Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

THE JEWISH QUESTION IS REALLY OUR OWN QUESTION.

—Q&A: “Are Jews inherently different, morally?”—

a) It appears that the semites in general are not in fact the original levantine industrialists but pastoralists that were attracted there by the wealth of more advanced peoples. This is important in that the Jews never passed through the agrarian phase needed to both breed for and institutionalize a warrior caste sufficient to hold out against the martial, metalworking, and agrarian tribes. Nor did they develop sufficient territorial defenses of pastoralists during the ‘horse and wheel’ period to develop a martial class in that era. Jewish leadership has been limited to their bolshevik experience, and the recent Israeli experience. Their bible is, after all, an excuse with which to legitimize their inability to hold their kingdom despite having defeated some of their superior southern neighbors.

b) The religion promotes dual ethics, and is extremely immoral in practice. The Jews have a habit of allying with the state against the population. They have a habit of professionalizing parasitism by various means of fraud, and hazard creation.

c) Jews demonstrate steppe and desert, levantine and semitic, clannishness from the day of birth into maturity. Or perhaps more accurately, Ethnic Europeans do not, and Ethnic Jews do so.

d) It appears that Jews demonstrate a fairly constant lower sexual dimorphism, and/or some reversal of sexual dimorphism (the women more masculine, the men more feminine).

e) And so between selective breeding in the middle ages, and what appears a likely initial bias toward effeminacy. they lack our ‘rednecks’ who function as most groups ‘warrior ants’, but demonstrate that they inherit hyper-clannishness genetically not just culturally. (Scientifically they are one of the most racist peoples.)

d) Because of what I suspect are practical numerical, genetic, cultural, and feminine bias, culminating in verbal bias, they have been the primary creators of ‘the big lies’ – the most advanced “Gossip” systems ever created by man. (And this is something that is fascinating and worth study).

1) Scriptural Monotheism

2) Dual Ethics (separatist but cohabitating ethics)

3) Pseudoscience.

4) Propaganda (postmodernism)

5) High-externality Financialism (financial parasitism)

Their economic strategy (demonstrated in the USA again in this era) is Tunnel Spider Ethics. Bait with promise of discounts on reality, then draw resources parasitically through free riding, hazard, and fraud at scale.

POSITION

Once you understand it, And all the damage they have done, it will make you hate them for a few years. After you get passed it, you just learn how easy it is to defeat it.

And so my position on the Jewish question is that it is not the fault of a people for pursuing their group evolutionary strategy, it is the fault of others who have the capacity to defend against it and defeat it, but who do not defend against it, and defeat it. It is not the fault of europeans who conquered much of the world, but those who failed to advance as well as they did. It is not the fault of jews who were weak, but the fault of Europeans who were strong to defend against them.

We tamed violence, but we did not yet tame fraud.

It’s just time to tame fraud. In ALL its forms.

Truth is enough. Truth is enough to tame the great lies.

And that means we’re going to lose Supernaturalism, as well as Platonism, Pseudo-Rationalism, and Pseudo-Science. And that is the price of defending the people who invented Testimonial, Deflationary Truth from the great lies; and preserving for mankind that truthful culture: the culture that dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, and violence.

The suppression of crimes so that we may reap the benefit of their absence requires we bear costs of suppression of those crimes – and in our case the returns may be great, but the cost will include the abandonment of OUR OWN favored lies as well.

If you cannot speak truthfully and with warranty, you may not speak it in the commons. For the commons is not under your ownership. It is something we share. And we will not allow you to destroy the works of nature: land, water, air, or the works of man: life, capital, institutions, and information. And therefore we shall demand your warranty of information, just as we demand that of your services, products, and physical actions.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute