Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • This Is Why You Fail: In Evolution All that Matters Is Speed.

    Mar 9, 2020, 3:07 PM

    —“Before 300 BC where was and how powerful was Western civilisation?”—

    Do you mean the indo european expansion that conquered and eradicated every competitor from spain to the border of china? Do you mean the Hittites that very nearly conquered egypt? Do you mean the Dorians that conquered greece, or the Itals that conquered Italy? Do you mean the celts who tried to conquer the itals (romans) but were, as a consequence, the victims of the Roman genocide? Or do you mean the germanics that conquered the romans because of the vacuum the celtic holocaust created? The reason for the west’s success is not who is first, but who evolves and adapts fastest. Compare that to every single other civilization. Why does everyone else evolve and adapt slowly? I spent decades trying to answer that question. It began with the indo european expansion. The Yamna(ukraine, russia) the Corded Ware (poland, germany), the mediterranean (anatolians, greece, then rome), the coast, the continent. A fully militarized society, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets in everything, producing meritocracy, and adaptive velocity. It can’t be done faster. Every institution we have exchanged stress for speed. Every other people avoid stress and therefore pay a cost of speed. This is why you fail. You think first matters. All that matters is speed. Edit

  • Stay Focused.

    Mar 10, 2020, 2:34 PM It’s one thing to know your enemy It’s another to know your women are the vector for your enemy. It’s another to know your religion opens the vector for your enemy. It’s another to know your genome and your culture leaves open the door for the enemy. It’s yet another thing to grasp that once you name the enemy, and implement law against that enemy, you create a market to profit from the defeat of the enemy. And you create a paradigm, vocabulary, and logic for continuously suppressing that enemy. And a means of educating future generations to do the same. The constitution is a pretty public expression of a prohibition, on false promise baiting into hazard, particularly hazards that violate realism, naturalism, physical law, natural law, law of evolution and transcendence and P-Law is a painfully precise paradigm, vocabulary and logic for defense against abuse of it.

  • Stay Focused.

    Mar 10, 2020, 2:34 PM It’s one thing to know your enemy It’s another to know your women are the vector for your enemy. It’s another to know your religion opens the vector for your enemy. It’s another to know your genome and your culture leaves open the door for the enemy. It’s yet another thing to grasp that once you name the enemy, and implement law against that enemy, you create a market to profit from the defeat of the enemy. And you create a paradigm, vocabulary, and logic for continuously suppressing that enemy. And a means of educating future generations to do the same. The constitution is a pretty public expression of a prohibition, on false promise baiting into hazard, particularly hazards that violate realism, naturalism, physical law, natural law, law of evolution and transcendence and P-Law is a painfully precise paradigm, vocabulary and logic for defense against abuse of it.

  • Why, in THOUSANDS OF YEARS, did no one accomplish ten percent of what europeans

    Why, in THOUSANDS OF YEARS, did no one accomplish ten percent of what europeans did https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/why-in-thousands-of-years-did-no-one-accomplish-ten-percent-of-what-europeans-did/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 01:06:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266174057306902529

  • Questions and Answers

    Mar 11, 2020, 11:35 AM

    —“Are there any books you would recommend on the early history of European peoples? I read a post of yours recently and realized There were several references I didn’t pick up. Specifically when you reference things about “indo-Europeans”, etc. Thanks. Interested in learning more about what informs your perspective on Christianity and it’s triumph over Olympian religion. You seem to view it as a net negative. Do you have any recommendations for other groups on FB having the types of discussions you are having?”— A Friend

    ANSWERS There is nowhere to learn more, better, faster, than following daily here. It is the lowest cost education you can get, in the education you want and need. My reading list is on the website under the Propertarianism menu heading. All of it is available for free in our digital library. The IE history is simple. Although I would recommend chapter one of Armstrong’s “Transformation” so you learn about the differences in the emergence of different religious traditions. Religion is the ‘hard problem’ because our religion is communicated with the Abrahamic Technique. And there is no easy way of reforming that religion without gradual supplement with what used to be stoicism-empiricism and natural law, and letting nature take it’s course. The only reason I’m interested in our IE religions is because they’re ethnocentric, and christianity is not. I view abrahamic deceit, submission, and universalism as antithetical to our civilization. You can ask the other leadership for advice. I’m a little overwhelmed with biz, video, and writing at the moment.

