Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

Conflict 9: The Conquest of the Mediterranean

The Greeks

The Romans

May 21, 2021
Conflict 9: The Conquest of the Mediterranean

The Greeks

The Romans

May 21, 2021
Conflict 8: The Conquest of Europe

The West Indo European (Aryan) Europeans

Hierarchical and egalitarian only among the elite. From Pirates to Privateers and Bucaneers to Marines

( conquerers, and holders, rulers not just pirates and raiders)

The Anatolians (Hittites) The Greeks

The European (Germanic) Peoples

Kindred Not Clan: Germanic people practiced bilateral descent. Bilateral descent is a system of family lineage in which the relatives on the mother’s side and father’s side are equally important for emotional ties or for transfer of property or wealth. Descent and inheritance are passed equally through both parents. Families trace descent through both parents simultaneously and recognize multiple ancestors. And as a consequence it reduces risk and helps members live in extreme environments because it allows individuals to rely on two sets of families dispersed over a wide area. In other words the Kindred functioned as a micro-state or ‘pico-state’. Extended Families of Residential Nuclear Families: The pre-christian germanics practiced residential nuclear families, but the extended family — the kindred — retained their purpose as ‘insurers’ and as such were the organizing principle both socially and legally in the germanic tribes. The Sippe (Treaty): Sippe is German for “clan, kindred, extended family” – a band or confederation bound by a peace treaty or oath, not primarily restricted to blood relations. The average Sippe likely contained no more than 50 families. One of the functions of the Sippe was regulating use of forests (commons).

May 21, 2021
Conflict 8: The Conquest of Europe

The West Indo European (Aryan) Europeans

Hierarchical and egalitarian only among the elite. From Pirates to Privateers and Bucaneers to Marines

( conquerers, and holders, rulers not just pirates and raiders)

The Anatolians (Hittites) The Greeks

The European (Germanic) Peoples

Kindred Not Clan: Germanic people practiced bilateral descent. Bilateral descent is a system of family lineage in which the relatives on the mother’s side and father’s side are equally important for emotional ties or for transfer of property or wealth. Descent and inheritance are passed equally through both parents. Families trace descent through both parents simultaneously and recognize multiple ancestors. And as a consequence it reduces risk and helps members live in extreme environments because it allows individuals to rely on two sets of families dispersed over a wide area. In other words the Kindred functioned as a micro-state or ‘pico-state’. Extended Families of Residential Nuclear Families: The pre-christian germanics practiced residential nuclear families, but the extended family — the kindred — retained their purpose as ‘insurers’ and as such were the organizing principle both socially and legally in the germanic tribes. The Sippe (Treaty): Sippe is German for “clan, kindred, extended family” – a band or confederation bound by a peace treaty or oath, not primarily restricted to blood relations. The average Sippe likely contained no more than 50 families. One of the functions of the Sippe was regulating use of forests (commons).

May 21, 2021
Conflict 1: Thesis

The Solution To the Problem of Our Age Requires We Address A Taboo.

THE PROBLEM All institutions lag. Of law (market), state (commons), and religion (tradition), law evolves fastest. But even so, law that is dependent upon tradition, even an empirical tradition, and lacking formal logical foundation, cannot reform without crisis – any more than familes, social organizations, commerical organiztins, the sciences, governments, or religions reform without crisis And we are in civilizational Crisis for just this reason: our law is lagging in reform. The failure of the law of tort to keep pace with inventions in parasitism and predation generates demand for the state to via-positiva impose rules of conduct instead of the law’s via-negativa prohibitions on conduct. The objective of my work the reformation of our traditional, empirical, evolutionary, common law and its foundation in the law of tort, and dependence upon the test of reciprocity into a strictly constructed, formal, operational logic like that of programming. Computers cannot choose and have no instincts of their own, so we program them with what they must do given the operations it is possible for them to perform. Conversely, man can choose and has instincts of his own, we must program man with what they must not do, given the operations it is possible for mankind to perform. If we are successful in evolving norms, we program man by training and environmental exposure with the positive alternatives to those actions we wish to program him not to perform. It is always better to reward the man for doing a good than threaten a man with consequences for doing a bad. And while we adapt our norms to encourage different alternatives to the bad, we have evolved the habit of expressly prohibiting the bad, and codifying those prohibitions in law, and using institutions to enforce those prohibitions. These laws convert social norms by which one can be ostracized to institutional ways by which one can be punished for doing bads. Where that law of Tort (or Trespass, or Property), is dependent upon the logical necessity and empirical evidence of the universal human demand for Reciprocity, and that tests of reciprocity provide man with universal decidability in matters of conflict. And where that demand for Reciprocity includes every action or inaction, and all display, word and deed. That means reciprocity in everything we can pay any cost for, directly or indirectly, by action or inaction, whether private, shared, or commons. And While reciprocity-in-deed is ancient and obvious, the novelty in my work is ( …. scope and speech and display ) in demanding Reciprocity in word, that requires testifiable, warrantable claims for which one is liable. This requirement causes us to pay an even greater self-monitoring cost (what we call agency) than does reciprocity-in-deed. And this has been a problem. We have tolerated free speech when we meant truthful, reciprocal, moral, and constructive speech. science invent techniques of observation (measurement) and logic (measurement), that exhaust our … So when I say that my work in Propertarianism’s P-Logic, and P-Law complete the scientific method, I mean, that the scientific method evolved from, and is an application of, our law of evidentiary testimony, by extending the logic of tort from claims over property disputes, to all claims about the universe, ( … suppressing all false claims not just false claims over …) And that P-Logic and P-Law extend the prohibition on the spectrum of techniques of deception: of Laziness in failure of due diligence against error and bias; undue influence by loading and framing, suggestion and obscurantism,; deception by the three fictionalisms of verbal sophistry-to-idealism, physical magic-to pseudoscience, and imaginary occult to supernaturalism; and outright deceit by false promise, fraud, baiting into hazard. THOUGHT LEADERSHIP As strange as it might seem, there are only two groups of thought leaders in this present world, the Europeans and the Half European Jews we call Ashkenazi. And the Europeans and the Askenazi have polar opposite genetic intuitions, cultural strategies, civilizational ambitions, and designs for man. And to not surprisingly these strategies are as opposite as the male and female reproductive strategies that these civilizations institutionalized as their group strategies – because that is the underlying difference between these group strategies: European Masculine superpredation by military, political, and economic construction, and Semitic Feminine superpredation by social and moral construction to resist it. Why? The difference between male meritocracy producing eugenics, and female equalitarianism producing dysgenics. That’s the underlying conflict between male and female strategies, that is only mitigated by parenthood and monogamy with enough children to unite sex differences in cognition. Or to put in more common terms, the instinct for men to join in a loyal hierarchy, and the instinct of women to preserve ease of manipulation by words and emotions (infantilism) – both instincts are demonstrated as overwhelmingly in the literature as they are by common experience. ( … TITLE … ) While the Aristotelian restoration caused the middle class to re-harmonized common law and rule of law in opposition to (corrupt) church thought and resulted in the anglo empirical restoration, beginning with the “enlightenment”: the French, then German, then Jewish, now Islamic and Chinese counter-revolutions against the anglo empirical, agrarian, financial, commercial, industrial, Darwinian, Scientific, and german second-scientific revolutions, only the Jewish revolution has been successful in surviving: Boaz-Freud-Marx-Lenin-Stalin, Cantor-Bohr, Gramsci-Frankfurt-Neomarxism, and Derrida-Friedan and the postmodernists, Mises-Rand-Rothbard and the libertarians, and the neoconservatives. This Almost exclusively Jewish counter-revolution is reducible to a revolt against Darwin, and Darwin’s implied explanatin for the success of western civilization, Nietzche’s restoration of european ethics, and the opportunity created by the failure of the church to either follow the orthodoxy into ritual, nationalism, and morals of the family, or modernize by completing the natural law project thus retaining the church’s position as a judicial authority over european civilization. Instead they tried to maintain the Augustine and Aquinas attempt to keep the church’s superstition out of direct competition with Aristotelian reason. Ths counter revolution repeats the same technique as the destruction of Roman civlization, it’s arts, letters, philosophy, wisdome, and technology from within by jewish insurrectionists that today we call Christians. But instead of a false promises of life after death, extension of familial love to non-kin, pretense of moral high ground, status from pretense of moral high ground, and freedom from social stimatism of inferiority to the aristocratic classes, in the modern world, the Marxists, Neo Marxists, Postmodernists, anti-male feminists, and human biodiversity science deniers, offer freedom from physical lawas of scarcity, natural laws of self interest and reciprocity, and evolutionary laws of the amorality of man, the domesticatin of man, and regression to the mean, if the evil european males are overthrown and another equalitarian age replaces it – which of course, will require additional false promises until the people have forgotten the meaning of truth itself. In the face of this predominantly jewish counter-revolution against wesetern civlization, the aristocracy, and the nobility, and the classes of the able, have held to their christian faith that the common folk would continue to suppress their wants and impulses, and retain their piety and civility and adherence to tradition despite the new plenty that gave them license. But this project we call democracy and mass consumption in order to defeat communism, failed. Worse, western man’s canon is distributed across hundreds of tomes across hundreds of decades, and as such was practiced as a tradition but not written down in consolidated form accessible to the masses until quite possibly the American constitution – for reasons I’ll explain further in this work. Yet we are faced with the rather obvious evidence of the superiority of western civilization at least since the Romans and Greeks, if not yet sure about the Aryans, but we have failed to preserve it with religion, we have failed to preserve it with philosophy, and we seem to have only preserved it with the military, juridical government, the family, and our juridical law: traditions rather than persuasions or religions. Although all four, in addition to our knowledge of history, have been under attack by the Jewish left, and that third of our population who are willing accomplices, for fourscore and ten years – to borrow a phrase. And the Jewish left and their willing accomplices, in particular, single women, less developed immigrants, and now Islamists – the same people who brought Christianity to Roman civilization and gave us the dark ages rather than roman restoration, and destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world, So over the past decades as our civilization crumbles from insurrection within, despite postwar suppression by the Jewish left, we’ve seen scientists attempt to rescue our civilization by providing the answers that we ourselves have failed to write down as canon: why did Europeans outperform all other peoples in this world combined, in just a few centuries in the Aryan expansion, a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern world – and why were the dark ages dark, and why didn’t we have the industrial revolution by within a few hundred years after Aristotle? Thanks to the combination of computers, science, cognitive science – meaning neurology, and genetics, we know some of the answers, but I’m going to try to provide the rest, as well as how to restore our civilization despite the repeated counter-revolutions against it which seek to destroy our civilization once again.

