What Does White Mean? https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/28/what-does-white-mean/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 15:12:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233409654866182150
What Does White Mean? https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/28/what-does-white-mean/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 15:12:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233409654866182150

😉 https://t.co/snLCQ3mMzj

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 14:42:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233402215546654725
Reply addressees: @Sov3r3ignSoul
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233358622454734851
The Pursuit of Non-False Religion https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/28/the-pursuit-of-non-false-religion/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 14:42:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233402037666222081
Wrong analogy. IRA.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 02:52:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233223448077447168
Reply addressees: @NISquadron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233222625331208192
Same. Exasperating.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 00:18:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233184596495405056
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 @WillReturns1066
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233184041794506752
Precisely.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 00:05:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233181464210132992
Reply addressees: @ArielFelidae @JohnMarkSays @WillReturns1066 @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233181325747802113
KM: Is there any individual or group that maintains a list of these ‘hostiles’?
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 00:00:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233180148582756352
Reply addressees: @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233061639890432000
Stefan Molyneux vs Vaush Video
(omfg. Molyneux has far too much tolerance for dishonesty)
1) Wealth is the result of increasing productivity in time. Increasing productivity in time is achieved by reducing labor in time, first by a division of labor, se… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VW25QZs5AoU
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 23:48:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233177107892756481
THen why are you talking? That’s what we say.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 23:44:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233176096255959048
Reply addressees: @WillReturns1066 @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233175747075821568
—“No he’s not, he’s offering support to eugenics. It’s not scientifically, ethically, or socially valid AT ALL. Go read some bioethics.”—Dr Julie Blommaert @drjulie_b
Julie you are a typical product of the feminist postmodern pseudoscience movement. (a) Eugenics would work. (b) So would many other things we don’t do. Even genocide works – it’s the most effective historical means of evolutionary competition. We don’t do it. SO STOP LYING. We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs. So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry. What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom? Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means. People like you are a cancer for mankind.