Curt Doolittle

Category: Business, Organization, and Management

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51636369_10156958384132264_587175145

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51636369_10156958384132264_587175145

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51636369_10156958384132264_5871751452237496320_o_10156958384122264.jpg DISCORD IS HOOKED UP TO THE INSTITUTE

    (admins pomen and propertarian joe)Connor WhittlawThe benefits of having a programmer as a philosopherFeb 2, 2019, 1:33 PMEdward John WyattCould I get an invite Curt?Feb 2, 2019, 1:35 PMVengefül BobmoranThe button “Open Discord” appears to give invites. (I didn’t complete the process however, so not fully tested.)Feb 2, 2019, 1:39 PMGeorge Perceval OswaldLooking goodFeb 2, 2019, 1:46 PMCurt DoolittleIt will give invites automatically.Feb 2, 2019, 1:46 PMCurt DoolittleIf you’re stupid enough to cross the line, you deserve what you get. You’re just doing Darwin’s work on the rest of our behalf.Feb 2, 2019, 4:25 PMEmily WalshTRS guys are pretty sure Discord helped dox a bunch of our people.

    Treat carefullyFeb 3, 2019, 9:28 PMEmily WalshSpencer Young Thanks for the link! I had trouble finding any documentation.Feb 3, 2019, 10:52 PMDISCORD IS HOOKED UP TO THE INSTITUTE

    (admins pomen and propertarian joe)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-02 13:32:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTANDING OF USE VS CONSTRUCTION The general public need only understand pol

    UNDERSTANDING OF USE VS CONSTRUCTION

    The general public need only understand policy and benefits.

    —“That attitude tells me all I need know about your organization.”—Mark Wright

    What??? The general public needs to understand How to write strictly constructed law? And deflation, disambiguation and serialization, operational semantics and grammar, transactionally expanded sentences, dimensions of testing available to the human mind, the means of warrantying due diligence in both in and across those dimensions? falsificationism vs justificationism? The difference between ontological, axiomatic, and theoretic systems? Why does the public need to understand that? They can’t.

    The general public doesn’t study formal logic, advanced mathematics, political, institutional, financial or micro economics, the law, engineering, physics, or cognitive science. they use the products of those who do.

    “For sovereignty, liberty and freedom to exist, the Law must consist of very simple rules.” And there is only one sentence the public needs to understand: *”Natural Law, the rights of anglo saxons, the Adams-Jefferson constitution, and western civilization’s success in the ancient, modern, and future worlds, depended and depends upon the continuous production of velocity by the continuous production of agency by the continuous use of sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, law and jury, and markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and group strategy, at the cost of minimizing the rates of reproduction of those unable to contribute to those demands.”*

    They need to understand we can de financialize, de politicize, restore truthful speech in commerce, finance, economics, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy; restore the civic society and . They need to understand the rights and obligations in the policies that produce those ends. To follow a simple law does not require that men understand its underlying science. If so it would be useless. We must not understand how to build any given set of tools, only once built, how to use them within our sphere of agency.

    Do not assume I am a fool.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-02 10:18:00 UTC

  • User Register

    [wp_event_register]

  • For the courses we need: The Intellectual (academic – argument ) The Martial (mi

    For the courses we need:

    The Intellectual (academic – argument )

    The Martial (military – force)

    The Spiritual (social – mindfulness)

    The Physical. (personal – fitness)

    The only hard ones are the physical because it is very hard to ‘authenticate’ talent that isn’t already part of our ‘fitness’ circle on one hand an our ‘combat sports’ circle on the other.

    it’s just an IQ thing, I know. But it’s harder to find that than you think.

    Anyway, we will start with Art, History, Law, and War and build out from there.

    Very excited.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 23:17:00 UTC

  • COURSES UPDATE Application for Courses should be working …. ~should be~ now. I

    COURSES UPDATE

    Application for Courses should be working …. ~should be~ now. If you are interested, then please consider registering, applying, and in doing so, helping us test the software.

    🙂 Curt.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 16:22:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089921666145312768

  • BUT WHAT ABOUT NEPOTISM???? —“If you have the time can anyone explain to me ho

    BUT WHAT ABOUT NEPOTISM????

    —“If you have the time can anyone explain to me how you deal/curtail with nepotism in your hierarchy ? A link to read perhaps? Worthy men aren’t always from the same family e.g. the son is not always the father by far. I’m curious.”–David England

    What ended nepotism in european peoples?

    In what industries did nepotism persist until today?

    Why did those instances of nepotism persist and why did the other instances not persist?

    What could be done to end the kind of nepotism that survives?

    What kind of nepotism can (should) continue to survive? (why is nepotism always a bad thing, or why is it indicative of a bad thing since it is hard to make the case that nepotism is a universal bad?)

    The answer will be obvious once you work thru it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 12:04:00 UTC

  • COURSES UPDATE Application for Courses should be working …. ~should be~ … no

    COURSES UPDATE

    Application for Courses should be working …. ~should be~ … now. If you are interested, then please consider registering, applying, and in doing so, helping us test the software.

    http://propertarianism.com/

    🙂 Curt.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 11:22:00 UTC

  • TO OUR PATRONS We don’t really try to push donations but they do matter. Every l

    http://patreon.com/propertarianismTHANKS TO OUR PATRONS

    We don’t really try to push donations but they do matter.

    Every little bit helps cover our expenses.

    Thanks to all of you who keep the doors open.

    Hugs all. 😉

    https://www.patreon.com/propertarianism

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 11:12:00 UTC

  • INTERESTING FEEDBACK FROM SOMEONE’S APPLICATION (a) professionals are taking not

    INTERESTING FEEDBACK FROM SOMEONE’S APPLICATION

    (a) professionals are taking note, and understand.

    (b) john mark is really killing it with his messaging.

    —“5- Prior to John Marks videos, my first impression of Propertarianism was merely the extension of current law concerning property into other areas of tort law – where my head is now… property is not being “extended” it is being re-defined to anything we build or feel the need to defend.

    It is an ethical system which has as a first priority honesty, as high truth environments are the most fertile for trade due to their decrease of friction.

    Friction is avoided if trades meet the fair trade criteria, this is derived from Natural Law and is called Reciprocity. Assumption is if Reciprocity is met, conflict will be avoided. If any or all aspects of reciprocity are violated violence could ins-sue, and likely would with repeat offenses.

    The system would allow state violence, to enforce the rules of trade, through the courts devised for the particular legal systems for that domain (seems to be that we would need specialists here – less politicians but a lot more lawyers/judges?).

    Science is our best model for truth telling so we extend that discipline into all domains, and create definitions and a judiciary that can properly administer justice according to the rules of trade in that domain. This leads to a new paradigm of how any defined group can trade in any operational domain.

    One key notion of the theory I see you have in place is correspondence: the definitions, rules, goals have to be able to be demonstrable, operationalized. This seems is key. I am still working it… just been a few days…”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 10:59:00 UTC

  • Yes, but courses > book > conference. (I’m kind of buried… lol)

    Yes, but courses > book > conference. (I’m kind of buried… lol)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-27 14:34:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089532079090601985

    Reply addressees: @Jake38109894 @mediocrecroat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089515670621093888

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089515670621093888