Western civilization evolved to assist in the reproduction of good FAMILIES and to constrain the reproduction of bad families. We have spent more than a century reversing that trend.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 16:53:00 UTC
Western civilization evolved to assist in the reproduction of good FAMILIES and to constrain the reproduction of bad families. We have spent more than a century reversing that trend.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 16:53:00 UTC
THE JQ AND THEIR TRANSFORMATION IN THE USA
Jews that immigrated to the USA from the borderland (Russian / eastern european) and from the various urban ghettos were absurdly superstitious unclean, people and considered barbarous and ignorant – lots of documentation. Their intellectual capital was (as is always under abrahamic ignorance) frozen. That is why despite being the most literate population they achieved nothing in all of history. WHat liberated their human capital was western rule of law and aristotelianism – just as it liberated western capital after the superstition of the church was overthrown with empiricism and the printing press. (just as conversely, the roman empire collapsed within 80 years of the forcible conversion of the polity to christianity in order to destroy the influence of the aristocracy – because the aristocracy performed civic religious rituals – not a specialized priesthood.)
The criticism of the jews at that time was correct. The mid century criticism of jewish immorality in business was correct. The current criticism of specializing in the ‘immoral’ trades (advertising, media, film, pornography, ‘lawyering’, financialism, propaganda, and academy) is also true. The question is whether that is their fault for specializing in immorality, or our fault for allowing them to immigrate and not legislating against the ability to exploit high trust populations by various forms of hazard creation – it’s not like they had not specialized in hazard creation in money lending, and rent seeking sectors throughout their history. They have always concentrated capital then used it against host populations. It is the most profitable industry ever invented by man after conquering and taxation. Deception and moral hazard free of warranty, are far more profitable industries that truth, warranty and productivity.
The fact that we let spread the industrialization of lying using propaganda to create moral hazard because it was advantageous in the sale of the conquered continent, and advantageous of the expansion of military power prior to the wars, and advantageous in the conquest of the european empires during their civil war, and advantages when we translated it into expansion of the working classes in the post war era to promote consumption, is just utilitarian. The problem is that we’re stuck with the consequences now until we are willing to suppress the abuse of public speech as we did prior to the first world war.
So you can blame subsaharan africans for a standard deviation lower intelligence, greater socialization needs, and more rapid and deeper sexual maturity, or you can blame white northeastern americans for defeating the south and killing half a million kinsmen instead of one of the options of buying the slaves back and paying to send them home to africa, or giving them their own agrarian territory so that they could form their own communities and take care of themselves; and never relocating them using the soviet method to white industrial centers and destroying their families and culture that had just taken root in the south. THe same for jews: if you import a group of people who have evolved over a few thousand years without going through the agrarian phase of self domestication, and instead who have specialized in financial and other forms of parasitism upon host communities, then whose fault is it that people behave ase they do? When you give women an the underclass the franchise without demanding evidence that they will not put it to misuse (parasitism) then whose fault is it? I mean, yo don’t beat a dog for being a dog. You train the owner so that he does not give opportunity to be revolting in the presence of civilized humans.
The fact that white europeans (according to Lynn – I’ve talked to him about it directly) have lost the same iq points as jews hold in advantage over whites at the moment, is due to the profiteering we have used under commercial capitalism to expand the reproduction of the lower and underclasses, and thereby reversed at least a thousand years of aggressively hanging every criminal possible, winter starvation, cold, plague, prevention from reproduction by domestic service, prevention of reproduction by manorialism by limiting access to land. Prevention of reproduction by late marriage under manorialism. And of course, war.
The single best method of improving the genetic, normative, social, economic, and political conditions of a people is to reduce the size of the underclass until there is sufficient labor shortage that there is demand for young and old in the labor pool.
While western civilization has always been eugenic, we have reversed it in the capitalist era – to our detriment, and to, apparently, the planet’s.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 16:24:00 UTC
AMERICANS LIVE ON THE BALLS AND BRAWN OF PRIOR GENERATIONS
—“Westerners struggle to define even the most basic forms of deception, let alone the sort of complexity that the Kremlin has been skull fucking you with for the past half-century. America, in particular, is living off the balls and brawn of prior generations while childishly and cowardly believing that appeasement, the NAP, negotiation with extortionists, and cooperation with terrorists (more so domestic than foreign) can end in anything other than a bloodbath.”—Emil Prelic
(priceless)
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 13:28:00 UTC
Fortress, Manor, or Church?
Germany, Britain, or France?
Sparta, Athens or Troy?
Rome, Venice, or Constantinople?
Alexander, Marco Polo, Mohammed?
Achilles, The Blacksmith, or Jesus?
Warrior, Producer, or Priest?
Law, Contract, Norm?
Truth, Exchange, or Fiction?
