionary biology this is called ‘punctuated equilibrium’ where there are periods of explosive growth due to some particular innovation. For example the Indo europeans conquered much of Eurasia in no small part because they developed the ability to drink milk, giving them 40% more calories for the same effort of production. The same for business, economic, state, and civilizational cycles. The entire universe follows the same simple rules from it’s most basic foundations through our most complex inventions.
And what on earth would make you think you’re smart enough, knowledgeable enough, intellectually honest enough to make such an argument when the greatest minds of our age make the opposite.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 23:44:00 UTC
January Cold is the Optimum Time To Act. The Entire Chicago -to -NE region gone.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 22:09:00 UTC
—“No compromise. No Debate. Those ships have sailed.”—Griff Draycott
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 21:31:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187119466796195841
Well, you’re asking for help in the best way possible. 😉 I’ll help you however I can. Yes the learning curve is steep but the value of “OMG now I get THIS TOO!!’ experience never ends. Ask Bill. It really is like the scientific revolution for psychology, sociology, politics.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 19:00:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187081484726878208
Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187077105219231744
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187077105219231744