[C]ontext: My objective is to falsify if not quash and destroy the Anglo, German, and Jewish Enlightenments, as deceptive, erroneous, and catastrophic failures to generalize group evolutionary strategies, so that I may explain the next step in our political evolution: to replace monopoly government (majority rule) with the combination of strictly constructed, objectively moral, universal, rule of law, with a political market for the voluntary production of commons wherein we replace majority assent with minority dissent only possible by legal means. Hence I attack the anglo equalitarian, german rationalist, and jewish pseudoscientific systems of thought. While science has invalidated the anglo over the past two decades, and propertarian philosophy has allowed me to invalidated the german because of the 20th century advances in the philosophy of science, it has taken me longer to understand why the jewish means of propaganda (deception) is so effective at deceiving the pathological altruism of western europeans. This post is another in the series on the origins of jewish propagandism (loading, framing, overloading and suggesting suicidal actions.) [M]y interest in anarchism evaporated after a few months of living in Ukraine. Because Eastern Europe is where the Cosmopolitan authors got their ideas – from practicing it. A minority managing and preying upon society through privatization of commons produced by conqueror’s military action, but not paid for by the managers themselves. In other words, Cosmopolitan Anarchism is a dishonest attempt to restore the predation of private ownership prosecuted by the Jews against eastern Europe under the protection of external military conquerors (austrian, lithiania, poland, muscovy). In more accurate terms: Ashkenazi Colonialism. Wherein an administrative class is effectively hired to parasitically manage a conquered people and territory. We see this pattern in Iraq, where the same people have formed the administrative (bureaucratic) layer for the Bathist regime. We saw this in Russia where the same people formed the ideological and administrative layer for the Soviets – and the slaughter of the people. We see this in america where the same people have formed the propaganda layer (previously the priesthood) in academy and media for the imperial and colonial american state, and the combined neo-puritain, socialist, libertine, and neo-conservative agendas. In his book “The Fatal Embrace” author “Benjamin Ginsburg” argues that the jews must end their ongoing strategy of allying with the state as a means of oppressing the people, because in every case it results in their exclusion or extermination. —“Thus, over the past several centuries, Jews have played important roles in the construction of absolutist, liberal, and socialist states as well as major parts in movements seeking to reform or supplant regimes to which they were unable to obtain access. Jews have traditionally offered their services to the state in exchange for the regime’s guarantee of security and opportunity. Ironically, however, precisely this relationship between Jews and the state has often sparked organized anti-Semitic attacks.”— (See: http://www.amazon.com/Fatal-Embrace-Jews-State/dp/0226296652/) Anarchism is an ode to lost predation on the serfs of Eastern Europe just like James Bond is an ode to lost empire: they’re both fictions, and late twentieth century action movies are an ode to America’s lost moral high ground. “Voluntary-everything” is equivalent to Lawlessness. It is another great deception like Marxism and neoconservatism: a half truth preying upon the optimistic moral bias of western aristocratic egalitarians and their pathological altruism. Liberty, meaning the ability to do as you with without imposing costs upon others, is a product of the rule of law. And the only principle means of decidability for law that can possibly produce a condition of liberty is the prohibition on the imposition of costs, which we express as property rights, and the scope of those rights evolves in parallel to the evolution of the means of imposing costs that is the product of the expansion of technologies, methods of cooperation, and the division of labor. And we seek parasitism because it is much easier and more rewarding than production. So a few moral men rally to prohibit these parasitisms so that they and all can prosper. Those few men impose rule of law on an immoral population. These men constitute the western aristocracy. Rule of law. Nomocracy. The prohibition on the imposition of costs that result in free riding on the productivity of others. Aristocracy is the only source of liberty.
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
Human tribes are no more equal than breeds of dogs are equal. Sorry. Just how it
Human tribes are no more equal than breeds of dogs are equal. Sorry. Just how it is (ladies).
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-06 05:40:00 UTC
-
SCI FI? Its sitting in front of you. But as a writer it poses a problem: it’s a
SCI FI?
Its sitting in front of you. But as a writer it poses a problem: it’s a lot harder to create emotional drama in that future. We are back to material conflicts. None of this cheap chick-nonsense projected upon male characters who would never in a million years be concerned with such emotional trivialities.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-03 11:38:00 UTC
-
WHY? THE FUTURE ISN’T STAR TREK.. IT’S SOUTH AFRICA. THAT’S WHY
WHY? THE FUTURE ISN’T STAR TREK.. IT’S SOUTH AFRICA. THAT’S WHY.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-03 11:33:00 UTC
-
FIGHTING: Is this true? Watch videos on how white men fight. It’s interesting. W
FIGHTING: Is this true?
Watch videos on how white men fight. It’s interesting.
We evolved to fight in formation, using weapons. We are not impulsive. We have pacified much of our impulsive classes out of the gene pool. But we need weapons to fight with. We need to fight in groups. This is the secret to the evolution of western martial capability: technology plus cooperation.