—“Western cultural uniqueness originates from two powerful currents—aristocratic individualism resulting from the Indo-European settlement beginning around 2500 BC, and egalitarian individualism originating from the primordial Northern hunter-gatherers that populated Europe since before the Ice Ages. This article describes the origins and culture of the Indo-Europeans.”– Kevin Macdonald

A look at the literature contains two major arguments: Genetic, cultural, and philosophical. I’m going to do what behavioral economists do, and examine the incentives given the genetic, geographic, demographic, adversarial, institutional, scientific, and technological, differences between peoples and cultures – and treat literature, including philosophy, as largely post-hoc justification. It’s justification for the seizure of incentives that already exist. It’s the incentives that are causal – and not open to the various loadings, framings, obscurantisms and deceits humans so commonly commit to prose. My only substantive improvement on Macdonald and Duchesne will be an explanation of the incentives and resulting institutions and a minor improvement on genetics and cognitive science that have evolved over the past few years. And in doing so we’ll create a coherent and complete story of the evolution of western civilization and why it’s unique, produces excellence, is unrepeatable, and irreplaceable whether genetic, conceptual or institutional – because it’s all three. All intellectuals work from a primary frame. My frame is cognitive science, behavioral economics, methods of argument (language), institutions, and group strategy. This is a ‘constructivist’, ‘operational’, ‘causal’ frame.

Thesis:

The Physics of Mankind: The Most Important Lesson You Can Understand Today

There is no ‘point’ to evolution other than profiting from entropy, and therefore persisting in the defeat of entropy. There is however opportunity in evolution for any that chooses to discover and use it. The framework we’re all looking for is this: 1) human evolution, incrementally exhausted opportunity for adaptability (physical morphological, (distribution of energy in our organs), metabolic, cooperative, social, cognitive, conceptual). The mammalian organism and the primate shape provide a platform for greater exhaustion of opportunity physical opportunity for adaptation. The cortex and braincase for sensation, integration, perception, prediction (imagination), cognition, neural density; exhausting cooperative opportunity through memory, prediction, and intuition for reciprocity; neoteny exhausting the opportunity for the development of agency, and biochemistry is very close to maximizing velocity; and systems of measurement (sciences) exhausting the possibilities for cognitive coherence. Upon solving the remaining sciences what remains is the exhaustion of cellular repairability internally, the opportunities for direct enhancement of physical form through manipulation internally, and the available sources of energy externally. 2) Evolutionary computation by trial and error achieved this adaptation, and adaptation through a distribution (distributed variation) of traits producing a division of reproductive, sensory, perceptual, cognitive, and physical labor, imitation(physical), empathy(emotional), sympathy(mental), and language to serialize information transfer by continuous recursive disambiguation. 3) We have incrementally exhausted physical, social, cognitive, and soon, conceptual methods of adaptability – primarily through the extension of the period of developmental adaptability (neoteny), and through the evolution (development) of variation in languages and paradigms as systems of measurement (all language consists of measurements, and the paradigm we call science (testimony by realism, naturalism, operationalism, rational choice, reciprocity, completeness, and parsimony) is incrementally providing commensurability and coherence across those languages and paradigms, producing a universally commensurable language.) 4) This evolution of cooperation, gated by demand for volition, reciprocity, and proportionality, maintained (physical equilibrium), capitalization, and permitted the evolution of a Pareto distribution of abilities and influences (hierarchy of voluntary cooperation: a market), governed (regulated, computed) by the test of reciprocity within the limits of proportionality. 5) An adversarial (competitive) market is the fastest means of computation of possibility (opportunity for adaptability). An army is the fastest means of implementing changes. A religion is the least adaptive means of computation and implementation. 6) For this reason armies(states), laws(economies), and religions(education) each serve a LIMITED function in producing an INTERTEMPORAL DIVISION OF KNOWLEDGE AND LABOR. Armies when known and urgent, Markets when Unknown and not urgent, and Education to prepare for adaptability to the known and unknown. As such; 7) The european order is the maximum possible method yet known for adaptability at the cost of eugenic suppression of the unproductive, uncooperative, decapitalizing, and destructive. 8) And what we call IQ or intelligence is a measure of adaptability in time. It is the most rapid means of biological adaptability available to life forms. 9) With truth (scientific knowledge) as the most rapid tool of adaptability for applied intelligence. 10) However, given the distribution of the spectrum of cognitive adaptability (intelligence), to utilize the full spectrum of intelligence (maximize capitalization and adaptability) in the resulting division of labor (Pareto, or power law, hierarchy, of voluntary cooperation), conscientiousness is equally important at every point along the curve of adaptability (intelligence, IQ). For this reason, wealth at any point under the adaptability (IQ) curve will be available by the measure of conscientiousness (merit in the voluntary organization of an area under the curve). As such, the variation in intelligence, non-variation in conscientiousness, both serve the reproductive and intertemporal division of labor. While variation in conscientiousness – which we will call self-control, agency, or mindfulness depending on the context, provides utility along the spectrum, intelligence (the rate of adaptation) provides utility as the spectrum of complexity increases. However, the value of intelligence to the polity is not well understood. It conveys certain utilities: (a) greater detection of error, bias, and deceit as complexity increases, (b) greater incentive to profit from the detection of error, bias, and deceit, (c) the economic, social, and political value of those who profit from detection and suppression of error, bias, and deceit. In this sense, while there is certainly via-positiva value to intelligence, there is also via-negativa value to intelligence. And while via-positiva value may create innovation and opportunity, the value of suppressing error, bias, and deceit, appears to be more influential in a population than innovation. This is one of the fundamental lessons to take from western civilization. Because the greater the suppression of error, bias, and deceit, the more the collective population is limited to exploiting opportunities for truth and reciprocity, producing returns along the ENTIRE intellectual, socioal, political spectrum. As such truth provides a multiplier – and while it is the most counter-intuitive, difficult to produce, and expensive norm to create in a population, it is also the norm that provides the highest returns. For this reason, european civilization gravitated to the production of truth while others to harmony (china) or deception and ignorance (semitia).
Human Organization
7) There are three means of human coercion (organizing): … a) force (established male, k, capitalizing, conservative, armies, states), … b) remuneration (ascendant male, productive, libertarian, markets), … c) undermining, advocating (female/r/dysgenic, religion). The order in which discovers implements these institutions of coercion, then evolves and exhausts the opportunity for organizing societies by coercion, like any other evolutionary system, binds (limits) subsequent institutions. 8) Western civilization discovered rule of law (libertarian, markets) as the first institution. This discovery resulted in western tri-functionalism: a balance of power between army-state, law-commerce, and religion-family. All other civilizations discovered religion or state first, not law. As such they are not only different but they FAILED. They failed because by that first adaptation they established barriers to future adaptation. This we see the european militia-law and high-trust, the Chinese army-state and low trust, the Hindu religion and state and limited trust and the Semitic religion-vs-state and lowest trust. In effect, we have produced civilizations that specialized in the means of coercion while all other civilizations have failed even worse. 9) This institution of law the organizing foundation of european peoples. It provides the least resistance of a social organization to adaptation, and the most incentive to adapt both preventing negatives, and encouraging positives, by creating an adversarial market for the suppression of injustice (irreciprocity) and an adversarial market for consumption (reciprocity). And it’s the reason we evolved (adapted) FASTER than the rest even if we were not always first. So, Europeans (steppe herders) bypassed the agrarian age and like any leap in technology, one is not anchored by the prior technology (religion, agrarianism). It is this advantage that the world hates and wants to draw us backward.
Religion
Most conservatives and I differ on Christianity for this reason. Christianity was a useful means of extending the pagan pantheon such that peasants, women, children, serfs, and slaves had access to social status as material life improved under Roman commercial rule, especially since they were the one’s being domesticated through suppression of their reproduction. And especially for Semites who were familial, tribal, and practiced deceit as honorable (cunning) despite its consequences for the commons. However, as monotheistic, and constructed of the Abrahamic method of lying, Christianity sought to produce that status by dragging western civilization down into the ignorance and superstition of the middle east’s early religion and farmers and to reverse the european revolution in social organization, economic organization, political organization and thought (intellectual adaptation). There is zero difference in technique between the ‘bolshevik‘ Christianization of Rome, the bolshevik undermining of Spain, the bolshevik undermining of the Ukrainian Peoples (Pale), the bolshevik undermining of Germany, the bolshevik revolution in Russia, the postwar bolshevik revolution in America and Europe today, and the ‘safe haven’ for bolshevism provided by France (Paris), New York, Los Angeles, an London. There is no difference whatsoever between the supernatural deceits of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, and the pseudoscientific deceits of anti-science by Boaz, Freud, Marx, anti-markets by communism, socialism, and Keynesianism, anti culturalism by Gramsci-Adorno-Fromm’s neo-marxism, Friedan’s anti-male Jewish feminism, Derrida and Foucault’s sophistry with anti-scientific anti-truth Postmodernism and HBD Denialism, and anti-state and anti-commons rand-Rothbardian libertarianism, or anti-self-determination by Strauss, Kristol, and yes, Soros. The origins of organized religion on the steppe of the east Aryans, the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim revolts in the deserts, and the Jewish and Islamic revolts in the industrial age, are all variations on the same strategy: reversing adversarial( competitive-cooperative) evolution (adaptability) by continuous improvement of human adaptability, in physical, cognitive, informational, personal, interpersonal, social, economic, political, educational, and military spheres of opportunity for adaptation. This continuous ‘Bolshevik revolution’ (generalizing the specific term to apply to the historical strategy) seeks to reverse human evolution and produce yet another Jewish-Islamic-Christian dark age, as part of its thousands of years of revolt against the european (indo european) revolution in human evolution that produced markets in every aspect of life, producing rule of law, producing, reason, science, medicine, technology, and most importantly continuous eugenic evolution by the upward redistribution of reproduction that prevents regression to the mean (70’s). Why, because just as females seek to maintain infantilization of their offspring in order to maintain ease of control, the Semitic group strategy is to undermine host populations by the Abrahamic technique, weaponizing the strategy of females (seduction).

