The P Constitution Isn’t a Request for Approval https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/the-p-constitution-isnt-a-request-for-approval/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:31:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228341018673733633
The P Constitution Isn’t a Request for Approval https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/the-p-constitution-isnt-a-request-for-approval/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:31:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228341018673733633
I Don’t Do Hate and Don’t Need To. https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/i-dont-do-hate-and-dont-need-to/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:31:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228340938470236167
Women using P Against GSRRM https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/women-using-p-against-gsrrm/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:22:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228338637198286848
Feb 13, 2020, 2:38 PM by James Dmitro Makienko [M]y wife is an aspie, and she is in a fashion industry, which is rife with GSRRM. She tried everything, until she “read Doolittle” (c) and learned some P-concepts. Mainly she uses a meta-term “manipulation” as a catch-all for GSRRM and other feminine cognition shit they use. She calls them out on manipulation. They usually respond with more GSRRM. Then she says “you are using ORRGSM+M(manipulation) to manipulate me into going against my interests, and I am not falling for it”. Then they try it again. She repeats herself and adds “and since you use manipulation, instead of logic and reason, you are a bad person, with a dark agenda, who is trying to take me for a fool, but I am not falling for it”. She keeps repeating it until manipulators run away – when you expose them they run out of options they can use. She also read up on dark triad traits on manipulative behaviors of sociopaths and narcissists and found things like “Framing” – (“if you are a good girl/christian/X you will do Y and go against your interests to serve my interests”) which are also used with GSRRM. Calmly exposing manipulative tactics with a precisely defined technical term works for her to disarm those who use GSRRM.
Feb 13, 2020, 2:38 PM by James Dmitro Makienko [M]y wife is an aspie, and she is in a fashion industry, which is rife with GSRRM. She tried everything, until she “read Doolittle” (c) and learned some P-concepts. Mainly she uses a meta-term “manipulation” as a catch-all for GSRRM and other feminine cognition shit they use. She calls them out on manipulation. They usually respond with more GSRRM. Then she says “you are using ORRGSM+M(manipulation) to manipulate me into going against my interests, and I am not falling for it”. Then they try it again. She repeats herself and adds “and since you use manipulation, instead of logic and reason, you are a bad person, with a dark agenda, who is trying to take me for a fool, but I am not falling for it”. She keeps repeating it until manipulators run away – when you expose them they run out of options they can use. She also read up on dark triad traits on manipulative behaviors of sociopaths and narcissists and found things like “Framing” – (“if you are a good girl/christian/X you will do Y and go against your interests to serve my interests”) which are also used with GSRRM. Calmly exposing manipulative tactics with a precisely defined technical term works for her to disarm those who use GSRRM.
Is Propertarianism a Completion of the Hegelian Project? https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/13/is-propertarianism-a-completion-of-the-hegelian-project/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:20:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228338331173478400
CURT: UNDONE
=========
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/206449687419859
==================
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/204852640912897?comment_id=205594074172087&reply_comment_id=206750814056413¬if_id=1581642235521526¬if_t=feed_comment https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/204852640912897?comment_id=205594074172087&reply_comment_id=206750814056413¬if_id=1581642235521526¬if_t=feed_comment
=================
QUESTION
From Jennifer Dean
—“My background taught me to view everything in terms of personal risk and responsibility. In other words, if you choose to take the risk, you have to take the responsibility for the outcome and just live with it (regardless of whether others were deceptive, made false promises, caused harm, etc.) It seems like that mindset is a big part of what made this country what it is, for both good and ill, and people hold on to that very strongly because they equate it with liberty. They don’t want to ban things that are harmful, or hold others accountable for deceit or coercion because they think it all comes down to personal choice.”—
—“It puzzles me because it’s hard to see how P can work on a practical level in everyday life, when so many people operate in a way that places personal choice above reciprocity. I sense that many advocate for it out of selfishness, or a punitive attitude towards those they perceive as selfish or stupid.”—
—“But I think there’s also a very traditional view among conservatives that the world has to be this way because God judges in the afterlife and until then we just have to turn the other cheek.”—
—“Conservatives and liberals both tend to believe education is the answer. But with the increasing complexity in the world, no one can be smart enough or educated enough to have full informed consent in every decision they make.”—
—“It seems like a big cultural shift is needed before people will understand the real need for reciprocity.”—
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 13:15:00 UTC
RT @Steve_Sailer: Compare my review of Charles Murray’s “Human Diversity” to the New York Times’ review at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/books/review-human-diversity-charles-murray.html?searchResultPosition=1
https:/…
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 01:07:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228123647870717953
just what we needed. thank you. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 16:31:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227993808589250561
Reply addressees: @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227816131798470657
IS THIS THE SHORT DESCRIPTION OF P?
—“This the best thing I have seen as a short answer on P.”—Frank ChandlerUpdated Feb 13, 2020, 3:43 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 15:43:00 UTC