Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

https://apnews.com/ae4a51ba65154d9eb3926f35e9fd3114AND READ THIS – AND LEARN

https://apnews.com/ae4a51ba65154d9eb3926f35e9fd3114Updated Oct 24, 2019, 9:50 PM

WE HAVE A NEW SMART GUY 😉

—“You’re not the first person I’ve encountered for whom Hans-Hermann Hoppe was the capstone that raised them from intelligent libertarian to dissident right. Sovereigntarianism is the best fleshed-out dissident right philosophy, with perhaps the only real competitor being Nick Landian Dark Enlightenment/accelerationism. But the latter is far more, shall we say, “Continental,” in its nature and outlook. Someone should go to school and smuggle these ideaspheres into academia—upload these right proper dangerous thought viruses straight into the Cathedral’s mainframe. One appealing to spergs like us, and Landianism appealing to schizos. In fact, I may do that myself.”—Duke Newcomb

OUCH (KINSELLA)

—“I should probably inaugurate The Libertarian Theory Podcast. I know it would be poplar. And I don’t even want to make money. So no ads. But then, why bother. Nevermind.”—Stephan Kinsella @NSKinsella

Libertarianism is a sedating pseudo-moral sophism for those to ignorant, weak and cowardly, to organise militarily to create rule of law by reciprocity,under demonstrated interests, enumerated as property, and to insure it equally, producing a condition of sovereignty. Liars all.

—“So, you’re in favor of aggression? Hitting innocent people in the head with bricks, for example? Or not? Just to be clear.”—Stephan Kinsella @NSKinsella

I can’t tell if you’re trolling, intellectually dishonest, or overlooking the obvious. How can one claim action in defense of, and retaliation for, ir-reciprocity, is an aggression? How can one construct a condition of sovereignty and reciprocity, otherwise? Wishful thinking?

Reciprocity: Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, Free of imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated interests of the others by externality. This describes all property possible, not just intersubjectively verifiable, or subjective.

Which is how Rothbard, in typical fashion, leaves the door open for voluntary, but otherwise ir-reciprocal parasitism, by such means of blackmail, baiting into hazard, the sufficiency of volition alone, despite externalities, and plausible deniability of having done so.