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 12:05:00 UTC
Russian versions of fairy tales are better.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 08:25:00 UTC
THE EVOLUTION OF RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS
1) Equalitarianism > Sovereignty > Law and truth
2) Slavery > Freedom > Abrahamism and deception
3) Taxation > Liberty > Philosophy and idealism
4) Democracy > Marxism/Libertarianism/Neoconservatism > Pseudo-science, pseudo-rationalism, pseudo-moralism.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 18:35:00 UTC
By Moritz Bierling
THE ISLAND FORTRESS OF ENGLAND, THE CULTURAL FORTRESS OF GERMANY
GERMAN DUTY
1. landed aristocracy surrounded by (potential) enemies
2. imperative: bind all existing resources on the territory (even sub optimally) to the overall socio-political unit to prevent its use by hostile actors
—> tends to discount material prosperity; put a premium on strong social cohesion as a defensive strategy against external threats
3. emphasis on duty of every individual to contribute to the group, its cohesion, and overall martial progress, with the state as an expansion of the nation’s will
4. Create maximal inter-operability between any individual and the group through strong cultural equation, cultivation of individual value in relation to the group, and strong hierarchies of authority
BRITISH LIBERTY
1. Landed aristocracy surrounded by a natural fortress (the sea)
2. Build up maximally productive individuals to retain independence from the larger Socio-political unit so as to preserve individual agency as defense against a corrupted (parasitical) government
—> tends to discount group agency; put a premium on distributed ability for revolt as defensive strategy against internal threats
3. Insistence on individual responsibility and self-sufficiency as well as the ability to separate from the state as necessary (desired), leaving open the option to confederate with others for exploitation of opportunities or in defense of existing capital against internal (and sometimes external) threats
4. Create maximal inter-operability between individual and the market through strong individual ability, cultivation of individual productivity, and fluid continuous formation of hierarchies for the exploitation of arising opportunities
The British benefited from a natural fortress and therefore have had a huge historical discount on defense allowing to engage in their fantasy of liberty without duty. They’ve been able to leave commons construction up to the individual aristocrats for that reason.
Bill Joslin
So the task at hand really boils down to a merging of Germanic and Anglo strategies.
Joel Davis
Bill the strategies have already been merged.. They call it “America”.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 04:22:00 UTC
ROUGH ESTIMATION OF IMMIGRATION MAXIMUMS
For a high trust population:
Total minority(non kin) population in single digits. No minority greater than three percent.
I’m trying to falsify it and I can’t.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:01:00 UTC
ENDING TRADITIONALIST AND LIBERTINE FALSEHOODS
(the middle class lies)
The source of western civilization is heroism > sovereignty > oath/jury/rule of law > markets in everything.
Upon the development of slavery (agriculture esp) the concept of freedom was developed. and freedom could be earned.
Upon the development of cities, we see a middle class seek the equivalent of sovergitny (liberty) and it evolves in the literature.
Upon the development of christian monarchies, we see the demand for liberty (preservation of local custom and rule).
Upon the rise of the middle classes we see the develoment of liberty (freedom from arbitrary rule)
Upon the rise of marxism we see the development of libertarianism (freedom from involuntary commons production)
This is “True” as far as I know, and does not allow for the conflation of terms.
What a person who is and excuse-maker does, is to try to preserve various frauds and conveniences rather than modify his arguments and language and speech to reflect the most truthful statements possible – thereby preventing further contamination of the informational commons
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 14:48:00 UTC
CLASS LANGUAGE ARISTOCRACY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM
(important)
By Bill Joslin
Isn’t this a matter of class perspective?
Aristrocrat – Heorism-Sovereinty-oath/jury/rule of law/markets in everything
Upper middle class – Duty-oath/granted lands(property)/protection of lands (property rights)/participation in markets (liberty)
Lower Classes – Obedience/protection/production/liberty by permission
Something like that?
Libertarians (current fashion) are lower classes demanding liberty on moral grounds, libertarians of old (Nobility) demand of liberty on religious grounds… both pleading while ignoring the source of liberty?
In other words only after agency has been developed downward into the middle class can liberty be distributed downward through the classes – The same responsibility/freedom (poor words) relation I spoke of last week.
West Civ cultivates agency across scale by creating and preserving conditions required for agency to develop (protection, insurance, restitution against impositions upon agency from other actors – property being the external manifestation and thus measure of agency).
Only by demonstrating the responsibility to handle liberty (obedience/oath to sovereigns to not impose upon the property of others -rule of law) allows liberty be extended.
In this context – left and libertarians, by denying the legitimacy or even presence of sovereignty in the equation demonstrate the inability to maintain responsible use of liberty. The result being a decay of agency across the whole (lies, inability to hold a territory, inconsistent – incoherent application of law etc)
(Curt Doolittle — my point exactly. you can’t get liberty until you have a middle class and you don’t get a middle class until well after western civ has developed. BUT OMG I SEE WHERE YOU ARE GOING WITH ACCOUNTING FOR AGENCY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 14:37:00 UTC