Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

@AtomDio@Rdanis@RadioFreeNorthwest Minimizes the age. The fascists were trying to create a nationalist rather than universalist version of communism in the french model. They saw the excesses of british empiricism and french despotism on one hand, and the excesses of jewish communism on the other. Worse, they understood that the emergence of a nationalist state would displace the jews from their creation of a parasitic financial state within a productive miltiary state. National socialism could never work and every economist knows this. What our people need is a political religion of ethnocentirsm that isn’t false with equally false promises. This is possible. But natsoc is never gonna sell and never gonna survive. It’s just something you can undrestand and so you seek to bring about what you understand rather than what you dont. The primary difference between the communist and fascist eras is that labor has lost all productive value. So neither strategy will work. The past doesn’t include economic solutoins given that the agrarian AND industrial eras are over. We need a new model for an economy. And as far as I can tell the only advantage we have is genetic and cultural and no one can repeat it. For that reason we want to separate. Not rule. If we rule we are eventually defeated – always. So we have to separate and self rule.