THE OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF A PEOPLE
The purpose of life is not cooperation but persistence. Cooperation that is beneficial is rational. Cooperation that empowers enemies is not beneficial. There is no morality between enemies. It exists only between third parties who must decide to insure either party in conflict. And third parties can only determine morality, not by possession, but by which group produces higher trust, superior man.
It is very hard to argue that the world is better with any of the Arab states vs the Israeli. Otherwise one is forced into the logical argument that all people in all cultures, and all cultures in all nations, are equal, or of equal merit.
This is not the case. Morality exists between peers. Everything else requires merely objective analysis of the merits of the peoples. This conflicts with the ambitions of inferior peoples. The mongols did no good with their conquests – only evil. The russians only evil. The Chinese largely good.
So I do not support the postwar consensus any longer. It is a failed theory. The end is that if a people are a problem then they must be ruled by superiors who are not a problem, with the ambition of correcting them such that they develop into a productive people.
We are not equal. Some people, groups, tribes, nations are devolutionary and harmful. Of the modernizers I tend to see the church as the most benevolent, and the dutch and anglos next, and everyone else fairly distant third. This is probably unpleasant, but as far as I know it is hard to defeat.
Suppression of Parasitism is Pacification: Make the Universe a Garden For the God, Man.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-23 04:20:00 UTC