Thinking about Hoppe. If he cut out the Jewish critique – which he does for ego and laughs – and cut out the jewish heaping of undue praise – which he does to signal loyalty, and cut out the kantian rationalism (which he can’t help – he’s german – his work is solid. If…If…
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 19:32:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425903113576321024
I like that. Male Karens. Pretty much. yep.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 19:30:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425902579754614787
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425901982439677966
This technique is called one of a spectrum or synonyms: Justification, Dialectic, Sophistry, Pilpul, Suggestion, Deceit, or Fraud.The abrahamic method uses Pilpul. What you didn’t do instead was falsify the premise of each inference(suggestion) by testing whether its testifiable.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 19:05:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425896345265709057
Reply addressees: @Catholi64501821 @kanungo_priyam @iamnotasophist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425886205321883649
You just used abrahamic critique, and the false claim of equality of argument, (origins: female undermining) instead of putting forth an argument.
I am very good at what I do. I am the very best living at what I do. And it’s as terrifying as was Darwin. For me too.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 18:11:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425882676901421057
Reply addressees: @Catholi64501821 @kanungo_priyam @iamnotasophist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425880303344701446
OMFG…. that’s ridiculous.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 17:43:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425875558513139712
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @Lord__Sousa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425875163757912071
It was an accident. Should have said europeans. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 17:40:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425874848606261256
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425874665789132803
RT @ThruTheHayes: @curtdoolittle @kartuzija “Terminal anglo cope” the thing about the truth of this statement is; criticizing it (as a cope…
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 17:22:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425870230606209027
That wasn’t my purpose but if you’re intellectually honest and capable (and it appears you might be) then sure, help me understand what you believe, because I suspect if you’re a catholic intellectual it might be non-bad.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 15:50:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425847098830991365
Reply addressees: @Catholi64501821 @kanungo_priyam @iamnotasophist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425846686706982920
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Being able to perpetually externalize your country’s costs onto Americans means you can afford to skip ri…
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 15:49:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425846816554332167
If you’re claiming ignorance, then you must ask, not tell. you told, so you’re asserting that you possess knowledge you clearly dont. As such you’re lying. And you’re exacerbating your lie by asking me to pay the cost of refuting your lie.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 15:30:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425842101275795460
Reply addressees: @Dialogia2 @iamnotasophist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425841798119837702
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Dialogia2 @iamnotasophist Well,many things are not a matter of common knowledge. We wouldn’t need science, testimony, courts, if we relied on common knowledge.
Either you possess sufficient knowledge of the field to disagree or you don’t. If you’re reliant on common knowledge you’re claiming ignorance.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1425841798119837702