Neotenic Self Domestication

1-There are three human (H.Sapiens) races (subspecies). These subspecies adapted geographically. Their direction of adaptation is neotenic. Neoteny allows agency (cognitive adaptability), permitting the sequential social, linguistic (cognitive), and technical revolutions. 1 – The primary difference between human groups is the degree of neoteny. Neoteny preserves opportunity for developmental growth allowing for the development of the increasing agency. Neoteny is the product of selection for cooperation. intelligence is a byproduct of selecting for cooperation producing neoteny. 2-The climate in Africa and the population distribution resisted neotenic evolution. The climate in west Eurasia and distribution accelerated neotenic evolution. The climate in east Asian and limited distribution acclerated neotenic evolution. Groups speciated further. 3-The Agrarian revolution was a significant caloric advantage but homogenized populations. The cline in Asia was southward and beneficial, but in Eurasia was north and regressive. The Steppe revolution was a significant cultural advantage and homogenized populations(IE). 4-The manorial revolutions in northern Europe and northern China were a significant political revolution, restoring natural selection under agrarianism. The industrial revolution provided expansion but reversed natural (Neotenic) selection and was regressive. 5-The evolution of man is the story of the neotenic self-domestication of man, and the subsequent domestication of territories, plants, animals, metals, chemistry and now physical properties.

Human Groups

2 – Some groups have been the victim of circumstance that favored neotenic evolution. Some groups institutionalized neotenic evolution (eugenics) by accident. Some groups institutionalize neotenic evolution by design (eugenics). 3 – Class structures are the natural result of the competition between neotenic development, genetic load, health, and environment, with measurable consequences we call biological symmetry, absence of neuroticism(calm), conscientiousness, and intelligence. Class is the term we use for the spectrum of sexual, social, economic, political, military, and strategic market value. 4 – Any group that institutionalizes neotenic evolution (eugenics) will benefit from the fact that eugenics are the single most influential and desirable factor determining group quality of material life. Dysgenics are the single most desirable factor opposing material life in exchange for psychological life. Markets are naturally eugenic. Religion is the opposite. And serves largely to sedate us against evolutionary pressures as populations increase and with it, anonymity, irrelevance, and alienation. 5 – The second most influential difference between groups is the order of institutions. Europeans, for entirely environmental reasons, were the only people to develop Law – meaning the natural law(under our control) of tort (consisting of self-determination, sovereignty, property, and reciprocity) as their first social and political institution, instead of religion (out of our control) or state (under their control). And law is a purely empirical means of social organization. As we shall see, the order of institutional development like any evolutionary process creates evolutionary dependencies, that determine the future of civilizations. (See: Path Dependence) Law is the least evolutionarily contradictory political institution. Just as commerce is the least evolutionarily contradictory social order. Just as the Military is the least evolutionarily contradictory extra-political order. Just as science (Testimony) is the least evolutionarily contradictory intellectual order. 6 – The third most influential difference between groups is their ‘metaphysics’ or set of ‘paradigms’. Europeans, and specifically European aristocratic (Ruling) classes, for those entirely environmental reasons, and having developed empirical law as their first institution were alone the only people to discover, adapt to, and apply the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe. Despite the extraordinary high psychological cost of doing so. And the one cost East Asians alone would bear as well: the suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses and the direction of the surpluses to the production of commons. And in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, early mortality, in just a few centuries in the early bronze age, a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern world – while the middle east stagnated then declined in dysgenia, the Indians were unable to transform the continent, the Chinese, luckily isolated from the middle east succeeded then stagnated, leaving Europeans as the only people to succeed in the transition out of victimization by nature, and the universe, and instead to domesticate it. 7 – The fourth most influential difference between groups is their evolutionary strategy. ( … ) group strategies 6-The standard of living of civilizations is (was until 1950) a measure of the DENIAL of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, with the Europeans practicing the LEAST denial. 7 – If people have not passed thru sufficient neotenic domestication to survive by natural selection in markets(in the absence of immigration) then they are unfit for western civilization the entire structure of which is evolutionary.

Hostilities

8-The Left-Jewish-Islamist counter-revolution is DEVOLUTIONARY resistance to market domestication. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, Islam to reverse evolution. At present only China and the Slavs have the political system and will to resist devolution. 7 – Devolutionary Revolt: Both the Abrahamic Counter Revolutions of Christianity, Rabbinical Judaism, and Islam in the ancient world, and the Abrahamic counter-revolutions of Marxism, Bolshevism, Socialism, Postmodernism, Anti-Male Feminism, Human Difference Science Denialism, Political Correctness, and Anti-Westernism in the modern world, are revolts against the natural eugenics of the Aristocratic (European, Persian) peoples. The Abrahamic counter-revolution against the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, proposes the opposite circumstance: the expansion of the underclasses, and the deprivation of the commons, and a parasitic elite that benefits from capturing mankind in stagnation and decline. 8 – Just as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam brought about the first Abrahamic dark age of ignorance superstition, dysgenia, destruction, and eventual decline, the second Abrahamic dark age is in progress using the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and with the same results as every other civilization affected by Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: devolution by dysgenia and decline. 9 – Every group develops a strategy, mythology, paradigm (metaphysics), methodology of persuasion, and perpetuates it across generations. We are unconscious of these differences. But just as we can be universally taught logic, mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and economics, we can be taught how to speak truthfully, how to identify lies and frauds, and how to find mindfulness in truth and community rather than falsehood and deceits. 10 – It is possible to use common law of tort to prevent false promises in psychological, social, economic, and political fraud( informational) just as we prevent it in commercial (advertising, marketing, sales). And it is possible to institutionalize the suppression of that specific kind of fraud (baiting into hazard) just as we institutionalize the suppression of other kinds of baiting into hazard at the interpersonal scale (drugs, prostitution, crime, etc. 11 – It is possible to prevent another dark age, and possible to prevent the civil war that many of us are determined to wage to prevent that dark age if we cannot prevent it by more agreeable political means: peaceful separation, and restoration of the process of speciation.

The European Method of Truth

( … )
The Abrahamic Method of Deceit
The Institutionalization of Abrahamic Method of Deceit Militarizes the Female Means of Undermining as a Competitive Strategy. The false, unwarrantable, promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: … physical (scarcity) laws, … natural (reciprocity) laws, … evolutionary (regression to the mean) laws, thus: … baiting less able peoples into hazard (harm), … A harm advocated by Pilpul (sophistry, pseudoscience, supernaturalism), … Defended by Critique (undermining, not refuting, not providing competitive solution), … Evading Warranty, Escaping Liability and … By Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, … by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Given: … the Asymmetry of Knowledge, … the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s); … And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (proﬁt), Influence(power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of: … a Host Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating: … Accelerating Cycles of Internal Conﬂict, … Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker. The Semites, led by the Jews and their Abrahamic method of deception, which is as advanced a method of deceit as Aristotelianism is of truth, have spent thousands of years institutionalizing deception, fraud, organized crime, and in particular, organized crime against THE COMMONS (physical assets, formal and informal institutions) of host peoples. The purpose of their undermining is to reverse the high trust, and competitive advantage of superior peoples who developed eugenic civilization, that continues the adaptive progress of mankind. The Semites are not just different, they are not just worse, they are the and greatest cancer among the human populations. They are devolutionary. And their method of infection of the cognitively weak is as successful as the viruses we cannot defeat either. They are the origin of, and agents of, the Great Filter: the end of mankind.
Solutions
My goal is not, like the over 100 other countries in history, to expunge Abrahamists from politics (Christians) or from the market, society, and polity, (Jews, Muslims), or to kill them off, but instead to increase the scope of our laws to suppress the Abrahamic method of deceit by articulating the Aristotelian method of truth, such that all speech in public to the public in matters public must be truthful. If this is accomplished then it will be impossible for the jews, Christians, and Muslims using supernaturalism, or platonists with idealism, or Marxists, neo-Marxists, postmodernists, and difference, denialists to spread the Abrahamic false promises by the Abrahamic method of deceit. If instead of just grammar, logic, and rhetoric, we teach grammar, logic, testimony, and rhetoric, and we add basic economics and basic logic of the natural law of reciprocity, then within two generations we will achieve in psychological and social science what we have in physical sciences: the incremental eradication of the three primary methods of lying, the fictionalisms: supernaturalism (imaginary occult), super-normalism (verbal idealism and sophistry), and super-physicalism (physical magic and pseudoscience). This is an opportunity to bring the revolution in greek empiricism, in British science, German-American technology, and American biology, into a reformation of the linguistic, psychological, and social sciences, and to return western civilization to its continuous leadership of mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, diseased, and yes… DYSGENIA. We can continue to drag mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, despotism, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, disability, child mortality, early death, and the victimhood of a nature all but hostile to human life, at the geological, solar, galactic, and universal levels. And from there continue our ascent into the gods we imagine. Or we can have another dark age because that is what Judaism, Christianity, and Islam and their revisions in marxism, socialism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, and human difference denial seek to bring about through the restoration of ignorance, sophistry, superstition, pseudoscience, and dysgenia that destroy the information system that man depends upon to pass the Great Filter.

