Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Woke: a repetition of the Jewish Christian ad Muslim destruction of the ancient world

    Once you switch over to understanding marxism-neo-marxism, pomo, feminism, pc/wok, anti-whiteness, white replacement, white genocide, is just a repetition of the Jewish Christian ad Muslim destruction of the ancient world by inventing the great lie of monotheism to deny the discovery of the laws of nature, then the present repetition of the Jewish, Christian, Muslim destruction of the ancient world and the present Jewish, pomo, Muslim destruction of the modern world is rather easy to understand. Our problem is that our church didn’t reform and we are stuck with fundamentalist Christians and a failed system of churches, rather than a reformed church that was compatible with and reinforced our group strategy of discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of the universe, with Jesus’ love as the means of tolerating the tragedy of those laws.

  • Chinese, Semites, and Europeans

    IMPORTANT Chinese developed state and harmony first, so they can conquer and assimilate tribes and subraces by slow institutional educational linguistic and cultural integration. Europeans developed law and heroic competition. So we can innovate but not conquer and assimilate. Likewise, the Chinese can defend culturally and militarily, while Europeans can defend militarily but not culturally. The Semites war against culture by total war against the institutions of culture, and state and military as a byproduct. But they can’t produce states or law (or economies for that matter). Fascism was an attempt to eliminate this vulnerability by eliminating tolerance for competition in religion, education, and culture, thereby preserving economy, state, and military – and self-determination. This prevents the west and far east from falling to Semitic undermining of civilization. Gramsci wasn’t inventing anything. He was merely repeating what the Jews, Christians and Muslims had done in the ancient world. Just explaining it in secular prose.

  • Chinese, Semites, and Europeans

    IMPORTANT Chinese developed state and harmony first, so they can conquer and assimilate tribes and subraces by slow institutional educational linguistic and cultural integration. Europeans developed law and heroic competition. So we can innovate but not conquer and assimilate. Likewise, the Chinese can defend culturally and militarily, while Europeans can defend militarily but not culturally. The Semites war against culture by total war against the institutions of culture, and state and military as a byproduct. But they can’t produce states or law (or economies for that matter). Fascism was an attempt to eliminate this vulnerability by eliminating tolerance for competition in religion, education, and culture, thereby preserving economy, state, and military – and self-determination. This prevents the west and far east from falling to Semitic undermining of civilization. Gramsci wasn’t inventing anything. He was merely repeating what the Jews, Christians and Muslims had done in the ancient world. Just explaining it in secular prose.

  • Why European Civilization Succeeded – and Others Didn”t

    Why European Civilization Succeeded – and Others Didn”tTrifunctionalism of European Cross Class Dependency1. Military Duty and Prussian heroism2. Commercial Reciprocity and civic virtue3. Religious Piety and Christian charityAn army of everyone, doing their duty, with loyalty between the classes and their methods of organization.

  • Why European Civilization Succeeded – and Others Didn”t

    Why European Civilization Succeeded – and Others Didn”tTrifunctionalism of European Cross Class Dependency1. Military Duty and Prussian heroism2. Commercial Reciprocity and civic virtue3. Religious Piety and Christian charityAn army of everyone, doing their duty, with loyalty between the classes and their methods of organization.

  • Putin’s Accusation of Munich “Betrayal” in Context

    -“In late 2019, I read an article on RT news in which Putin was arguing with the revisionist historians about WWII who wanted to change history. Putin mentioned “the Munich Betrayal,” but it was not explained what it is. Sincere question: what is the Munich Betrayal?”- A Friend

    This topic requires more than a few tweets. The Munich betrayal was the appeasement of Germany by the handover of germanic Czech territory. However, ‘betrayal’ fails to grasp that:

    a) containing the bolsheviks/communists was equal or more important than containing the germans/fascists. b) the people in politically Czech territory were in fact Germans, c) the post-napoleon restoration of the HRE/Germanic federation/empire. d) the same had been done to the Russians prior to the war by the English and french etc (preventing retaking Constantinople, and restoring the orthodox civ). So moralizing events is misleading, and rearview mirror moralizing naive. The French Revolution started it, Napoleon, did the dirty deed. Think of Napoleon and France as continuing the wars of religion between feminine latin authoritarianism and masculine germanic meritocracy.

