Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • THE ORIGINAL TEMPLES The very first, original temples, as far as I can tell, wer

    THE ORIGINAL TEMPLES

    The very first, original temples, as far as I can tell, were the equivalent of ‘roadside haunted houses’ (entertainment) that evolved into ‘safe houses’ for meetings between parties that might be in conflict. It turned out that ‘Safe Places’ were a highly desirable commodity. And vacation trips to the amusement park were just as popular in prehistory as they are today.

    Then priests came along and figured out how to make money at it.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 10:54:00 UTC

  • ORIGINS OF MAN AND WOMAN (sketch) ( … ) The Sun burned and the planets turned,

    ORIGINS OF MAN AND WOMAN

    (sketch)

    ( … )

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and ape knew to stand upright.

    And apes chased the beasts of the earth and killed them.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and ape knew cooperation.

    And man walked the earth.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew tools.

    And men knew murder.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew fire.

    And man knew war.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew speech.

    And man knew deceit.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew his woman and children.

    And man knew property.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew the husbandry of animals.

    And man knew wealth.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew the fruits of toiling the earth.

    And man knew slavery.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew crafts of making things.

    And men knew their differences.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew trade.

    And man knew villages, towns and cities.

    ( … )


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 10:18:00 UTC

  • AFRICA vs THE STEPPE vs THE WATERWAYS Africa seems to have been one crucible of

    AFRICA vs THE STEPPE vs THE WATERWAYS

    Africa seems to have been one crucible of evolution, and the steppe another, and the peoples of the waters another.

    I haven’t given that comparison much thought, but those three axis probably explain the differences between ‘the peoples along the waters”, the people of the steppe, and the people of africa.

    I mean, those three conditions put very different selection pressures on each group. and the difficulty of travel in africa vs water and steppe explains the diversity.

    If you can follow and hold the waters you will have it easier than the steppe. if you have the steppe you have it easier than you have in africa.

    And the deserts are something to be avoided at all costs.

    Africa would lead to deeper more rapid maturity, the steppe to greater aggression and opportunism, and the waters to domestication. And that is what we see.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 09:03:00 UTC

  • USA VS EUROPE I mean, is it that simple: We are Legal and Europe is Literary? Ye

    USA VS EUROPE

    I mean, is it that simple: We are Legal and Europe is Literary? Yep.

    USA: Commercial Legal Analytic Deflationary vs. EU: Religious Moral Literary Conflationary.

    And so Canada and UK are backsliders, AUS less so, and USA not so.

    Europe attacked the churches but evolved into them in the french model.

    USA continued the practice of deflation and separated public law from private religion, with the problem being that morals were not left to the regions and localities. Thereby leaving open the door for the restoration of religious rule that occured in europe to occur in the federal governent – which, for an ‘old europe of the americas’ to form required analytic government of commerce.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 12:50:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EUROPEANS AND AMERICANS Ok. Do I have this right, that ameri

    DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EUROPEANS AND AMERICANS

    Ok. Do I have this right, that americans practice the cults of protestantism and constitution, and so our ‘religiosity’ is overstated, while europeans, who practice the cults of secular democratic secular humanism, marxism and christianity are in fact more *superstitious* or *mystical* than americans? Because that is what I think divides the old world and the new world?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 12:47:00 UTC

  • Presumes all societies are not accumulative, whereas all societies demonstrate b

    Presumes all societies are not accumulative, whereas all societies demonstrate biases to accumulate. All that differs is what’s accumulated.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 05:17:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/894427341799247873

    Reply addressees: @jointstocksodom @comeonpeopleV_V

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/894380664996466688


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/894380664996466688

  • “Pythagoras was a mystic who took his cues from Egypt and Heraclitus was a dissa

    —“Pythagoras was a mystic who took his cues from Egypt and Heraclitus was a dissatisfied Aristocrat who worshiped fire, just like Zoroastrian priesthood. I guess we can consider them odd ducks in this development.”—Domagoj Vaci

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 14:11:00 UTC

  • ON RUSSIAN CURSES The word “Dolboeb” Russian(“долбаеб”) is a (very) rude curse w

    ON RUSSIAN CURSES

    The word “Dolboeb” Russian(“долбаеб”) is a (very) rude curse word for reckless “idiot” or “crazy idiot”. Russian curses are hard to translate because they are more poetic. But the closest is possibly ‘f-ckhead’ and ‘f-ckwit’.

    But, just as English curses include the intimation of irony, stupidity, incompetence, foolishness, and folly-pride, to understand the Russian versions, you have to add the sense of ‘drunkenness’ to the anglo conception of any insult: a sort of overconfidence, or certainty in your stupidity – plus something else… it’s … that Russians are strong people and curses very often imply someone is strong but stupid – so they don’t have the connotation many of our english words do of feebleness of one kind or another. They don’t think farce or folly, or childishness is funny – just stupid. Humor has to include this overconfidence and pride attribution in order for something to be funny.