Understanding

—“ A wisdom literature provides advice for decisions and choices within the limits of a group’s evolutionary strategy within a group using that evolutionary strategy. A Theology provides an authoritarian wisdom literature, by false promise and false threat, conflating wisdom and law between competing group evolutionary strategies. An ideology serves to inspire individuals to action under democracy. A philosophy provides methods of choice in order to achieve a desired state of affairs. A formal logic provides language and grammar for the testing (falsification) of the internal consistency of verbal relations. A science provides a formal process(logical and physical instrumentation) decidability for the elimination of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit from our claims. Strictly constructed Natural Law unite formal logic and formal science to provide decidability in matters of dispute. ”— Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Sciences:

1. Formal(Logics: logic, mathematics, algorithmic, operational). 2. Physical (the laws of nature). 3. Psychological (cognitive science), and; 4. Social (Social science: economics, law, politics, group strategy). P-law is a formal, operational, and algorithmic logic using a universally commensurable grammar (paradigm, vocabulary, logic grammar syntax), that tests (falsifies) every possible dimension of thought: coherent (consistent, correspondent, existentially and operationally possible). Now, you might arbitrarily define ‘science’, but by any present definition P-law is scientific. It is logical, empirical, operational, and under realism, naturalism, rational choice, and reciprocity. Human Faculties (physical process) > Epistemology > Grammar > Vocabulary > Speech > Due Diligence > including Ethics. Faculties:

1. Sense, Integration by prediction 2. Space-Time Modeling prediction, 3. Auto Association prediction (intuition), Auto Evaluation (emotion), 4. Attention-Recursion, 5. Reason, Planning, Calculation, Computation, 6. Action-Release > Repeat.Epistemology: Observation > Free Association > Hypothesis (reason tested) > Theory (operationally tested), > Surviving Theory (market tested) > Limitation > Falsification > Repeat. In P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Paradigm and Vocabulary, grammar, logic, and syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum of those grammars. A Grammar: refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness. Vocabulary: Deflation and disambiguation by competition, operationalization, and serialization, ex: Moral: Evil < Bad < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good > Righteous. or Truth: Tautological < Analytic < Idea < Testifiable < Honest < Untested. Speech: Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limited to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence),and sets of transactions. Due Diligence: realism, naturalism, sensory, identity (categorical), internal (logical), operational (actions in time), external (empirical), rational (bounded rationality), reciprocal (moral – reciprocal rationality), limited, fully accounted, warranteed, restitutable. Ethics (Morality): Productive, Fully informed, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warrantied, by due diligence against error bias and deceit, within the limits of restitution. No more sophistry. Philosophy is closed. Science has fully replaced it. P-law is complete. Including Metaphysics, Epistemology, Psychology, Ethics, Sociology, Economics, Politics, Law, Group Strategy, and Aesthetics.

May 21, 2021
Conflict 1: Thesis

The Solution To the Problem of Our Age Requires We Address A Taboo.

THE PROBLEM All institutions lag. Of law (market), state (commons), and religion (tradition), law evolves fastest. But even so, law that is dependent upon tradition, even an empirical tradition, and lacking formal logical foundation, cannot reform without crisis – any more than familes, social organizations, commerical organiztins, the sciences, governments, or religions reform without crisis And we are in civilizational Crisis for just this reason: our law is lagging in reform. The failure of the law of tort to keep pace with inventions in parasitism and predation generates demand for the state to via-positiva impose rules of conduct instead of the law’s via-negativa prohibitions on conduct. The objective of my work the reformation of our traditional, empirical, evolutionary, common law and its foundation in the law of tort, and dependence upon the test of reciprocity into a strictly constructed, formal, operational logic like that of programming. Computers cannot choose and have no instincts of their own, so we program them with what they must do given the operations it is possible for them to perform. Conversely, man can choose and has instincts of his own, we must program man with what they must not do, given the operations it is possible for mankind to perform. If we are successful in evolving norms, we program man by training and environmental exposure with the positive alternatives to those actions we wish to program him not to perform. It is always better to reward the man for doing a good than threaten a man with consequences for doing a bad. And while we adapt our norms to encourage different alternatives to the bad, we have evolved the habit of expressly prohibiting the bad, and codifying those prohibitions in law, and using institutions to enforce those prohibitions. These laws convert social norms by which one can be ostracized to institutional ways by which one can be punished for doing bads. Where that law of Tort (or Trespass, or Property), is dependent upon the logical necessity and empirical evidence of the universal human demand for Reciprocity, and that tests of reciprocity provide man with universal decidability in matters of conflict. And where that demand for Reciprocity includes every action or inaction, and all display, word and deed. That means reciprocity in everything we can pay any cost for, directly or indirectly, by action or inaction, whether private, shared, or commons. And While reciprocity-in-deed is ancient and obvious, the novelty in my work is ( …. scope and speech and display ) in demanding Reciprocity in word, that requires testifiable, warrantable claims for which one is liable. This requirement causes us to pay an even greater self-monitoring cost (what we call agency) than does reciprocity-in-deed. And this has been a problem. We have tolerated free speech when we meant truthful, reciprocal, moral, and constructive speech. science invent techniques of observation (measurement) and logic (measurement), that exhaust our … So when I say that my work in Propertarianism’s P-Logic, and P-Law complete the scientific method, I mean, that the scientific method evolved from, and is an application of, our law of evidentiary testimony, by extending the logic of tort from claims over property disputes, to all claims about the universe, ( … suppressing all false claims not just false claims over …) And that P-Logic and P-Law extend the prohibition on the spectrum of techniques of deception: of Laziness in failure of due diligence against error and bias; undue influence by loading and framing, suggestion and obscurantism,; deception by the three fictionalisms of verbal sophistry-to-idealism, physical magic-to pseudoscience, and imaginary occult to supernaturalism; and outright deceit by false promise, fraud, baiting into hazard. THOUGHT LEADERSHIP As strange as it might seem, there are only two groups of thought leaders in this present world, the Europeans and the Half European Jews we call Ashkenazi. And the Europeans and the Askenazi have polar opposite genetic intuitions, cultural strategies, civilizational ambitions, and designs for man. And to not surprisingly these strategies are as opposite as the male and female reproductive strategies that these civilizations institutionalized as their group strategies – because that is the underlying difference between these group strategies: European Masculine superpredation by military, political, and economic construction, and Semitic Feminine superpredation by social and moral construction to resist it. Why? The difference between male meritocracy producing eugenics, and female equalitarianism producing dysgenics. That’s the underlying conflict between male and female strategies, that is only mitigated by parenthood and monogamy with enough children to unite sex differences in cognition. Or to put in more common terms, the instinct for men to join in a loyal hierarchy, and the instinct of women to preserve ease of manipulation by words and emotions (infantilism) – both instincts are demonstrated as overwhelmingly in the literature as they are by common experience. ( … TITLE … ) While the Aristotelian restoration caused the middle class to re-harmonized common law and rule of law in opposition to (corrupt) church thought and resulted in the anglo empirical restoration, beginning with the “enlightenment”: the French, then German, then Jewish, now Islamic and Chinese counter-revolutions against the anglo empirical, agrarian, financial, commercial, industrial, Darwinian, Scientific, and german second-scientific revolutions, only the Jewish revolution has been successful in surviving: Boaz-Freud-Marx-Lenin-Stalin, Cantor-Bohr, Gramsci-Frankfurt-Neomarxism, and Derrida-Friedan and the postmodernists, Mises-Rand-Rothbard and the libertarians, and the neoconservatives. This Almost exclusively Jewish counter-revolution is reducible to a revolt against Darwin, and Darwin’s implied explanatin for the success of western civilization, Nietzche’s restoration of european ethics, and the opportunity created by the failure of the church to either follow the orthodoxy into ritual, nationalism, and morals of the family, or modernize by completing the natural law project thus retaining the church’s position as a judicial authority over european civilization. Instead they tried to maintain the Augustine and Aquinas attempt to keep the church’s superstition out of direct competition with Aristotelian reason. Ths counter revolution repeats the same technique as the destruction of Roman civlization, it’s arts, letters, philosophy, wisdome, and technology from within by jewish insurrectionists that today we call Christians. But instead of a false promises of life after death, extension of familial love to non-kin, pretense of moral high ground, status from pretense of moral high ground, and freedom from social stimatism of inferiority to the aristocratic classes, in the modern world, the Marxists, Neo Marxists, Postmodernists, anti-male feminists, and human biodiversity science deniers, offer freedom from physical lawas of scarcity, natural laws of self interest and reciprocity, and evolutionary laws of the amorality of man, the domesticatin of man, and regression to the mean, if the evil european males are overthrown and another equalitarian age replaces it – which of course, will require additional false promises until the people have forgotten the meaning of truth itself. In the face of this predominantly jewish counter-revolution against wesetern civlization, the aristocracy, and the nobility, and the classes of the able, have held to their christian faith that the common folk would continue to suppress their wants and impulses, and retain their piety and civility and adherence to tradition despite the new plenty that gave them license. But this project we call democracy and mass consumption in order to defeat communism, failed. Worse, western man’s canon is distributed across hundreds of tomes across hundreds of decades, and as such was practiced as a tradition but not written down in consolidated form accessible to the masses until quite possibly the American constitution – for reasons I’ll explain further in this work. Yet we are faced with the rather obvious evidence of the superiority of western civilization at least since the Romans and Greeks, if not yet sure about the Aryans, but we have failed to preserve it with religion, we have failed to preserve it with philosophy, and we seem to have only preserved it with the military, juridical government, the family, and our juridical law: traditions rather than persuasions or religions. Although all four, in addition to our knowledge of history, have been under attack by the Jewish left, and that third of our population who are willing accomplices, for fourscore and ten years – to borrow a phrase. And the Jewish left and their willing accomplices, in particular, single women, less developed immigrants, and now Islamists – the same people who brought Christianity to Roman civilization and gave us the dark ages rather than roman restoration, and destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world, So over the past decades as our civilization crumbles from insurrection within, despite postwar suppression by the Jewish left, we’ve seen scientists attempt to rescue our civilization by providing the answers that we ourselves have failed to write down as canon: why did Europeans outperform all other peoples in this world combined, in just a few centuries in the Aryan expansion, a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern world – and why were the dark ages dark, and why didn’t we have the industrial revolution by within a few hundred years after Aristotle? Thanks to the combination of computers, science, cognitive science – meaning neurology, and genetics, we know some of the answers, but I’m going to try to provide the rest, as well as how to restore our civilization despite the repeated counter-revolutions against it which seek to destroy our civilization once again.

