Exactly – I Do My Thing. Use P for Your Purposes https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/exactly-i-do-my-thing-use-p-for-your-purposes-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:08:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265842460149891072
Exactly – I Do My Thing. Use P for Your Purposes https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/exactly-i-do-my-thing-use-p-for-your-purposes-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:08:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265842460149891072
May 23, 2020, 12:42 PM
—“…There are more diplomatic leaders in the Prop movement, besides Curt…. Just let Curt do his thing (law)…don’t ask him to be a politician, or a theologian, or even be less cranky and autistic- he’s not interested, or able, frankly. Take what you can from the methodology and form your own tribe, then use this to get what you want out of this movement.”— Shannon Constantine
May 23, 2020, 12:42 PM
—“…There are more diplomatic leaders in the Prop movement, besides Curt…. Just let Curt do his thing (law)…don’t ask him to be a politician, or a theologian, or even be less cranky and autistic- he’s not interested, or able, frankly. Take what you can from the methodology and form your own tribe, then use this to get what you want out of this movement.”— Shannon Constantine
May 24, 2020, 10:09 AM
—-“Stop your Nietzscheanism. At least Christianity allows for forgiveness and cancel culture don’t. “We are all sinners,” don’t forget that.”—Haniel @HanielAzzi
Cancel Culture (marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and difference-denialism) are just christianity v2: undermining meritocracy, reason, evidence, and testimony by replacing the false promise of life after death with the false promise of equality after replacement. Cancel culture is just the strategy of women to undermine, just as christianity is the strategy of women to create social constructions. This is because women are fearful because their bodies evolved to supply fetuses rather then muscles and speed, they’re nervous systems evolved to include their offspring, and verbal ability a discount on manipulating children. And because of these adaptations they’re physically weaker, and emotionally neurotic, but verbally superior, and so they compete as they can by manipulation, using the positive range of seductions: feeding, caring, nurturing, and informing, and the negative spectrum of disinformations: approval and disapproval vs truth or falsehood, half truth vs complete truth, undermining vs debate, resistance and advocacy vs boycott and cooperation, short term devotion vs persistent loyalty. There are no gods, no heaven, no sins. Only myth, evolution, and crimes. Crimes of violating physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by acts of irreciprocity in display, word, or deed, that resist our evolution into the gods we imagined by truth, science, technology and markets. We are the only gods that may yet be. And in the test of civilizations, only western man discovered the laws of the universe and adapted their civilization to mirror them. If there were gods, europeans would be the chosen people, Aristotle their prophet, and truth their scripture. Christianity is the religion of false promise, ignorance, deceit, manipulation, en-serfment, poverty, and the dark ages, that asks women, slaves, and the weak, to submit to a false god, of an alien people, who produced nothing except lies, usury, rent seeking, and organized crime. Simple people need lies and social construction to reinforce them against insecurities, worries, stresses, slights, signaling, and status pressures in order to sedate their neuroticism from the pressures of low status and low agency – providing the illusion of understanding and control. It is sufficient for them, just as fairy tales are for children. To say we all need mindfulness: personal, interpersonal, social, political, and metaphysical is nothing more than to state we need to limit the cost of a neural economy frustrated by incalculability of status in the chaos outside the life of the hunting-gathering tribe. To say that pagan ‘religion’, aryan, stoic, epicurean values solved the problem of masculine religions, but did not solve the problem of feminine religion (traditional religion of the hearth), is simply to note that Rome expanded into old poor, majority underclass, semitic civilization without first solving the problem of producing a religion of women, slaves, and underclasses – is simply to say that we grew too fast under aryanism in the ancient world just as we are growing too fast under aryanism in the modern world – and that rates of adaptation reflect confidence, agency(conscientiousness), intelligence, and neuroticism – which is what separates the genders and classes. In a rapidly evolving commercial empire under Western Rome, and a collapsing commercial empire under Eastern Byzantium, Christianity provided women, slaves, and the underclasses a means of obtaining self-worth, and status by demanding reciprocal behavior despite their lack of physical, emotional, mental, social, economic, political agency. Monotheism is the religion of the