Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Why I don’t Condone Racism

    [W]HY I DON’T CONDONE RACISM 1) All groups can transcend the animal and evolve to fully human, and from fully human to our image of gods, if they merely suppress the rates of reproduction of their lower classes. 2) Classes (distributions) matter far more than race. Among elites in all races the primary differences across cultures appear to be verbal acuity – the ability to precisely articulate ideas. 3) As far as I can tell if people are fully integrated AND middle class or above (>105 IQ), and especially if they can obtain an empirical education (>110-115), they present no long term problem in small numbers because they try to obtain the benefits of membership in OUR society rather than attempt to obtain rents and political power on the behalf of their lower classes. 4) blaming others for our failings is simply an excuse not to act to change the status quo. the reason we are being invaded is the man in the mirror. States can only do what the warrior class (lower and middle class men) allow them to do.

    CAVEAT I recognize that I am an elite and that interact with the global elite and that as such my intuitionistic concern is different from that of our middle and lower classes. I know my bias is to be more ‘forgiving’. On the other hand if we build a worldwide alliance against corporatism and return to familialism, tribalism, and nationalism, it does not matter if we are different – it just provides us more opportunity to experiment. And moreover, with many small nations there is MORE ROOM AT THE TOP than there is in a ‘new world order’.

  • All Groups Are ‘Different’ Morally, Including Jews…. and Westerners

    —“Are Jews, (Gypsies, Arabs, Asians, Polynesians) inherently different, morally?”— [E]very group is different morally because every group modifies its strategy as needed in order to compete. Virtue is a competitive strategy, not necessarily an intrinsic good. a) Jews appear fairly constant in lower sexual dimorphism, and/or some reversal of sexual dimorphism (the women more masculine, the men more feminine) b) the religion promotes dual ethics, and is extremely immoral in practice. The jews have a habit of allying with the state against the population. They have a habit of professionalizing parasitism by various means of fraud, and hazard creation. (They have this because they cannot create a warrior caste necessary to hold territory.) And so between selective breeding in the middle ages, and what appears a likely initial bias toward effeminacy. they lack our ‘rednecks’ who function as most groups ‘warrior ants’.

    c) Because of what I suspect are verbal bias, and feminine bias, they have been the primary creators of ‘the big lies’. The most advanced “Gossip” systems ever created by man. (and this is something that is fascinating and worth study). 1) Scriptural Monotheism 2) Dual Ethics 3) Pseudoscience. 4) Propaganda (postmodernism) 5) High-externality Financialism (financial parasitism) Bait with promise of discounts on reality, then draw resources parasitically through free riding, hazard, and fraud at scale. Once you understand it, it will make you hate them for a few years. After you get passed it, you just learn how easy it is to defeat it. Truth is enough. We tamed violence, but we did not yet tame fraud. It’s just time to tame fraud. Blaming them for specializing in fraud is like blaming women for specializing in extracting resources from us, or others blaming us for specializing in war and innovation. Tame fraud: Testimonialism.

  • All Groups Are ‘Different’ Morally, Including Jews…. and Westerners

    —“Are Jews, (Gypsies, Arabs, Asians, Polynesians) inherently different, morally?”— [E]very group is different morally because every group modifies its strategy as needed in order to compete. Virtue is a competitive strategy, not necessarily an intrinsic good. a) Jews appear fairly constant in lower sexual dimorphism, and/or some reversal of sexual dimorphism (the women more masculine, the men more feminine) b) the religion promotes dual ethics, and is extremely immoral in practice. The jews have a habit of allying with the state against the population. They have a habit of professionalizing parasitism by various means of fraud, and hazard creation. (They have this because they cannot create a warrior caste necessary to hold territory.) And so between selective breeding in the middle ages, and what appears a likely initial bias toward effeminacy. they lack our ‘rednecks’ who function as most groups ‘warrior ants’.

    c) Because of what I suspect are verbal bias, and feminine bias, they have been the primary creators of ‘the big lies’. The most advanced “Gossip” systems ever created by man. (and this is something that is fascinating and worth study). 1) Scriptural Monotheism 2) Dual Ethics 3) Pseudoscience. 4) Propaganda (postmodernism) 5) High-externality Financialism (financial parasitism) Bait with promise of discounts on reality, then draw resources parasitically through free riding, hazard, and fraud at scale. Once you understand it, it will make you hate them for a few years. After you get passed it, you just learn how easy it is to defeat it. Truth is enough. We tamed violence, but we did not yet tame fraud. It’s just time to tame fraud. Blaming them for specializing in fraud is like blaming women for specializing in extracting resources from us, or others blaming us for specializing in war and innovation. Tame fraud: Testimonialism.

  • Dueling – The Seen and Unseen

    [L]ike many things I try to explain, the most important consequence of any action is the UNSEEN, not the seen. Duelling was pretty common, yes. But it’s not the duels that make the difference.

    Its the exceptionally rigorous public manners that make the difference. Dueling is a cost of creating civil society. So the question is not the cost of dueling. But **what is the cost of not dueling***

  • Dueling – The Seen and Unseen

    [L]ike many things I try to explain, the most important consequence of any action is the UNSEEN, not the seen. Duelling was pretty common, yes. But it’s not the duels that make the difference.

    Its the exceptionally rigorous public manners that make the difference. Dueling is a cost of creating civil society. So the question is not the cost of dueling. But **what is the cost of not dueling***

  • What is wrong with white group evolutionary strategy?

    What is wrong with white group evolutionary strategy?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 07:36:00 UTC

  • Yes The nazis tried to remove the undesirables from Europe. They transported the

    Yes

    The nazis tried to remove the undesirables from Europe.

    They transported these people to resettlement camps.

    The war failed. They ran out of resources.

    The resettlement camps turned into death camps.

    The Jews made a propaganda issue out of it, but so did the rest of the west – the west that germans had engaged in napoleonic conquest against.

    There is nothing more to know.

    I don’t get involved in jerk-off disputes. I think this is a jerk off dispute.

    Is that settled?

    Good.

    Don’t involve me in this nonsense.

    It’s beneath me.

    Love always.

    Thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 02:21:00 UTC

  • DUELING – THE SEEN AND THE UNSEEN Like many things I try to explain, the most im

    DUELING – THE SEEN AND THE UNSEEN

    Like many things I try to explain, the most important consequence of any action is the UNSEEN, not the seen.

    Duelling was pretty common, yes. But it’s not the duels that make the difference.

    Its the exceptionally rigorous public manners that make the difference.

    Dueling is a cost of creating civil society.

    So the question is not the cost of dueling.

    But **what is the cost of not dueling***

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 01:39:00 UTC

  • The ancient’s eugenetic practices are now mainstream

    The ancient’s eugenetic practices are now mainstream

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-05 10:12:00 UTC

  • Q&A: “Will you explain the difference between familialism, tribalism, nationalis

    —Q&A: “Will you explain the difference between familialism, tribalism, nationalism, and racism please?”—

    Racism: bitching about others, talking bout how bad they are.

    Nationalism: limiting your resource expenditures to kin.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-05 07:10:00 UTC