—“Western cultural uniqueness originates from two powerful currents—aristocratic individualism resulting from the Indo-European settlement beginning around 2500 BC, and egalitarian individualism originating from the primordial Northern hunter-gatherers that populated Europe since before the Ice Ages. This article describes the origins and culture of the Indo-Europeans.”– Kevin Macdonald

A look at the literature contains two major arguments: Genetic, cultural, and philosophical. I’m going to do what behavioral economists do, and examine the incentives given the genetic, geographic, demographic, adversarial, institutional, scientific, and technological, differences between peoples and cultures – and treat literature, including philosophy, as largely post-hoc justification. It’s justification for the seizure of incentives that already exist. It’s the incentives that are causal – and not open to the various loadings, framings, obscurantisms and deceits humans so commonly commit to prose. My only substantive improvement on Macdonald and Duchesne will be an explanation of the incentives and resulting institutions and a minor improvement on genetics and cognitive science that have evolved over the past few years. And in doing so we’ll create a coherent and complete story of the evolution of western civilization and why it’s unique, produces excellence, is unrepeatable, and irreplaceable whether genetic, conceptual or institutional – because it’s all three. All intellectuals work from a primary frame. My frame is cognitive science, behavioral economics, methods of argument (language), institutions, and group strategy. This is a ‘constructivist’, ‘operational’, ‘causal’ frame.

Thesis:

The Physics of Mankind: The Most Important Lesson You Can Understand Today

There is no ‘point’ to evolution other than profiting from entropy, and therefore persisting in the defeat of entropy. There is however opportunity in evolution for any that chooses to discover and use it. The framework we’re all looking for is this: 1) human evolution, incrementally exhausted opportunity for adaptability (physical morphological, (distribution of energy in our organs), metabolic, cooperative, social, cognitive, conceptual). The mammalian organism and the primate shape provide a platform for greater exhaustion of opportunity physical opportunity for adaptation. The cortex and braincase for sensation, integration, perception, prediction (imagination), cognition, neural density; exhausting cooperative opportunity through memory, prediction, and intuition for reciprocity; neoteny exhausting the opportunity for the development of agency, and biochemistry is very close to maximizing velocity; and systems of measurement (sciences) exhausting the possibilities for cognitive coherence. Upon solving the remaining sciences what remains is the exhaustion of cellular repairability internally, the opportunities for direct enhancement of physical form through manipulation internally, and the available sources of energy externally. 2) Evolutionary computation by trial and error achieved this adaptation, and adaptation through a distribution (distributed variation) of traits producing a division of reproductive, sensory, perceptual, cognitive, and physical labor, imitation(physical), empathy(emotional), sympathy(mental), and language to serialize information transfer by continuous recursive disambiguation. 3) We have incrementally exhausted physical, social, cognitive, and soon, conceptual methods of adaptability – primarily through the extension of the period of developmental adaptability (neoteny), and through the evolution (development) of variation in languages and paradigms as systems of measurement (all language consists of measurements, and the paradigm we call science (testimony by realism, naturalism, operationalism, rational choice, reciprocity, completeness, and parsimony) is incrementally providing commensurability and coherence across those languages and paradigms, producing a universally commensurable language.) 4) This evolution of cooperation, gated by demand for volition, reciprocity, and proportionality, maintained (physical equilibrium), capitalization, and permitted the evolution of a Pareto distribution of abilities and influences (hierarchy of voluntary cooperation: a market), governed (regulated, computed) by the test of reciprocity within the limits of proportionality. 5) An adversarial (competitive) market is the fastest means of computation of possibility (opportunity for adaptability). An army is the fastest means of implementing changes. A religion is the least adaptive means of computation and implementation. 6) For this reason armies(states), laws(economies), and religions(education) each serve a LIMITED function in producing an INTERTEMPORAL DIVISION OF KNOWLEDGE AND LABOR. Armies when known and urgent, Markets when Unknown and not urgent, and Education to prepare for adaptability to the known and unknown. As such; 7) The european order is the maximum possible method yet known for adaptability at the cost of eugenic suppression of the unproductive, uncooperative, decapitalizing, and destructive. 8) And what we call IQ or intelligence is a measure of adaptability in time. It is the most rapid means of biological adaptability available to life forms. 9) With truth (scientific knowledge) as the most rapid tool of adaptability for applied intelligence. 10) However, given the distribution of the spectrum of cognitive adaptability (intelligence), to utilize the full spectrum of intelligence (maximize capitalization and adaptability) in the resulting division of labor (Pareto, or power law, hierarchy, of voluntary cooperation), conscientiousness is equally important at every point along the curve of adaptability (intelligence, IQ). For this reason, wealth at any point under the adaptability (IQ) curve will be available by the measure of conscientiousness (merit in the voluntary organization of an area under the curve). As such, the variation in intelligence, non-variation in conscientiousness, both serve the reproductive and intertemporal division of labor. While variation in conscientiousness – which we will call self-control, agency, or mindfulness depending on the context, provides utility along the spectrum, intelligence (the rate of adaptation) provides utility as the spectrum of complexity increases. However, the value of intelligence to the polity is not well understood. It conveys certain utilities: (a) greater detection of error, bias, and deceit as complexity increases, (b) greater incentive to profit from the detection of error, bias, and deceit, (c) the economic, social, and political value of those who profit from detection and suppression of error, bias, and deceit. In this sense, while there is certainly via-positiva value to intelligence, there is also via-negativa value to intelligence. And while via-positiva value may create innovation and opportunity, the value of suppressing error, bias, and deceit, appears to be more influential in a population than innovation. This is one of the fundamental lessons to take from western civilization. Because the greater the suppression of error, bias, and deceit, the more the collective population is limited to exploiting opportunities for truth and reciprocity, producing returns along the ENTIRE intellectual, socioal, political spectrum. As such truth provides a multiplier – and while it is the most counter-intuitive, difficult to produce, and expensive norm to create in a population, it is also the norm that provides the highest returns. For this reason, european civilization gravitated to the production of truth while others to harmony (china) or deception and ignorance (semitia).
Human Organization
7) There are three means of human coercion (organizing): … a) force (established male, k, capitalizing, conservative, armies, states), … b) remuneration (ascendant male, productive, libertarian, markets), … c) undermining, advocating (female/r/dysgenic, religion). The order in which discovers implements these institutions of coercion, then evolves and exhausts the opportunity for organizing societies by coercion, like any other evolutionary system, binds (limits) subsequent institutions. 8) Western civilization discovered rule of law (libertarian, markets) as the first institution. This discovery resulted in western tri-functionalism: a balance of power between army-state, law-commerce, and religion-family. All other civilizations discovered religion or state first, not law. As such they are not only different but they FAILED. They failed because by that first adaptation they established barriers to future adaptation. This we see the european militia-law and high-trust, the Chinese army-state and low trust, the Hindu religion and state and limited trust and the Semitic religion-vs-state and lowest trust. In effect, we have produced civilizations that specialized in the means of coercion while all other civilizations have failed even worse. 9) This institution of law the organizing foundation of european peoples. It provides the least resistance of a social organization to adaptation, and the most incentive to adapt both preventing negatives, and encouraging positives, by creating an adversarial market for the suppression of injustice (irreciprocity) and an adversarial market for consumption (reciprocity). And it’s the reason we evolved (adapted) FASTER than the rest even if we were not always first. So, Europeans (steppe herders) bypassed the agrarian age and like any leap in technology, one is not anchored by the prior technology (religion, agrarianism). It is this advantage that the world hates and wants to draw us backward.
Religion
Most conservatives and I differ on Christianity for this reason. Christianity was a useful means of extending the pagan pantheon such that peasants, women, children, serfs, and slaves had access to social status as material life improved under Roman commercial rule, especially since they were the one’s being domesticated through suppression of their reproduction. And especially for Semites who were familial, tribal, and practiced deceit as honorable (cunning) despite its consequences for the commons. However, as monotheistic, and constructed of the Abrahamic method of lying, Christianity sought to produce that status by dragging western civilization down into the ignorance and superstition of the middle east’s early religion and farmers and to reverse the european revolution in social organization, economic organization, political organization and thought (intellectual adaptation). There is zero difference in technique between the ‘bolshevik‘ Christianization of Rome, the bolshevik undermining of Spain, the bolshevik undermining of the Ukrainian Peoples (Pale), the bolshevik undermining of Germany, the bolshevik revolution in Russia, the postwar bolshevik revolution in America and Europe today, and the ‘safe haven’ for bolshevism provided by France (Paris), New York, Los Angeles, an London. There is no difference whatsoever between the supernatural deceits of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, and the pseudoscientific deceits of anti-science by Boaz, Freud, Marx, anti-markets by communism, socialism, and Keynesianism, anti culturalism by Gramsci-Adorno-Fromm’s neo-marxism, Friedan’s anti-male Jewish feminism, Derrida and Foucault’s sophistry with anti-scientific anti-truth Postmodernism and HBD Denialism, and anti-state and anti-commons rand-Rothbardian libertarianism, or anti-self-determination by Strauss, Kristol, and yes, Soros. The origins of organized religion on the steppe of the east Aryans, the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim revolts in the deserts, and the Jewish and Islamic revolts in the industrial age, are all variations on the same strategy: reversing adversarial( competitive-cooperative) evolution (adaptability) by continuous improvement of human adaptability, in physical, cognitive, informational, personal, interpersonal, social, economic, political, educational, and military spheres of opportunity for adaptation. This continuous ‘Bolshevik revolution’ (generalizing the specific term to apply to the historical strategy) seeks to reverse human evolution and produce yet another Jewish-Islamic-Christian dark age, as part of its thousands of years of revolt against the european (indo european) revolution in human evolution that produced markets in every aspect of life, producing rule of law, producing, reason, science, medicine, technology, and most importantly continuous eugenic evolution by the upward redistribution of reproduction that prevents regression to the mean (70’s). Why, because just as females seek to maintain infantilization of their offspring in order to maintain ease of control, the Semitic group strategy is to undermine host populations by the Abrahamic technique, weaponizing the strategy of females (seduction).