herd not yet human. But the enduring values of our civlization are not semitic christian – they’re four thousand years old, first captured in writing by the Greeks: Excellence and Beauty, Heroism and Duty, Truth and Oath, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law, and resulting markets in everything as the only means of survival: evolution. This set of values – despite that they were only metaphysical, traditional, and institutional, functioned as the operating principle for western civilization that produced the fastest innovation and adaptation possible by man, and dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering and early death. The restoration of Aristotelian thought, northern and Atlantic trade, the contractualism that trade demanded, the printing and literacy that resulted, re-harmonized our scholarly thought with our social, commercial, legal, and military thought restored european civilization. The 20th century false promises are just the second attempt to destroy western civlization from within – by marxism neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and human difference denialism – planted the fertile minds already accustomed to false promise as escape from reality. The dirty secret of western civlization, is that the martial aristocracy created western civilization by profiting from the incremental domestication man like they domesticated animals, using incremental slavery, serfdom, freedom, citizenship, and sovereignty to produce equals. And the failure of the British Experiment of an Aristocracy of Everyone, was caused in the modern world as it was in the ancient by over extension of the franchise to those peoples insufficiently genetically pacified by western values, to survive persist, and participate in them. So continuing our thousands of years of civilizational tradition, the aristocracy of the masculine who have agency in reality, agree to use our law of reciprocity, to trade loyalty with the priesthood of the feminine who lack agency in reality, to persist our civilization. Because we all prioritize the pagan(aryan/martial), heathen(ancestor/nature), Aristotelian (masculine/scientific), secular humanist (feminine), christian (feminine) differently. And given each of us varies on the spectrum between the feminine and masculine mind, we prioritize our systems of calculating (faiths), according to our genetic needs. But as long as we hold to our ancestral law of oath, contract, reciprocity, jury, markets we survive, prosper, and evolve. And that is enough. And that is what I seek to achieve: the continued evolution of our tradition from informal traditional law, to rights of anglo saxons, to British constitution, to american constitution, to finally a ‘bible’ of western civilization written in the neutral language of our martial-dominant male, judicial-neutral, priestly-feminine Trifunctionalism: the Natural Law of Reciprocity. And our continued evolution into the gods we imagined.
No. There Aren’t “Too Many Notes”. 😉 https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/no-there-arent-too-many-notes/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:00:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265840332169674759
May 26, 2020, 3:05 PM
—“lotta words here”—Greg Allen
what do you think i should say in response to your “lotta words” which is a classic example of “too many notes”.
—“can u just be less gobbledegook and more concise? aren’t you trying to educate ppl?”—Greg Allen
Not everyone can learn economics and calculus, but most can learn the general rules produced by economics and calculus. Similarly, not everyone can learn P-logic since it is a combination of programming, economics, and law, but most people can learn the general rules produced by P-logic and it’s combination of programming, economics, and law. I am trying to educate people who can be educated in a technical discipline like P-logic that is as hard as any other STEM education. I leave teaching the general rules produced by P-logic to those who specialize in it: John Mark and In Truth Victorious Most of P-law (operational logic) makes use of SERIES of fully disambiguated definitions). Those series of definitions are consistent and coherent with other definitions. Those definitions can be used to construct arguments in operational grammar that looks like programming accounting transactions of human actions. Together they produce a precise system of measurement. That system of measurement serves to render commensurable all cognitive, metaphysical-linguistic, psychological and social sciences. In this case, someone asked for the meaning of calculation, and then Brandon Hayes correctly suggested that I complete the explanation by providing the relationship between calculation and decidability. This is a technical question. Most very very smart people take six months to understand P. Others take years. its not all that difficult to understand. It is fairly difficult to DO. Although Martin, Brandon and others will help you if you need it.
May 26, 2020, 3:05 PM
—“lotta words here”—Greg Allen
what do you think i should say in response to your “lotta words” which is a classic example of “too many notes”.