    I mean, I remember an early morning, watching a drunk moron try to steal a piece of fruit from the back of a delivery truck, while they men working in the market and the various trucks just laughed and teased him, let him get away with it, then take it from him, and repeat this process for a good half an hour. I mean, there must have been thirty people watching this comedy and everyone was rolling with it. And all with an undercurrent of sympathy. We don’t do that kind of thing in protestant christianity. Which is unfortunate. It’s more civil.

    Russian culture isn’t so much legal as *reasonable*. There is more of the latin ‘reasonableness’, than the absolutism of protestant law. And I prefer our government but their civility.

    It’s why I love them so much.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 10:42:00 UTC

  • Urbanization has led to decivilization. A market is different from a plantation.

    Urbanization has led to decivilization.

    A market is different from a plantation.

    The cities were markets.

    Now they are plantations.

    They’re dysgenic ovary sinks.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-05 16:26:00 UTC

  • Daniel Gurpide Could you help me with the dates in the Rise/Collapse section bel

    Daniel Gurpide Could you help me with the dates in the Rise/Collapse section below? -thanks

    THE RULERS SPEAK IN LAW (limitations) – those who do.

    THE MERCHANTS SPEAK IN IDEALS (ambitions) – those who wish.

    THE SLAVES SPEAK IN RELIGION (resistance) – those who resist.

    LAW(MARKETS) : Rome: Real-Deflation (Everyone) SCIENCE / TRUTH

    WISDOM (FAMILIES): China: Real (Confucius) WISDOM LIT. / REASONABLE

    PHILOSOPHY: Athens: Ideal (Plato) PHILOSOPHY / REASON (RATIONALISM)

    THEOSOPHY: Phoenicia: Literary (Augustine) MYTH / ANALOGY (STORY)

    THEOLOGY: Babylon: Theology (Zoroaster) MYSTICISM / SUGGESTION

    MONOPOLY: Arabia: Unreal-Conflation (Abraham ) LIES / DECEPTION

    FOOLS talk about CONSPIRACIES

    SIMPLE people talk about PEOPLE, (No Collars – Tunics )

    COMMON people talk about EVENTS, (Blue Collars – Pants )

    EDUCATED people talk about IDEAS. (White Collars – Suits )

    WISE people talk about LAWS. (Black collars – Robes)

    THE RISE OF EUROPEAN ROME & COLLAPSE UNDER PERSIAN BYZANTIUM

    Roman Monarchy … 753 -> 510bc (243 yrs)

    Roman Republic ….. 510 -> 134 bc (376 yrs)

    Roman Empire……… 134bc -> 69 ad (

    Roman Federation .. 285 -> (East and west split)

    Roman Church Forms. 306 ->

    Roman Tolerance …. 313 (Edict of Milan)

    Forcible Conversion..380 (Edict of Thessalonica)

    Roman Fall …………… 476ad

    EVAN ANDREWS ON THE FALL OF ROMAN CIVILIZATION

    1) Invasions by Barbarian tribes

    The most straightforward theory for Western Rome’s collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire’s borders. The Romans weathered a Germanic uprising in the late fourth century, but in 410 the Visigoth King Alaric successfully sacked the city of Rome. The Empire spent the next several decades under constant threat before “the Eternal City” was raided again in 455, this time by the Vandals. Finally, in 476, the Germanic leader Odoacer staged a revolt and deposed the Emperor Romulus Augustulus. From then on, no Roman emperor would ever again rule from a post in Italy, leading many to cite 476 as the year the Western Empire suffered its deathblow.

    2) Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor

    Even as Rome was under attack from outside forces, it was also crumbling from within thanks to a severe financial crisis. Constant wars and overspending had significantly lightened imperial coffers, and oppressive taxation and inflation had widened the gap between rich and poor. In the hope of avoiding the taxman, many members of the wealthy classes had even fled to the countryside and set up independent fiefdoms. At the same time, the empire was rocked by a labor deficit. Rome’s economy depended on slaves to till its fields and work as craftsmen, and its military might had traditionally provided a fresh influx of conquered peoples to put to work. But when expansion ground to a halt in the second century, Rome’s supply of slaves and other war treasures began to dry up. A further blow came in the fifth century, when the Vandals claimed North Africa and began disrupting the empire’s trade by prowling the Mediterranean as pirates. With its economy faltering and its commercial and agricultural production in decline, the Empire began to lose its grip on Europe.