Neotenic Self Domestication

1-There are three human (H.Sapiens) races (subspecies). These subspecies adapted geographically. Their direction of adaptation is neotenic. Neoteny allows agency (cognitive adaptability), permitting the sequential social, linguistic (cognitive), and technical revolutions. 1 – The primary difference between human groups is the degree of neoteny. Neoteny preserves opportunity for developmental growth allowing for the development of the increasing agency. Neoteny is the product of selection for cooperation. intelligence is a byproduct of selecting for cooperation producing neoteny. 2-The climate in Africa and the population distribution resisted neotenic evolution. The climate in west Eurasia and distribution accelerated neotenic evolution. The climate in east Asian and limited distribution acclerated neotenic evolution. Groups speciated further. 3-The Agrarian revolution was a significant caloric advantage but homogenized populations. The cline in Asia was southward and beneficial, but in Eurasia was north and regressive. The Steppe revolution was a significant cultural advantage and homogenized populations(IE). 4-The manorial revolutions in northern Europe and northern China were a significant political revolution, restoring natural selection under agrarianism. The industrial revolution provided expansion but reversed natural (Neotenic) selection and was regressive. 5-The evolution of man is the story of the neotenic self-domestication of man, and the subsequent domestication of territories, plants, animals, metals, chemistry and now physical properties.

Human Groups

2 – Some groups have been the victim of circumstance that favored neotenic evolution. Some groups institutionalized neotenic evolution (eugenics) by accident. Some groups institutionalize neotenic evolution by design (eugenics). 3 – Class structures are the natural result of the competition between neotenic development, genetic load, health, and environment, with measurable consequences we call biological symmetry, absence of neuroticism(calm), conscientiousness, and intelligence. Class is the term we use for the spectrum of sexual, social, economic, political, military, and strategic market value. 4 – Any group that institutionalizes neotenic evolution (eugenics) will benefit from the fact that eugenics are the single most influential and desirable factor determining group quality of material life. Dysgenics are the single most desirable factor opposing material life in exchange for psychological life. Markets are naturally eugenic. Religion is the opposite. And serves largely to sedate us against evolutionary pressures as populations increase and with it, anonymity, irrelevance, and alienation. 5 – The second most influential difference between groups is the order of institutions. Europeans, for entirely environmental reasons, were the only people to develop Law – meaning the natural law(under our control) of tort (consisting of self-determination, sovereignty, property, and reciprocity) as their first social and political institution, instead of religion (out of our control) or state (under their control). And law is a purely empirical means of social organization. As we shall see, the order of institutional development like any evolutionary process creates evolutionary dependencies, that determine the future of civilizations. (See: Path Dependence) Law is the least evolutionarily contradictory political institution. Just as commerce is the least evolutionarily contradictory social order. Just as the Military is the least evolutionarily contradictory extra-political order. Just as science (Testimony) is the least evolutionarily contradictory intellectual order. 6 – The third most influential difference between groups is their ‘metaphysics’ or set of ‘paradigms’. Europeans, and specifically European aristocratic (Ruling) classes, for those entirely environmental reasons, and having developed empirical law as their first institution were alone the only people to discover, adapt to, and apply the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe. Despite the extraordinary high psychological cost of doing so. And the one cost East Asians alone would bear as well: the suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses and the direction of the surpluses to the production of commons. And in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, early mortality, in just a few centuries in the early bronze age, a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern world – while the middle east stagnated then declined in dysgenia, the Indians were unable to transform the continent, the Chinese, luckily isolated from the middle east succeeded then stagnated, leaving Europeans as the only people to succeed in the transition out of victimization by nature, and the universe, and instead to domesticate it. 7 – The fourth most influential difference between groups is their evolutionary strategy. ( … ) group strategies 6-The standard of living of civilizations is (was until 1950) a measure of the DENIAL of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, with the Europeans practicing the LEAST denial. 7 – If people have not passed thru sufficient neotenic domestication to survive by natural selection in markets(in the absence of immigration) then they are unfit for western civilization the entire structure of which is evolutionary.

Hostilities

8-The Left-Jewish-Islamist counter-revolution is DEVOLUTIONARY resistance to market domestication. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, Islam to reverse evolution. At present only China and the Slavs have the political system and will to resist devolution. 7 – Devolutionary Revolt: Both the Abrahamic Counter Revolutions of Christianity, Rabbinical Judaism, and Islam in the ancient world, and the Abrahamic counter-revolutions of Marxism, Bolshevism, Socialism, Postmodernism, Anti-Male Feminism, Human Difference Science Denialism, Political Correctness, and Anti-Westernism in the modern world, are revolts against the natural eugenics of the Aristocratic (European, Persian) peoples. The Abrahamic counter-revolution against the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, proposes the opposite circumstance: the expansion of the underclasses, and the deprivation of the commons, and a parasitic elite that benefits from capturing mankind in stagnation and decline. 8 – Just as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam brought about the first Abrahamic dark age of ignorance superstition, dysgenia, destruction, and eventual decline, the second Abrahamic dark age is in progress using the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and with the same results as every other civilization affected by Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: devolution by dysgenia and decline. 9 – Every group develops a strategy, mythology, paradigm (metaphysics), methodology of persuasion, and perpetuates it across generations. We are unconscious of these differences. But just as we can be universally taught logic, mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and economics, we can be taught how to speak truthfully, how to identify lies and frauds, and how to find mindfulness in truth and community rather than falsehood and deceits. 10 – It is possible to use common law of tort to prevent false promises in psychological, social, economic, and political fraud( informational) just as we prevent it in commercial (advertising, marketing, sales). And it is possible to institutionalize the suppression of that specific kind of fraud (baiting into hazard) just as we institutionalize the suppression of other kinds of baiting into hazard at the interpersonal scale (drugs, prostitution, crime, etc. 11 – It is possible to prevent another dark age, and possible to prevent the civil war that many of us are determined to wage to prevent that dark age if we cannot prevent it by more agreeable political means: peaceful separation, and restoration of the process of speciation.

The European Method of Truth

( … )
The Abrahamic Method of Deceit
The Institutionalization of Abrahamic Method of Deceit Militarizes the Female Means of Undermining as a Competitive Strategy. The false, unwarrantable, promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: … physical (scarcity) laws, … natural (reciprocity) laws, … evolutionary (regression to the mean) laws, thus: … baiting less able peoples into hazard (harm), … A harm advocated by Pilpul (sophistry, pseudoscience, supernaturalism), … Defended by Critique (undermining, not refuting, not providing competitive solution), … Evading Warranty, Escaping Liability and … By Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, … by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Given: … the Asymmetry of Knowledge, … the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s); … And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (proﬁt), Influence(power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of: … a Host Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating: … Accelerating Cycles of Internal Conﬂict, … Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker. The Semites, led by the Jews and their Abrahamic method of deception, which is as advanced a method of deceit as Aristotelianism is of truth, have spent thousands of years institutionalizing deception, fraud, organized crime, and in particular, organized crime against THE COMMONS (physical assets, formal and informal institutions) of host peoples. The purpose of their undermining is to reverse the high trust, and competitive advantage of superior peoples who developed eugenic civilization, that continues the adaptive progress of mankind. The Semites are not just different, they are not just worse, they are the and greatest cancer among the human populations. They are devolutionary. And their method of infection of the cognitively weak is as successful as the viruses we cannot defeat either. They are the origin of, and agents of, the Great Filter: the end of mankind.
Solutions
My goal is not, like the over 100 other countries in history, to expunge Abrahamists from politics (Christians) or from the market, society, and polity, (Jews, Muslims), or to kill them off, but instead to increase the scope of our laws to suppress the Abrahamic method of deceit by articulating the Aristotelian method of truth, such that all speech in public to the public in matters public must be truthful. If this is accomplished then it will be impossible for the jews, Christians, and Muslims using supernaturalism, or platonists with idealism, or Marxists, neo-Marxists, postmodernists, and difference, denialists to spread the Abrahamic false promises by the Abrahamic method of deceit. If instead of just grammar, logic, and rhetoric, we teach grammar, logic, testimony, and rhetoric, and we add basic economics and basic logic of the natural law of reciprocity, then within two generations we will achieve in psychological and social science what we have in physical sciences: the incremental eradication of the three primary methods of lying, the fictionalisms: supernaturalism (imaginary occult), super-normalism (verbal idealism and sophistry), and super-physicalism (physical magic and pseudoscience). This is an opportunity to bring the revolution in greek empiricism, in British science, German-American technology, and American biology, into a reformation of the linguistic, psychological, and social sciences, and to return western civilization to its continuous leadership of mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, diseased, and yes… DYSGENIA. We can continue to drag mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, despotism, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, disability, child mortality, early death, and the victimhood of a nature all but hostile to human life, at the geological, solar, galactic, and universal levels. And from there continue our ascent into the gods we imagine. Or we can have another dark age because that is what Judaism, Christianity, and Islam and their revisions in marxism, socialism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, and human difference denial seek to bring about through the restoration of ignorance, sophistry, superstition, pseudoscience, and dysgenia that destroy the information system that man depends upon to pass the Great Filter.