—“can u just be less gobbledegook and more concise? aren’t you trying to educate ppl?”—Greg Allen
Not everyone can learn economics and calculus, but most can learn the general rules produced by economics and calculus. Similarly, not everyone can learn P-logic since it is a combination of programming, economics, and law, but most people can learn the general rules produced by P-logic and it’s combination of programming, economics, and law. I am trying to educate people who can be educated in a technical discipline like P-logic that is as hard as any other STEM education. I leave teaching the general rules produced by P-logic to those who specialize in it: John Mark and In Truth Victorious Most of P-law (operational logic) makes use of SERIES of fully disambiguated definitions). Those series of definitions are consistent and coherent with other definitions. Those definitions can be used to construct arguments in operational grammar that looks like programming accounting transactions of human actions. Together they produce a precise system of measurement. That system of measurement serves to render commensurable all cognitive, metaphysical-linguistic, psychological and social sciences. In this case, someone asked for the meaning of calculation, and then Brandon Hayes correctly suggested that I complete the explanation by providing the relationship between calculation and decidability. This is a technical question. Most very very smart people take six months to understand P. Others take years. its not all that difficult to understand. It is fairly difficult to DO. Although Martin, Brandon and others will help you if you need it.
May 26, 2020, 11:28 PM —“Curt sees everything in the context sexual gratification. It’s an interesting theory, but doesn’t explain why countless martyrs in the ancient world were voluntarily flayed alive, burned alive, eaten alive, etc., in the name of Christ. It doesn’t explain why children voluntarily died for Christ. It doesn’t explain why the barbarians, in a very short timeframe, put down their weapons and picked up crosses and scripture. Presumably, they didn’t have any problems with women. It simply doesn’t provide an adequate explanation for the dramatic shift in the world resulting from Christ.”—Emil Suric
—“Curt Doolittle what’s your take on that?”—Skye Stewart
I think that’s silly. (Actually i think it’s a rationalization to defend a prior. And Emil is not a foolish person. He is a product of his culture. And like most, even some of the best, he cannot overcome it.) I see everything: 1 – In context of acquisition. 2 – I understand how limited our agency (free will). 3 – I understand that the bias in our cognition has only three axis of variation, of which the physical differences in brain structure and chemical signaling between the sexes is most significant. (the others being developmental hierarchy and developmental degree). 4 – I understand that civilizations use strategies, myths, and grammars to defend them. 5 – And that people are largely ‘bots’ running that software on hardware with different biases. 6 – And it takes both a less biased brain and mind, and a tremendous amount of effort to free ourselves of those inheritances. Most of my work if not all of it provides a uniform system of measurement to circumvent those biases, which producing the first complete language of science: testimony. RELIGION Martyrs were killed because: (a) they would not demonstrate even token loyalty to the empire – instead disloyalty and treason. (b) they were considered atheists (god deniers) and impious in an era where pleasing the gods was considered necessary. (c) they were spreading a falsehood that tacitus correctly called a ‘mischievous superstition’. (d) the religion they were spreading was a hatred of the human race, and of life and joy itself. (e) the religion they were spreading put itself above reality and the state rather than a peerage to reality and the state. (f) they were fomenting an underclass rebellion against the empire’s demonstrated benefits the majority valued with a false promise of supernatural benefits of a hostile minority. (g) they were creating conflict between sects and forenting social unrest. (h)they were reversing the aryan program of incremental domestication of the underclasses and the gradual earning of freedom, liberty, and sovereignty (privilege) creating peers in a majority “middle class” (propertied) civilization. They were rightly considered anti social and treasonous. Just as we rightly consider the ((())) marxists, postmodernists, feminists, hbd-denialists, and anti-traditionalists, ant-moralists, anti-martialists, anti-familists, and sexual deviants today as a means of undermining the aristocracy. The romans were far too kind, have been far too kind during the middle ages, and just as we are far too kind today. They should have exterminated them to the last man woman and child. And in doing so saved europe from the dark ages.
Is the State Moral? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/is-the-state-moral-3/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 00:39:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265804935356178432
Q: How Can Violence Be Reciprocal (moral)? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/q-how-can-violence-be-reciprocal-moral-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 00:39:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265804802023456771