You need to explain that a bit because it’s pretty hard to read between those lines.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-03 22:28:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444791482309873672
Reply addressees: @TimBeckley3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444791311869964294
So I provided a definition, one that is a first principle, from first causes. Your sophistry attempts at deception by conflating a spectrum with a state, as if ‘survival’ is the same as the reduction of stress of survival.
(I know Abrahamic deceit taught you these techniques.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-03 22:23:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444790249096417280
Reply addressees: @vladnabatov @Catholi64501821
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444788962678161410
I’m asking you that question. You argued against my criticism. You won’t define your terms. You just engaged in sophistry. And that’s partly because you don’t understand the first grammatical rule of continuous recursive disambiguation, and the second: the absence of closure.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-03 22:21:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444789670450237441
Reply addressees: @vladnabatov @Catholi64501821
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444788962678161410
Agreed.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-03 22:10:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444786887370158085
Reply addressees: @FlavorToasty
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444786674794332161
Again. Answer the question. I know what my definition is. What is yours?
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-03 22:00:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444784386529013760
Reply addressees: @vladnabatov @Catholi64501821
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444782637613203464
I’ve asked you to try to define that term, so that I can answer it. Try.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-03 21:46:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444780988157079554
Reply addressees: @vladnabatov @Catholi64501821
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444779858224197639
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Multi-generationally invested family is the ideal mechanism for leveraging the compatibility between men…
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-03 20:58:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444768860574470145
Technically they call it ‘humanism’.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-03 20:55:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444768145214947331
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444766386102882308
The most popular public presenters all are jewish and rely on the female method of seduction of freedom from some sort of scarcity by false promise using suggestion by storytelling. it’s quite easy with P to ‘expose’ all of them as snake oil salesman.
(the same for all priests) https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1444761544097738753
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-03 20:36:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444763288710127623
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1444761544097738753
I don’t pay much attention to Sam Harris, but the Female hole in his logic – his origin of decidability – only serves as evidence of my point. He cannot grasp it’s not emotion, but that emotion exists for cooperation, and cooperation for acquisition, and together for evolution.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-03 20:29:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1444761544097738753