dammnit you’re soooo goood at this.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-02 02:21:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444125346018779138
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444124672820396035
dammnit you’re soooo goood at this.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-02 02:21:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444125346018779138
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444124672820396035
no.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-02 00:40:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444099953215905796
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @_Akhaten
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444099789478580230
(I’ve seen it. It’s prettier, more expensive, and nothing else. He’s got same problem as ridley scott but worse.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-02 00:37:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444099155010457613
Reply addressees: @RealNightNation
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444098612036837379
😉 Hugs PZ.
Just a long-time follower of your work, career, GF, and every other think tank since the 80s beforehand. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-02 00:25:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444096210114125828
Reply addressees: @PeterZeihan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444095093107998722
I don’t really watch pop commentary, but Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet ) is my favorite online personality, with the best content, presentation, and wit. I wish I could pull that off. He’s my hero. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-01 23:33:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444083046374903811
I get confused too. I read Martin then look in the mirror hoping to find a taller, thinner, younger me.
Doesn’t ever happen. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-01 23:30:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444082410686226436
Reply addressees: @WesternRenaiss2 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444081517752307715
(Sorry: Article is gated. How does it apply to retraction? Or is it a productive(clarifying) or unproductive(obscuring) analysis of the problems in the humanities?)
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-01 23:27:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444081522986954755
Reply addressees: @RetractionWatch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444074708174090241
(agreed. just trying to provide you with comfort at the difficulty – it’s not you.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-01 23:17:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444079014365351937
Reply addressees: @WesternRenaiss2 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444078893544079361
@TOOEdit RE: http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/HenrichReview.pdf
This piece is flawless KM. Thanks from all of us.
(Wonder about Duchesne’s now. He seemed to have a more positive view of the church. IMO: Strategically, Militariliy, Economically, technologically, scientifically, it was a catastrophe.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-01 22:05:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444060948642336769
PETER: Correct. Although as I tweeted in response to you before, by making it a political issue, they converted it from a scientific to a moral issue, and people always and everywhere double down on moral issues – and they don’t forget it. And it’s a heavy straw for the camel.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-01 21:58:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444059098106957824
Reply addressees: @PeterZeihan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444057466552061952