Watch how fighting has changed due to the introduction of MMA. We pulled kicking from Asia, joints from Asia (low power techniques), wrestling from the west, and boxing from the west(high power techniques).
Watch how fighting has changed due to the popularization of fight videos.
Watch the emerging evidence that power makes over skill and endurance.
Fighting is evolving into little more than striking jaws with roundhouses. Meaning that white people need to carry weapons once again.
Africans have the most testosterone, are still impulsive, but they get such speed out of it, and they have amazing reach. It’s beautiful to watch them move. Africans are to fighting what white people are to ballet.
Africans don’t stop when you are down. And they seem to take much greater punishment before going down. More testosterone. They are less afraid of later retaliation?
Whites and asians do stop when you are down, and take less punishment. The purpose of our peoples is to stop the other. They are more afraid of later retaliation? (HBD Chick: is clannishness involved?)
Asians are definitely less sexually mature, that is the secret to their longevity. Africans more sexually mature. Human longevity will come from continuing humanity’s long process of extending sexual maturity. It wouldn’t hurt if we could find an appetite suppressant either.
This is not true of southeast asians, who are just a smaller, lighter, earlier version of man.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-28 04:52:00 UTC
-
As Far As I know, This Is The Definitive Analysis of the Church
[A]s far as I know: 1) The church served as a wealthy but weak professional administrative branch of government. 2) The church could grant moral authority to nobility and monarchy, or revoke it. Meaning that if revoked, your lands were marked for conquest by others. 3) The central tenet of christianity is the extension of kinship love to non-kin, breaking familial and tribal bonds. This is the only meaningful principle. It also happens to intuitively reflect hunter gatherer ethics and morality. 4) The church was able to legally enforce this policy by the prohibition on cousin marriage, and the grant of property rights to women. 5) While the church pursued these policies purely out of self interest: the removal of competition to the church as government, and the cheaper acquisition of lands, the net effect was to restore order to Celtica after the Roman destruction of Celtic Civilization and the impact of the migration period, and to provide sufficient administrative support that Saxon (north sea hanseatic) civilization could evolve into what we think of as Protestant Europe. There is nothing valuable at all in the literature. It is mere nonsense. The ‘good’ outcomes were the product of one principle ‘love’ and one institution: property rights under the common saxon law, administered by literate if ignorant clerks. Rome created a false history of european barbarism. The church, starting with Bede, has been successful in authoring a false history of Europe. Just as the “democratic era’ has authored a false history of Europe. Just as americans are being taught a false history of Europe. Economic history tells us differently. Aristocracy, sovereignty and Militita, Rule of Law, the common law of property, Extra-kinship love and high trust. These institutions produce the lowest transaction costs, and therefore highest possible economic velocity humans are capable of.
-
Explaining American Directness and Volume to Foreigners
—“The speaking volume in the United States for most conversations is very loud, which in many other countries would be considered rude. … Also, business people in the United States use very direct language and tight time management when communicating and running meetings, which people from many other countries might find off-putting.” –Raj Patel
ON VOLUME It’s counter-intuitive, but our volume is an expression of high trust: that if I can be said, it can be said in public, and with confidence or it should not be said. Or conversely, quiet people who speak in whispers may have other nasty habits. ORIGINS It is beneficial to remember that Anglo and Germanic civilizations only split in 1830, and that america was founded by pre-1830 anglos, and that the majority of white americans are at least of partial german decent. America is an english speaking germanic country. That is what separates English speaking America from english speaking Britain, Canada and Australia. (This insight is rather profound and you will find that it explains many american cultural peculiarities. America is a Tudor,German, Civilization with english institutions, law and language). We can also recall that the world now operates Military, Aircraft, and Seas in English (germanic english) using English commands and manners, because we found out that the rest of the world operates on face (lying), hierarchical(untrue), indirect(untrue), and permissive (untrue), language suitable for village life but not for running DANGEROUS environments where truth, clarity, and directness save lives. But the question is, why did germanic anglos invent this kind of direct language? BECAUSE WESTERNERS WERE ALL MEMBERS OF THE MILITIA. German evolved as an aristocratic, martial, language. And westerners have been practicing decentralized (militia) warfare for over 5000 years – at least since they invented the Chariot. So even today, the first thing you are taught in basic training is to speak clearly, loudly, confidently, and TESTIMONIALLY (truthfully), regardless of the social impact of your speech – because otherwise PEOPLE DIE. Americans and Germans retain (Germans more so) this military culture in daily life: speak directly, clearly and truthfully. Quiet speech means you are not to be trusted, and not a fully mature adult. Until the last few generations, we were taught GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC (public speaking) as a requirement. COMPARISON FOR HINDUS You are correct in stating that this directness eliminates cooperative economic friction, decreases the necessity of developing trust (it’s assumed) and increases the use of litigation when it fails. That is because america does not regulate what we do, it punishes what we do if we fail. (This is profound difference between the napoleonic ‘parental and permission” model of law. It is not obvious but while we have very similar genetic origins, and while we both have inherited the common law, that the reason India is so pervasively corrupt, is that it is not a high trust society that has succeeded in creating a universal militia independent of class, tribe and family biases. (and the decline in truth telling in favor of political correctness and postmodern argument in all walks of life is the reason for increasing corruption in america.) The west has been through a 5000 year meat grinder military service and the relative success of the west in all fields – science, commerce, and law – is because we tell the testimonial truth regardless of cost to anyone. Because as a martial people, doing so is your path to status and enfranchisement. And because in a martial people, the truth means people live in battle. And martial people were led by martial aristocracy. It has only been since the enfranchisement of women that these requirements for disciplined truth telling have been systematically undermined. And just as martial truth-telling (testimony) is the secret of the west’s evolutionary velocity compared to older civilizations, the secret of our downfall is the decline of this tradition of martial truth telling due to the inclusion of women in the electorate. (Look at the voting data. Look at today’s voting data. American white men vote red everywhere other than main and Seattle.) And that’s pretty scary really.