Understanding

—“ A wisdom literature provides advice for decisions and choices within the limits of a group’s evolutionary strategy within a group using that evolutionary strategy. A Theology provides an authoritarian wisdom literature, by false promise and false threat, conflating wisdom and law between competing group evolutionary strategies. An ideology serves to inspire individuals to action under democracy. A philosophy provides methods of choice in order to achieve a desired state of affairs. A formal logic provides language and grammar for the testing (falsification) of the internal consistency of verbal relations. A science provides a formal process(logical and physical instrumentation) decidability for the elimination of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit from our claims. Strictly constructed Natural Law unite formal logic and formal science to provide decidability in matters of dispute. ”— Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Sciences:

1. Formal(Logics: logic, mathematics, algorithmic, operational). 2. Physical (the laws of nature). 3. Psychological (cognitive science), and; 4. Social (Social science: economics, law, politics, group strategy). P-law is a formal, operational, and algorithmic logic using a universally commensurable grammar (paradigm, vocabulary, logic grammar syntax), that tests (falsifies) every possible dimension of thought: coherent (consistent, correspondent, existentially and operationally possible). Now, you might arbitrarily define ‘science’, but by any present definition P-law is scientific. It is logical, empirical, operational, and under realism, naturalism, rational choice, and reciprocity. Human Faculties (physical process) > Epistemology > Grammar > Vocabulary > Speech > Due Diligence > including Ethics. Faculties:

1. Sense, Integration by prediction 2. Space-Time Modeling prediction, 3. Auto Association prediction (intuition), Auto Evaluation (emotion), 4. Attention-Recursion, 5. Reason, Planning, Calculation, Computation, 6. Action-Release > Repeat.Epistemology: Observation > Free Association > Hypothesis (reason tested) > Theory (operationally tested), > Surviving Theory (market tested) > Limitation > Falsification > Repeat. In P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Paradigm and Vocabulary, grammar, logic, and syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum of those grammars. A Grammar: refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness. Vocabulary: Deflation and disambiguation by competition, operationalization, and serialization, ex: Moral: Evil < Bad < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good > Righteous. or Truth: Tautological < Analytic < Idea < Testifiable < Honest < Untested. Speech: Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limited to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence),and sets of transactions. Due Diligence: realism, naturalism, sensory, identity (categorical), internal (logical), operational (actions in time), external (empirical), rational (bounded rationality), reciprocal (moral – reciprocal rationality), limited, fully accounted, warranteed, restitutable. Ethics (Morality): Productive, Fully informed, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warrantied, by due diligence against error bias and deceit, within the limits of restitution. No more sophistry. Philosophy is closed. Science has fully replaced it. P-law is complete. Including Metaphysics, Epistemology, Psychology, Ethics, Sociology, Economics, Politics, Law, Group Strategy, and Aesthetics.

May 21, 2021

Conflict 2: The Evolutionary Stage

Our World

Terrain of the World

The World During the Ice Age

For our purposes note (a) the absence of the north sea, (b) the closure of the red sea, (c) the absence of the persian gulf, (d) the ability to reach australia, (e) the ability to reach the americas and (f) the size of the caspian sea, and (g) the size and number of large lakes in Africa. In other words, walking across the planet is possible.

The Next Ice Age

According to Milankovitch theory, the advent of the ice age depends on the coincidence of the following three conditions:

Elongation or eccentricity: Eccentricity is the shape of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. It is constantly fluctuating with the orbital shape ranging between more and less elliptical, every 100,000 years. This alters the distance from the Earth to the Sun which in turn reduces or increases the amount of radiation received at the Earth’s surface in different seasons. The northern hemisphere experiences winter while the southern hemisphere experiences summer at perihelion position, which is the position where the distance between the earth and the sun is the least. The opposite happens at the aphelion position which is the position where the distance between the earth and the sun is the most. The solar energy received at the perihelion is 20-30% more than the energy received at the aphelion position. These fluctuations around the globe result in prominent changes in the Earth’s climate and glacial regimes. This means that the winter experienced at the aphelion would be bitter and due to the slow rotation of the earth at the aphelion (as per calculations based on Kepler’s second law), the winter would get more time to strengthen itself. For example, the glaciers from the north may start to extend southwards.

Rotation of Precession: While the bottom part of a top is spinning, the top part also sort of revolves. The earth spins like a spinning top on its axis, while its axis also sort of revolves. It takes 26,000 years to complete one such revolution. Because of this movement, we notice the change in the night sky during different seasons. If you compare the night sky of summer in the northern hemisphere today to the night sky of summer in the northern hemisphere 5,000 years ago, it will be very different. When the precession of equinoxes sends the glaciations-prone northern hemisphere to the aphelion position, the winter becomes fierce, freezing the arctic and most of the northern hemisphere.

Tilt or Obliquity: Currently, the tilt of the earth’s axis or its obliquity is at 23.5 degrees. But every 41,000 years, the obliquity shifts between low (22.1 degrees) to high (24.5 degrees). When the obliquity is at its lowest, the higher latitudes don’t receive much sunlight, leading to increase in ice cover over these latitudes.
According to the Milankovitch criteria, to predict the next ice age, we can use the above information and find out when the next ice age is due. The earth’s orbit is almost circular today and 10,000 years from now, the orbit will be an ellipse. Obliquity will be at its lowest in 12,000 years from today while the precession would have reversed in almost10,000 years. So, we can predict that almost 10 to 12 thousand years from now, a new ice age may begin.

The Problem of Prediction: Only 11,000 years have passed since the last Ice Age, so scientists cannot be certain that humans are indeed living in a post-glacial epoch instead of an interglacial period of the Pleistocene and thus due for another ice age in the near geologic future. It’s possible that an increase in global temperature, as we’re experiencing now, could be a sign of an impending ice age and could actually increase the amount of ice on the earth’s surface. Why? Because the cold, dry air above the Arctic and Antarctica carries little moisture and drops little snow on the regions. An increase in global temperature could increase the amount of moisture in the air and increase the amount of snowfall. After years of more snowfall than melting, the polar regions could accumulate more ice. An accumulation of ice would lead to a lowering of the level of the oceans and there would be further, unanticipated changes in the global climate system as well.

Conclusion: The next ice age will occurr anytime between immediately and ten thousand years from now.

Precipitation Around The World

To serve our purposes this map could be a little clearer, but notice that the earth’s wobbles but it’s tilt is 23 degrees at present, and the pattern of precipitation is 12 degrees. This means that with normal ocean rotation, western europe is warmer and wetter, and east asia is colder and drier. Meanwhile, between the solar radiation across Saharan africa the arabian peninsula, central asia, and the himalayas, the rotation of the earth, the pitch of the earth, and the circulatory patterns of the oceans, that glaciation, cold, temperate and hot climates are distributed unevenly.

Fresh Water – Rivers of the World

In an effort to illustrate the many rivers and streams of the fertile world, in contrast with the drier regions, this map crosses over into overrepresentation of smaller rivers and undrerepresentation of the major rivers. That said, the point we want to make is that while we live in an agrarian age, and we live in a land of territorial states, that mankind evolved near, and populated the world, by following waterways. Not just because mankind requires fresh water, but because the animals we fed on from the fish in the waters, to those that came to drink from it did also.

Transportation – Navigable Rivers of the World

Illustrating those many waterways obscures the difference between rivers that provide fresh water, rivers that are navigable (provide transport), and rivers that provide sufficient water for widespread seasonal irrigation, and those that supply sufficient irrigation that they can sustain civilizations dependent upon widespread river-irrigation. This better illustrates the main waterways that make civilization possible.

Arable Land of the World

Less than five percent of the planet consists of arable land. The rest is artic, tundra, desert, or mountainous, or otherwise difficult to farm. Note the concentrations in china, india, europe, and north america versus south america, africa, australia and east central asia.

Soil Quality Around The World

This map of soil quality provides a bit more precision than the one above for those areas that are arable, but gives the wrong impression otherwise. I’ve added it here to show the difference between sout asia (india), se asia, and particularly northeast china to call attention to the fact that the high population of these regions isn’t cultural it’s geographic.

Climate Around The World

Solar Radiation Around The World

The Continents: The dark orange area at 1500 kWh/m^2, is largely between 35 degrees and 60 degrees latitude, with southern china extending south to 20 degrees.

The Planet: The map of the full planet shows us the oceans as well. The red hot-spots are the Andes mountans in south america and the Himalayan mountains in South Asia from Pakistan (old India), to India, Nepal, and Bangladesh in the south, and Tibet in the north.

Continents of the World

Regions of the World

Subregions of the World

Southwest Asia, subregion of Asia, bounded on the west by the Mediterranean Sea, the Sinai Peninsula, and the Red Sea and on the south and southeast by the Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf. The region reaches the Caspian Sea and the Black Sea to the north.