    3) The rise of the Eastern Empire

    The fate of Western Rome was partially sealed in the late third century, when the Emperor Diocletian divided the Empire into two halves—the Western Empire seated in the city of Milan, and the Eastern Empire in Byzantium, later known as Constantinople. The division made the empire more easily governable in the short term, but over time the two halves drifted apart. East and West failed to adequately work together to combat outside threats, and the two often squabbled over resources and military aid. As the gulf widened, the largely Greek-speaking Eastern Empire grew in wealth while the Latin-speaking West descended into economic crisis. Most importantly, the strength of the Eastern Empire served to divert Barbarian invasions to the West. Emperors like Constantine ensured that the city of Constantinople was fortified and well guarded, but Italy and the city of Rome—which only had symbolic value for many in the East—were left vulnerable. The Western political structure would finally disintegrate in the fifth century, but the Eastern Empire endured in some form for another thousand years before being overwhelmed by the Ottoman Empire in the 1400s.

    4) Overexpansion and military overspending

    At its height, the Roman Empire stretched from the Atlantic Ocean all the way to the Euphrates River in the Middle East, but its grandeur may have also been its downfall. With such a vast territory to govern, the empire faced an administrative and logistical nightmare. Even with their excellent road systems, the Romans were unable to communicate quickly or effectively enough to manage their holdings. Rome struggled to marshal enough troops and resources to defend its frontiers from local rebellions and outside attacks, and by the second century the Emperor Hadrian was forced to build his famous wall in Britain just to keep the enemy at bay. As more and more funds were funneled into the military upkeep of the empire, technological advancement slowed and Rome’s civil infrastructure fell into disrepair.

    5) Government corruption and political instability

    If Rome’s sheer size made it difficult to govern, ineffective and inconsistent leadership only served to magnify the problem. Being the Roman emperor had always been a particularly dangerous job, but during the tumultuous second and third centuries it nearly became a death sentence. Civil war thrust the empire into chaos, and more than 20 men took the throne in the span of only 75 years, usually after the murder of their predecessor. The Praetorian Guard—the emperor’s personal bodyguards—assassinated and installed new sovereigns at will, and once even auctioned the spot off to the highest bidder. The political rot also extended to the Roman Senate, which failed to temper the excesses of the emperors due to its own widespread corruption and incompetence. As the situation worsened, civic pride waned and many Roman citizens lost trust in their leadership.

    6) The arrival of the Huns and the migration of the Barbarian tribes

    The Barbarian attacks on Rome partially stemmed from a mass migration caused by the Huns’ invasion of Europe in the late fourth century. When these Eurasian warriors rampaged through northern Europe, they drove many Germanic tribes to the borders of the Roman Empire. The Romans grudgingly allowed members of the Visigoth tribe to cross south of the Danube and into the safety of Roman territory, but they treated them with extreme cruelty. According to the historian Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman officials even forced the starving Goths to trade their children into slavery in exchange for dog meat. In brutalizing the Goths, the Romans created a dangerous enemy within their own borders. When the oppression became too much to bear, the Goths rose up in revolt and eventually routed a Roman army and killed the Eastern Emperor Valens during the Battle of Adrianople in A.D. 378. The shocked Romans negotiated a flimsy peace with the barbarians, but the truce unraveled in 410, when the Goth King Alaric moved west and sacked Rome. With the Western Empire weakened, Germanic tribes like the Vandals and the Saxons were able to surge across its borders and occupy Britain, Spain and North Africa.

    7) Christianity and the loss of traditional values

    The decline of Rome dovetailed with the spread of Christianity, and some have argued that the rise of a new faith helped contribute to the empire’s fall. The Edict of Milan legalized Christianity in 313, and it later became the state religion in 380. These decrees ended centuries of persecution, but they may have also eroded the traditional Roman values system. Christianity displaced the polytheistic Roman religion, which viewed the emperor as having a divine status, and also shifted focus away from the glory of the state and onto a sole deity. Meanwhile, popes and other church leaders took an increased role in political affairs, further complicating governance. The 18th-century historian Edward Gibbon was the most famous proponent of this theory, but his take has since been widely criticized. While the spread of Christianity may have played a small role in curbing Roman civic virtue, most scholars now argue that its influence paled in comparison to military, economic and administrative factors.

    8) Weakening of the Roman legions

    For most of its history, Rome’s military was the envy of the ancient world. But during the decline, the makeup of the once mighty legions began to change. Unable to recruit enough soldiers from the Roman citizenry, emperors like Diocletian and Constantine began hiring foreign mercenaries to prop up their armies. The ranks of the legions eventually swelled with Germanic Goths and other barbarians, so much so that Romans began using the Latin word “barbarus” in place of “soldier.” While these Germanic soldiers of fortune proved to be fierce warriors, they also had little or no loyalty to the empire, and their power-hungry officers often turned against their Roman employers. In fact, many of the barbarians who sacked the city of Rome and brought down the Western Empire had earned their military stripes while serving in the Roman legions.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 15:29:00 UTC