-
Explaining American Directness and Volume to Foreigners
—“The speaking volume in the United States for most conversations is very loud, which in many other countries would be considered rude. … Also, business people in the United States use very direct language and tight time management when communicating and running meetings, which people from many other countries might find off-putting.” –Raj Patel
ON VOLUME It’s counter-intuitive, but our volume is an expression of high trust: that if I can be said, it can be said in public, and with confidence or it should not be said. Or conversely, quiet people who speak in whispers may have other nasty habits. ORIGINS It is beneficial to remember that Anglo and Germanic civilizations only split in 1830, and that america was founded by pre-1830 anglos, and that the majority of white americans are at least of partial german decent. America is an english speaking germanic country. That is what separates English speaking America from english speaking Britain, Canada and Australia. (This insight is rather profound and you will find that it explains many american cultural peculiarities. America is a Tudor,German, Civilization with english institutions, law and language). We can also recall that the world now operates Military, Aircraft, and Seas in English (germanic english) using English commands and manners, because we found out that the rest of the world operates on face (lying), hierarchical(untrue), indirect(untrue), and permissive (untrue), language suitable for village life but not for running DANGEROUS environments where truth, clarity, and directness save lives. But the question is, why did germanic anglos invent this kind of direct language? BECAUSE WESTERNERS WERE ALL MEMBERS OF THE MILITIA. German evolved as an aristocratic, martial, language. And westerners have been practicing decentralized (militia) warfare for over 5000 years – at least since they invented the Chariot. So even today, the first thing you are taught in basic training is to speak clearly, loudly, confidently, and TESTIMONIALLY (truthfully), regardless of the social impact of your speech – because otherwise PEOPLE DIE. Americans and Germans retain (Germans more so) this military culture in daily life: speak directly, clearly and truthfully. Quiet speech means you are not to be trusted, and not a fully mature adult. Until the last few generations, we were taught GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC (public speaking) as a requirement. COMPARISON FOR HINDUS You are correct in stating that this directness eliminates cooperative economic friction, decreases the necessity of developing trust (it’s assumed) and increases the use of litigation when it fails. That is because america does not regulate what we do, it punishes what we do if we fail. (This is profound difference between the napoleonic ‘parental and permission” model of law. It is not obvious but while we have very similar genetic origins, and while we both have inherited the common law, that the reason India is so pervasively corrupt, is that it is not a high trust society that has succeeded in creating a universal militia independent of class, tribe and family biases. (and the decline in truth telling in favor of political correctness and postmodern argument in all walks of life is the reason for increasing corruption in america.) The west has been through a 5000 year meat grinder military service and the relative success of the west in all fields – science, commerce, and law – is because we tell the testimonial truth regardless of cost to anyone. Because as a martial people, doing so is your path to status and enfranchisement. And because in a martial people, the truth means people live in battle. And martial people were led by martial aristocracy. It has only been since the enfranchisement of women that these requirements for disciplined truth telling have been systematically undermined. And just as martial truth-telling (testimony) is the secret of the west’s evolutionary velocity compared to older civilizations, the secret of our downfall is the decline of this tradition of martial truth telling due to the inclusion of women in the electorate. (Look at the voting data. Look at today’s voting data. American white men vote red everywhere other than main and Seattle.) And that’s pretty scary really.
-
Untitled
http://intersectionproject.eu/article/society/russians-searching-new-motherland
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-26 04:26:00 UTC
-
EUROPEANS INBRED ESP. DURING THE MEDIEVAL MIGRATION PERIOD. Findings: 1) Admixtu
http://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdfExtended/S0960-9822(15)00949-5WESTERN EUROPEANS INBRED ESP. DURING THE MEDIEVAL MIGRATION PERIOD.
Findings:
1) Admixture within Europe tended to fall within the European Migration Period
2) West Eurasian genetic structure today is likely to have been maintained by admixture
–“recent admixture is ubiquitous across West Eurasia, with the majority of populations showing evidence of population mixing. Dating of these admixture events demonstrates that the Medieval Migration Period was a key period in establishing the current West Eurasian genetic landscape”–
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-25 13:38:00 UTC