    1. The French were the most backward country in Europe and the french revolution the most dramatic and violent. The germanic countries modernized fine. The French didn’t. They were still a ‘catholic’ country with authoritarian tendencies. (like the Russians).
    2. the Napoleonic conquest of Europe and the ideas of the french revolution were spread by force as were Arab Islam and Jewish Communism. A counter-reaction against the wars of religion.
    3. Betrayal presumes people are more than bots. They aren’t. They’re bots. This is an ancient dispute between people in an Atlantic to Urals spectrum, just as China had the north-south spectrum of people in their ‘warring states period’. The Chinese managed to homogenize but lost their rate of adaptation. Europeans didn’t manage to homogenize and maintained their rate of adaptation.
    4. Our betrayal is (a) not saving the Russians from the Jewish bolsheviks, (b) not leaving the germans a path to reconstruction without totalitarianism, (c) not saving the Russians when the soviet union collapsed. (d) Anglo virtue-signaling policy is ALWAYS WRONG EVERY TIME.
    5. And (e) Perhaps worst of all, we didn’t suppress the Jewish communist, socialist, neo-marxist, and postmodern movements in the 1950’s because we were drunk on our own virtues, the certainty of our cultural and institutional victory.

    Gramsci (cultural Marxism): Leninism (authoritarian marxism) “Have to have a political party”: Lenin v1 > Stalin v2 > Mao v3 > Woke v4

  • Putin’s Accusation of Munich “Betrayal” in Context

    -“In late 2019, I read an article on RT news in which Putin was arguing with the revisionist historians about WWII who wanted to change history. Putin mentioned “the Munich Betrayal,” but it was not explained what it is. Sincere question: what is the Munich Betrayal?”- A Friend

    This topic requires more than a few tweets. The Munich betrayal was the appeasement of Germany by the handover of germanic Czech territory. However, ‘betrayal’ fails to grasp that:

    a) containing the bolsheviks/communists was equal or more important than containing the germans/fascists. b) the people in politically Czech territory were in fact Germans, c) the post-napoleon restoration of the HRE/Germanic federation/empire. d) the same had been done to the Russians prior to the war by the English and french etc (preventing retaking Constantinople, and restoring the orthodox civ). So moralizing events is misleading, and rearview mirror moralizing naive. The French Revolution started it, Napoleon, did the dirty deed. Think of Napoleon and France as continuing the wars of religion between feminine latin authoritarianism and masculine germanic meritocracy.

    1. The French were the most backward country in Europe and the french revolution the most dramatic and violent. The germanic countries modernized fine. The French didn’t. They were still a ‘catholic’ country with authoritarian tendencies. (like the Russians).
    2. the Napoleonic conquest of Europe and the ideas of the french revolution were spread by force as were Arab Islam and Jewish Communism. A counter-reaction against the wars of religion.
    3. Betrayal presumes people are more than bots. They aren’t. They’re bots. This is an ancient dispute between people in an Atlantic to Urals spectrum, just as China had the north-south spectrum of people in their ‘warring states period’. The Chinese managed to homogenize but lost their rate of adaptation. Europeans didn’t manage to homogenize and maintained their rate of adaptation.
    4. Our betrayal is (a) not saving the Russians from the Jewish bolsheviks, (b) not leaving the germans a path to reconstruction without totalitarianism, (c) not saving the Russians when the soviet union collapsed. (d) Anglo virtue-signaling policy is ALWAYS WRONG EVERY TIME.
    5. And (e) Perhaps worst of all, we didn’t suppress the Jewish communist, socialist, neo-marxist, and postmodern movements in the 1950’s because we were drunk on our own virtues, the certainty of our cultural and institutional victory.

    Gramsci (cultural Marxism): Leninism (authoritarian marxism) “Have to have a political party”: Lenin v1 > Stalin v2 > Mao v3 > Woke v4

  • Every Single Civ Resists Anglo Civilization. Here’s Why.

