1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to tolerate the demands of the south, and the south couldn’t economically afford to abandon slavery. The solution was to return them to Africa, and some were, but without Fiat Currency couldn’t do it.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to
-
1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to
1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to tolerate the demands of the south, and the south couldn’t economically afford to abandon slavery. The solution was to return them to Africa, and some were, but without Fiat Currency couldn’t do it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-20 12:56:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274325333093777408
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274129785644634116
-
THE HISTORY OF LYNCHING Hanging has always been the primary means of execution i
THE HISTORY OF LYNCHING
Hanging has always been the primary means of execution in western civlization. Lynching was developed during wartime when when justice was too far away, and horse thieves were interfering with military stock. In the Lynch period f… https://t.co/WVt10xtXyt -
THE HISTORY OF LYNCHING Hanging has always been the primary means of execution i
THE HISTORY OF LYNCHING
Hanging has always been the primary means of execution in western civlization. Lynching was developed during wartime when when justice was too far away, and horse thieves were interfering with military stock. In the Lynch period f… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGsEt1k4H_Q
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-20 12:26:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274317646511685632
-
WERE THE FOUNDING FATHERS HYPOCRITES? (answering the hard questions) (from Twitt
WERE THE FOUNDING FATHERS HYPOCRITES?
(answering the hard questions) (from Twitter)
—“How do you respond to people who say that the Founding Fathers were hypocrites for owning slaves?”—Julie Borowski @JulieBorowski
1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to tolerate the demands of the south, and the south couldn’t economically afford to abandon slavery. The solution was to return them to Africa, and some were, but without Fiat Currency couldn’t finance it. It was the worst financial decision in american history..
2) So instead of the high cost of paying for the repatriation of the slaves, and borrowing to compensate the southern farms to convert to employment labor, we had a far more costly civil war of anti-secession when the north realized that the south would rule the western expansion, leaving the (puritain) north isolated and behind.
3) Humans mask their economic incentives with moral claims, but as in all things ‘follow the money’. If we asked all the farmers today to go without immigrant labor, universities without foreigners, and services without minorities, prices would skyrocket, and bankruptcies ensue.
4) The great crime was the false promise of the possibility of integration of vastly different people, when Europe had already discovered the impossibility of integrating even (neolithic farmer) mediterranean and germanic (horse) peoples, and Ireland was a third world country.
5) And so blacks are in an impossible position because they cannot form a polity producing norms, traditions, values, commons, and political systems given the distribution of their abilities (vastly larger lower class, deeper sexual maturity), and whites can’t tolerate the costs to THEIR commons.
6) The solution we find everywhere is we separate into neighborhoods, and watch every city turn into Johannesberg (Detroit, Baltimore) as the absolutely inevitable deterministic effects of natural differences take their course: productive whites, asians and jews flee civic plague.
7) the cosmopolitan project of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, political correctness designed repeat the attempt by judaism, christianity, and islam to deprive nations of self determination, sovereignty, and meritocracy, and reduce them to dark ages yet again is over.
8) We can only cooperate by trade, but we cannot cohabitate or share suffrage, since our group strategies due to genetic differences and genetic distributions. Only europeans can produce high trust commons with high investment parenting expressly for producing commons. Period.
9) No other people can come close to achieving it, except the Koreans and Japanese, and even then, they can’t produce commons only refrain from consuming them.
10) African Slavery, industrialized by islam, was a purely economic decision for purely rational reasons : resistance to malaria. Even so, at present rates, African Americans will have killed more of one another over a century than slaves were brought to America. (Yes, really).
11) African Americans have only one oppressor: the mirror. The only solution is (a) Separation so that their elites cannot defect, leaving 2/3 of their population incapable of social, economic, and politcal organization and (b) six generations of one child at for unemployables.
12) Why this is so obvious to my African audience (“There is nothing wrong with Africans that shrinking the bottom won’t fix”) and so intolerable to Americans? Because Americans like puritans, are shallow virtue-signaling moralizers masters of deceit without lying in the world.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-20 09:24:00 UTC
-
HISTORY OF LYNCHING Hanging has always been the primary means of execution in we
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGsEt1k4H_QTHE HISTORY OF LYNCHING
Hanging has always been the primary means of execution in western civlization. Lynching was developed during wartime when when justice was too far away, and horse thieves were interfering with military stock. In the Lynch period from 1882-1903 – there were a total of 3,337 lynchings, 1,169 white, 2,060 black, 108 unknown. For serious crimes. The competent legal authorities were hundreds of miles away, and the crime was heinous. Blacks also formed lynch mobs, and hanged whites, i particular for rape. It’s purpose was punishment to set example. It was for vengeance. It reflected the community’s sense of justice, and free of political or legal artifice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGsEt1k4H_QUpdated Jun 20, 2020, 8:26 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-20 08:26:00 UTC
-
UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH: All civilizations treat women as indisposable and men as di
UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH: All civilizations treat women as indisposable and men as disposable. All heterogeneous civilizations treat some men as more disposable than others. Both are evolutionary necessities we call selection pressures.
So blame god. We just follow his orders.
BLM -
UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH: All civilizations treat women as indisposable and men as di
UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH: All civilizations treat women as indisposable and men as disposable. All heterogeneous civilizations treat some men as more disposable than others. Both are evolutionary necessities we call selection pressures.
So blame god. We just follow his orders.
BLM
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-19 15:31:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274001823909793798
-
The enemy resorts to “appropriation, popularization, and distribution” because h
The enemy resorts to “appropriation, popularization, and distribution” because he appears genetically and culturally incapable of innovation and creation.
They have evolved to specialize in lying by half truths
Reply addressees: @WesternTumuli -
The enemy resorts to “appropriation, popularization, and distribution” because h
The enemy resorts to “appropriation, popularization, and distribution” because he appears genetically and culturally incapable of innovation and creation.
They have evolved to specialize in lying by half truths
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-19 11:52:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273946660150878208
Reply addressees: @WesternTumuli
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1273946146969456640