Genetics of the World

Races of the World

–Southern Eurasian

-Indo-Aryan: The majority of peoples of Northern India, Eastern Pakistan, Southern Nepal and Bangladesh. Ex. Marathi, Bengali, Punjabi
-Dardic: Peoples of the Kashmir and Nuristan region, technically belonging to the Indo-Aryan family, yet contain admixture from a pre-Iranian, most likely Scythian source, giving them an appearance in stark contrast to their neighbors. Ex. Kashmiri, Pashayi, Nuristani
-Romani: Nomadic peoples residing primarily in Southeastern Europe, also known as Roma, Gypsies, Romany or Domari1 in the Middle East.
-Dravidian: The majority of peoples of Southern India and Northern Sri Lanka, predating the Indo-Aryans of Northern India. Ex. Tamil, Telugu, Malayali
-Munda: Austro-Asiatic speakers of India with partial Southeast Asian ancestry.
-South Arabian: Not actually a South Asian group, but believed by many to have a pre-Semitic Veddoid or Australoid origin. Ex. Mehri, Shehri, Soqotri

–Northwest Eurasian

-Italic: Also known as speakers of the Romance family, originating in the Italian peninsula and spreading across Europe during the Roman era. Ex. Italian, Spanish, French
-Germanic: People originating in Southern Scandinavia and spreading to Germany, England and other areas of Europe. Ex. German, Dutch, English
-Slavic: Peoples originating in Eastern Europe, greatly expanding to dominate much of the Balkans and Northern Asia. Ex. Russian, Polish, Serb
-Celtic: Peoples pre-dating the Latinization and Germanicization of much of Western Europe, mostly lying on the fringes of the British Isles2 today. Ex. Scottish, Irish, Breton
-Baltic: Peoples lying in the Baltic region, related to, but separate from Slavs. Ex. Latvian, Lithuanian
-Albanian: People group lying in the Balkan peninsula, believed to be the last surviving group of it’s branch.
-Hellenic: One of the more ancient groups, lying on the fringes of the European continent in both Greece and Cyprus.
-Uralic: Descendants (at least partially) of peoples from the Ural mountain region in modern Russia, now located in Europe. Ex. Hungarian, Finnish, Estonian
-Gagauz: The only Christianized Turkic peoples of the Balkans lying mostly in Moldova and Ukraine.
-Maltese: The only Christianized Semitic peoples, located on an island off the coast of Sicily.
-Basque: People group lying in the Iberian peninsula, believed to be the last surviving group of it’s branch.
-Castizo: Description used in Mexico and other areas of Latin America to describe those of predominately European (mostly Spanish) ancestry, with some Amerindian admixture.

–Southwest Eurasian

-Semitic: Largest sub-section of the Afro-Asiatic family, originating in the Arabian peninsula and spreading throughout much of the Middle East and North Africa3. Ex. Arab, Assyrian
-Berber: Pre-Semitic peoples of the Maghreb, many of whom have begrudgingly accepted the Arabic language. Ex. Kabyle, Taureg, Riffian
-Turkic: Descendants of the Turkic invasions of the Middle East, although the Northern Eurasian admixture is fairly limited today. Ex. Turk, Azeri, Kabardian
-Caucasian: Peoples lying within the Caucasus4 mountain region who pre-date any foreign invasions. Ex. Armenian, Georgian, Chechen
-Iranian: Peoples of the Iranian plateau stretching from Southeast Anatolia to the Pamiri mountain range in China. Ex. Persian, Kurd, Pashtun
-Jewish: Semitic peoples originating in Judea, forced to scatter around the Mediterranean during the Roman era.

–Eastern Eurasian

-Sinitic: Largest group in the Far East, better known as Han Chinese.
-Altaic: Only part of a controversial grouping of peoples in East Asia. Ex. Japanese, Korean, Mongol
-Tibeto-Burman: People groups related to the Chinese lying on the Tibetan plateau, much of Northeast India and the country of Myanmar. Ex. Tibetan, Bamar, Balti
-Tai-Kadai: Peoples spread throughout Southeast Asia and Southern China. Ex. Thai, Lao, Shan
-Austro-Asiatic: Peoples lying mostly in the former French Indochina. Ex. Vietnamese, Khmer, Mon
-Austronesian: Peoples originating in a migration from the island of Taiwan into maritime Southeast Asia. Ex. Malay, Tagalog, Javanese
-Hmong-Mien: Peoples sporadically scattered throughout Northern Southeast Asia and Southern China.
-Turanid: Archaic term for those of Turkic Central Asian decent, of mixed European, Middle Eastern and East Asian decent. Ex. Kazakh, Uzbek, Turkmen
-Siberian: Peoples of North Asia not linguistically related, but retain many of the same haplogroups, suggesting a common origin. Ex. Yakut, Chukchi, Evenk

–African

-Cushitic: Afro-Asiatic peoples dominant in Ethiopia in terms of numbers. Ex. Oromo, Afar, Somali
-Habesha: Semitic peoples historically dominant in Ethiopia and Eritrea. Ex. Tigrinya, Tigre, Amhara
-Omotic: Afro-Asiatic peoples lying in Southwest Ethiopia. Ex. Wolaytta, Bench, Oyda
-Chadic: Afro-Asiatic peoples ironically lying mostly to the West of Chad.
-Nilotic: Dark-skinned, lanky peoples of the Southern Nile in Sudan and East Africa. Nuer, Acholi, Dinka
-Sudanic: Other members of the Nilo-Saharan family lying mostly in Chad (ironically). Ex. Fur, Kanuri, Songai
-Khoisan: Dubious grouping of pre-Bantoid peoples lying mostly in the countries of Namibia, Botswana and South Africa.
-Pygmy: Pre-Bantoid short-statured peoples lying in Central Africa nearing extinction.
-Nigritic: Controversial grouping of Niger-Congo speaking peoples in West Africa. Ex. Yoruba, Igbo, Akan
-Bantu: Descendants of migrants from Cameroon who spread out across Africa South of the equator. Ex. Xhosa, Zulu, Shona
-Swahili: Speakers of the Bantoid Swahili language, but with significant Cushitic, Arabic and Persian influence over the last few centuries.
-Black American: Descendants of former slaves brought to Northern America from 1500-1700.
-Afro-Caribbean: Descendants of former slaves brought to the Caribbean during the same time period, with groups on the mainland of the Americas as well. Ex. Jamaican, Barbadian, Trinidadian
-Afro-Latino: Descendants of former slaves brought to Latin America, with significant Amerindian and European admixture because of the nature of early colonial Latino societies.

–Amerindian

-Eskimo-Aleut: Peoples of the far North of Canada and Alaska, descended from a later group of migrants from Siberia. Ex. Inuit, Aleut
-Northern: Indigenous peoples of the United States and Canada other than Inuits. Ex. Apache, Comanche, Creek
-Central: Indigenous peoples of Mexico and Central America, who still exist in large numbers in the interior. Ex. Mayan, Nahuatl (Aztec)
-Southern: Indigenous peoples of most of the South American continent. Ex. Quechua. Aymara, Mapuche
-Paleo: Oldest surviving Amerindian peoples5, located in the far south of Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego, postulated to have possible minor Melanesian admixture. Ex. Yaghan

–Oceanian

Papuan: Indigenous peoples of the island of New Guinea, believed to be among the first group of humans to venture outside of Africa.
-Aborigine: Indigenous peoples of Australia and Tasmania6, pushed into the interior, or outback of Australia.
-Negrito: Loosely related Melanesian-like peoples of Southeast Asia who pre-date the Austronesians and others by thousands of years.
-Moluccan: Austronesian-speaking peoples of the Maluku and Timorese islands of Indonesia, of mixed Austronesian and Papuan origin.
-Melanesian: Austronesian-speaking peoples of the region of Melanesia in the Pacific.
-Micronesian: Austronesian-speaking peoples of the region of Micronesia in the Pacific, believed to have more Austronesian admixture than Melanesians.
-Polynesian: Austronesian-speaking peoples of the region of Polynesia in the Pacific, with the most Austronesian admixture of all Pacific islanders.

–Multiracial

-Mestizo: Descendants of colonial-era relations between Spaniards and the indigenous peoples of the Americas.
-Mulatto: Descendants of colonial-era relations between Spaniards and Africans7.
-Pardo: Descendants of colonial-era relations between the Portuguese, African and indigenous peoples of the America in Brazil.
-Zambo: Descendants of relations between escaped African slaves and the indigenous peoples of the Americas.
-Dougla: Descendants of relations between Afro-Caribbean and South Asian migrant workers8 mostly in Trinidad and Guyana.
-Malagasy: Descendants of ancient Austronesian sailors and Southeast Bantu peoples from modern-day Mozambique.
-African Creole: Creole Peoples of predominately European and African ancestry. Ex. Cape Coloured, Louisiana Creole, Cape Verdean
-Asian Creole: Creole Peoples of European and Asian ancestry. Ex. Anglo-Indian, Filipino Mestizo, Burgher
-Pacific Creole: Creole Peoples of European and Pacific Islander ancestry.

Ethnic Groups of the World

Civilizations of the World

Relative Sizes of the Countries of the World

This is the most intuitive map of the world for the purposes of country comparisons.

World Population Density

Estimated Human Population Worldwide	Year
200,000	c. 130,000 BCE
3 Million	c. 10,000 BCE
10 Million	c. 6,500 BCE
50 Million	c. 2,000 BCE
200 Million	c. 0 CE/BCE
1 Billion – Carrying Capacity	1804
2 Billion – Limit of Carrying Capacity	1927
3 Billion	1959
4 Billion	1974
5 Billion	1987
6 Billion	1999
7 Billion	2012
	2023
	2037
	2057

May 21, 2021