  • Questions and Answers

    Mar 11, 2020, 11:35 AM

    —“Are there any books you would recommend on the early history of European peoples? I read a post of yours recently and realized There were several references I didn’t pick up. Specifically when you reference things about “indo-Europeans”, etc. Thanks. Interested in learning more about what informs your perspective on Christianity and it’s triumph over Olympian religion. You seem to view it as a net negative. Do you have any recommendations for other groups on FB having the types of discussions you are having?”— A Friend

    ANSWERS There is nowhere to learn more, better, faster, than following daily here. It is the lowest cost education you can get, in the education you want and need. My reading list is on the website under the Propertarianism menu heading. All of it is available for free in our digital library. The IE history is simple. Although I would recommend chapter one of Armstrong’s “Transformation” so you learn about the differences in the emergence of different religious traditions. Religion is the ‘hard problem’ because our religion is communicated with the Abrahamic Technique. And there is no easy way of reforming that religion without gradual supplement with what used to be stoicism-empiricism and natural law, and letting nature take it’s course. The only reason I’m interested in our IE religions is because they’re ethnocentric, and christianity is not. I view abrahamic deceit, submission, and universalism as antithetical to our civilization. You can ask the other leadership for advice. I’m a little overwhelmed with biz, video, and writing at the moment.

  • “Encouraging Fellow Germans out Of Victim Mentality”

    “ENCOURAGING FELLOW GERMANS OUT OF VICTIM MENTALITY” by Daniel Gurpide With the purpose of encouraging my German comrades to grow out of an unhelpful and debilitating victim mentality, let me add my two friendly cents: Modern Germany (1871) had the potential to rejuvenate old Europe, to extend the European age, and the primacy OF Europe, in the world for centuries to come. They destroyed this prospect because of their obsession with their own primacy IN Europe, finally and perhaps irrevocably, during the II WW. Often stronger, and on occasion more thoughtful than others, Germans, from Nietzsche to Spengler to even Hitler, would speak of the dangers to Western civilization, to the race, and to Europe. In practice, instead of consolidating europe, they would mightily contribute to the perils of the West, of Europe, and in the end, of their own Germany. There is no isolated virtue. Perhaps the very introspective qualities of the Germans obscured their better understanding of other peoples. Through a kind of offensive shortsightedness, together with an eventually disastrous alliance, they threw themselves into the First World War. The traditional order of Europe was mortally wounded during that struggle. The wounds of the German people were terrible, but far from mortal. They were sick at being treated with a great deal of injustice, as pariahs among the nations of Europe, at least for a while. Soon they would rise again and treat in turn, with far more injustice, the other nations of Europe as their pariahs. Let us also not forget that in 1917 the Kaiser and his Prussians (self-proclaimed champions of Western civilization) chose to make it possible for Lenin to re-enter Russia. In 1939 the anti-Bolshevik Hitler and his nazis chose to make it possible for Stalin to re-enter Europe. They were very successful in the short run. They destroyed themselves in the long run. Would the Bolsheviks have been able to make their revolution in 1917 if Lenin had stayed closeted in Zurich, or would Stalin have been able to get to Warsaw, not to speak of Berlin, if Hitler had not started the IIWW?

  • “Encouraging Fellow Germans out Of Victim Mentality”

    “ENCOURAGING FELLOW GERMANS OUT OF VICTIM MENTALITY” by Daniel Gurpide With the purpose of encouraging my German comrades to grow out of an unhelpful and debilitating victim mentality, let me add my two friendly cents: Modern Germany (1871) had the potential to rejuvenate old Europe, to extend the European age, and the primacy OF Europe, in the world for centuries to come. They destroyed this prospect because of their obsession with their own primacy IN Europe, finally and perhaps irrevocably, during the II WW. Often stronger, and on occasion more thoughtful than others, Germans, from Nietzsche to Spengler to even Hitler, would speak of the dangers to Western civilization, to the race, and to Europe. In practice, instead of consolidating europe, they would mightily contribute to the perils of the West, of Europe, and in the end, of their own Germany. There is no isolated virtue. Perhaps the very introspective qualities of the Germans obscured their better understanding of other peoples. Through a kind of offensive shortsightedness, together with an eventually disastrous alliance, they threw themselves into the First World War. The traditional order of Europe was mortally wounded during that struggle. The wounds of the German people were terrible, but far from mortal. They were sick at being treated with a great deal of injustice, as pariahs among the nations of Europe, at least for a while. Soon they would rise again and treat in turn, with far more injustice, the other nations of Europe as their pariahs. Let us also not forget that in 1917 the Kaiser and his Prussians (self-proclaimed champions of Western civilization) chose to make it possible for Lenin to re-enter Russia. In 1939 the anti-Bolshevik Hitler and his nazis chose to make it possible for Stalin to re-enter Europe. They were very successful in the short run. They destroyed themselves in the long run. Would the Bolsheviks have been able to make their revolution in 1917 if Lenin had stayed closeted in Zurich, or would Stalin have been able to get to Warsaw, not to speak of Berlin, if Hitler had not started the IIWW?

  • Heroism

    Mar 14, 2020, 12:03 PM

    Yep. The frustrating Miracle of the West: we only act in crisis, but we are f–king awesome at acting in crisis. Why?  HEROISM.

  • Heroism

    Mar 14, 2020, 12:03 PM

    Yep. The frustrating Miracle of the West: we only act in crisis, but we are f–king awesome at acting in crisis. Why?  HEROISM.