Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Alexander Zavialov Aside from looking morphologically different, all we know is

    Alexander Zavialov Aside from looking morphologically different, all we know is that he lacked the light skin colour-associated alleles in modern Europeans and that his skin colour-associated DNA accounted for 40% of the variation between Europeans and Africans. In other words, he was at least half as dark as depicted. Darker than modern Europeans but lighter than Indians. Any time. Keep in mind that your average North European is almost 60% Cheddar Man (WHG), so these deluded fantasies of low IQ journalists aren’t even remotely true. Unfortunately, some people on the right have taken this opportunity to badmouth and cast doubt on the scientific research that the faulty reconstruction was based on. There was nothing wrong with the research, only the politically motivated reconstruction and the journalist swine who propogated it.
  • Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales becau

    Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales because western fairy tales teach honor, skepticism, and to be on the lookout for treachery. They do not celebrate infantilism. They warn us against it.

    Go to a children’s bookstore in Russia and Ukraine and you’ll find the books children used to read in germanic speaking countries.

    Kings, Princes, Princesses, Heroes, and Maids.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-18 09:58:00 UTC

  • Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales becau

    Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales because western fairy tales teach honor, skepticism, and to be on the lookout for treachery. They do not celebrate infantilism. They warn us against it. Go to a children’s bookstore in Russia and Ukraine and you’ll find the books children used to read in germanic speaking countries. Kings, Princes, Princesses, Heroes, and Maids.
  • Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales becau

    Don’t be ridiculous. (((Dr. Seuss))) wrote communist-socialist fairy tales because western fairy tales teach honor, skepticism, and to be on the lookout for treachery. They do not celebrate infantilism. They warn us against it. Go to a children’s bookstore in Russia and Ukraine and you’ll find the books children used to read in germanic speaking countries. Kings, Princes, Princesses, Heroes, and Maids.
  • If you want me to analyze any people’s history I can find good in those who held

    If you want me to analyze any people’s history I can find good in those who held kinship territory, and not find good in those who didn’t. It’s really that simple.

    If your kin are not disciplined enough to hold territory they will not be disciplined enough to create competitieve commons.

    If they cannot create competitive commons there will be nothing to examine – no record of their existence – to comment upon.

    Commons create intergeneral capital. Kin groups (genes) create intergenerational capital. And to some degree you must trade off one against the other.

    Of course as always, the more eugenic your people the better their history.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-18 07:22:00 UTC

  • If you want me to analyze any people’s history I can find good in those who held

    If you want me to analyze any people’s history I can find good in those who held kinship territory, and not find good in those who didn’t. It’s really that simple. If your kin are not disciplined enough to hold territory they will not be disciplined enough to create competitieve commons. If they cannot create competitive commons there will be nothing to examine – no record of their existence – to comment upon. Commons create intergeneral capital. Kin groups (genes) create intergenerational capital. And to some degree you must trade off one against the other. Of course as always, the more eugenic your people the better their history.
  • If you want me to analyze any people’s history I can find good in those who held

    If you want me to analyze any people’s history I can find good in those who held kinship territory, and not find good in those who didn’t. It’s really that simple. If your kin are not disciplined enough to hold territory they will not be disciplined enough to create competitieve commons. If they cannot create competitive commons there will be nothing to examine – no record of their existence – to comment upon. Commons create intergeneral capital. Kin groups (genes) create intergenerational capital. And to some degree you must trade off one against the other. Of course as always, the more eugenic your people the better their history.
  • “Curt Doolittle thoughts on the Dutch?”— They started with a post-pastoralist,

    —“Curt Doolittle thoughts on the Dutch?”—

    They started with a post-pastoralist, migration period ,north sea gene pool untouched by urbanization (urbanization is dysgenic due to lower cost of opportunities. Cities are a trade-off).

    They started the organized application of manorialism first, and were at it the longest (commons). (And in some sense northern europeans seem to have practiced some variation on manorialism at least back to the corded ware era.)

    They built necessary and survival-dependent commons early (technology and commons).

    They built a dominant trading state with a tiny population and small territory using a navy (technology and commons )

    They produced some of the finest arts in the late medieval and early modern world (technological innovation in the arts).

    They avoided the problems of immigration despite their tolerance and trade. (Heavy normative demands)

    And as far as I know they were (until immigration) the best gene pool on earth for having done so. (see height and skull size)

    They have taken the pathetic disease of postwar virtue signaling to extremes and committed suicide.

    (I would live there but I’d be in jail for violating the speed limit so often. I build up hundreds of dollars of tickets every time I go there. lol)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-18 07:18:00 UTC

  • “Curt Doolittle thoughts on the Dutch?”— They started with a post-pastoralist,

    —“Curt Doolittle thoughts on the Dutch?”— They started with a post-pastoralist, migration period ,north sea gene pool untouched by urbanization (urbanization is dysgenic due to lower cost of opportunities. Cities are a trade-off). They started the organized application of manorialism first, and were at it the longest (commons). (And in some sense northern europeans seem to have practiced some variation on manorialism at least back to the corded ware era.) They built necessary and survival-dependent commons early (technology and commons). They built a dominant trading state with a tiny population and small territory using a navy (technology and commons ) They produced some of the finest arts in the late medieval and early modern world (technological innovation in the arts). They avoided the problems of immigration despite their tolerance and trade. (Heavy normative demands) And as far as I know they were (until immigration) the best gene pool on earth for having done so. (see height and skull size) They have taken the pathetic disease of postwar virtue signaling to extremes and committed suicide. (I would live there but I’d be in jail for violating the speed limit so often. I build up hundreds of dollars of tickets every time I go there. lol)
  • “Curt Doolittle thoughts on the Dutch?”— They started with a post-pastoralist,

    —“Curt Doolittle thoughts on the Dutch?”— They started with a post-pastoralist, migration period ,north sea gene pool untouched by urbanization (urbanization is dysgenic due to lower cost of opportunities. Cities are a trade-off). They started the organized application of manorialism first, and were at it the longest (commons). (And in some sense northern europeans seem to have practiced some variation on manorialism at least back to the corded ware era.) They built necessary and survival-dependent commons early (technology and commons). They built a dominant trading state with a tiny population and small territory using a navy (technology and commons ) They produced some of the finest arts in the late medieval and early modern world (technological innovation in the arts). They avoided the problems of immigration despite their tolerance and trade. (Heavy normative demands) And as far as I know they were (until immigration) the best gene pool on earth for having done so. (see height and skull size) They have taken the pathetic disease of postwar virtue signaling to extremes and committed suicide. (I would live there but I’d be in jail for violating the speed limit so often. I build up hundreds of dollars of tickets every time I go there. lol)