    1) Every single culture within western civilization and every civilization outside of it has revolted against the Anglo Empirical Revolution. The french, then germans, then Jewish, now Russian, Chinese, and Indian and all of Islam. Why? That’s relatively easy to answer (really). 2) English Empirical Revolution > French ‘Enlightenment’ > Germans > Jews(Mendelsohn v1, Marx v2) > Communists > Gramsci > Lenin > Jewish Frankfurt School > Derrida/Foucault and the endless tream of Jewish postmodernists > ADL+SPLC > PC+Woke >Anti-White(Ness) >White Replacement. 3) It’s the most correspondent with the laws of the universe, continuous natural selection using markets in aspect of life, including trifunctionalism of elites and classes, and military loyalty and duty between them: Military-State, Natural Law-Commerce, and Family-Faith. And… 4) Is the most behaviorally costly social order of all, and most controversially requires suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for those markets. And even such Christian charity to care for those unfit by demonstrated failure in those markets. 5) This is what ‘whiteness’ means. This is why the Jewish postwar attack on every aspect of our civilization began with an attack on prewar eugenics and flooding the country with immigrants unable to adapt to the high cost of western civilization. 6) They did this by false promise of freedom from physical laws (entropy, scarcity), behavioral laws (acquisition, self-interest, reciprocity, kin preference, norms=ratio of IQ to the economy), and evolutionary laws (load, regression to the mean, natural selection, the red queen). 7) And so they cast white civilization as oppressors rather than darwin, and created a pseudoscientific and sophomoric religion of the hatred of white people, and white civilization, despite having rescued them from ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, and child mortality. 8) BECAUSE THEY CAN’T COMPETE IN IT and will bring down the European civilization as the Jewish Christians brought down the roman empire, and the Muslims destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world.

  • Every Single Civ Resists Anglo Civilization. Here’s Why.

    1) Every single culture within western civilization and every civilization outside of it has revolted against the Anglo Empirical Revolution. The french, then germans, then Jewish, now Russian, Chinese, and Indian and all of Islam. Why? That’s relatively easy to answer (really). 2) English Empirical Revolution > French ‘Enlightenment’ > Germans > Jews(Mendelsohn v1, Marx v2) > Communists > Gramsci > Lenin > Jewish Frankfurt School > Derrida/Foucault and the endless tream of Jewish postmodernists > ADL+SPLC > PC+Woke >Anti-White(Ness) >White Replacement. 3) It’s the most correspondent with the laws of the universe, continuous natural selection using markets in aspect of life, including trifunctionalism of elites and classes, and military loyalty and duty between them: Military-State, Natural Law-Commerce, and Family-Faith. And… 4) Is the most behaviorally costly social order of all, and most controversially requires suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for those markets. And even such Christian charity to care for those unfit by demonstrated failure in those markets. 5) This is what ‘whiteness’ means. This is why the Jewish postwar attack on every aspect of our civilization began with an attack on prewar eugenics and flooding the country with immigrants unable to adapt to the high cost of western civilization. 6) They did this by false promise of freedom from physical laws (entropy, scarcity), behavioral laws (acquisition, self-interest, reciprocity, kin preference, norms=ratio of IQ to the economy), and evolutionary laws (load, regression to the mean, natural selection, the red queen). 7) And so they cast white civilization as oppressors rather than darwin, and created a pseudoscientific and sophomoric religion of the hatred of white people, and white civilization, despite having rescued them from ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, and child mortality. 8) BECAUSE THEY CAN’T COMPETE IN IT and will bring down the European civilization as the Jewish Christians brought down the roman empire, and the Muslims destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world.

  • 2. Aryanism (European civilization’s core drive) is heroic so breeds altruism an

    2. Aryanism (European civilization’s core drive) is heroic so breeds altruism and virtue signaling. It is the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 13:10:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355503652081954818

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355503650710425604

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    WHY DO WESTERN WOMEN UNDERMINE WESTERN CIVILIZATION?

    1. Anglos converted to 100% middle class, seeking cheap success in democracy without paying the cost of maintaining our intellectual, social, economic, political advantage by military service, unity, political control.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1355503650710425604