Curt Doolittle

Category: Business, Organization, and Management

  • What I Do Here: An Experimental Classroom (King of the Hill, and No Hate)

    (regular repost) ===AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM=== [F]or new friends and followers, please understand what I do here and on FB. It is my sketch pad. I work in public like a village blacksmith where you can peer into the forge and see the experimental work being done – good and bad. Propertarianism is a very special thing and you can learn a lot about the world by following me. But it does require that you keep in mind that I am constantly using the community as an experimental pool to test ideas and seek criticism. I am slaying a few hundred years of sacred western ideas, and doing so mercilessly. This often requires that I experiment in everything from very rigorous philosophy, to the most general of aphorisms and narratives. Some of which are guaranteed to offend you. (And me sometimes, too.) But my goal is to capture what made the west competitively successful in our history in formal logical and scientific terms – for the first time, to capture it as an analytic political philosophy, recommend formal institutions, espouse it as an ideology, and provide moral authority for revolution, the strategic and tactical means of conducting that revolution. I am not so much a populist as an engineer. Its not my job to be popular. It’s my job to discover the truth. === KING OF THE HILL GAME: TEACHING MEN === I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. I’ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early. Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if it’s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument. I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them. My role in this game is to play king of the hill, and say “come get me“. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development). That is why this game works. Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating. The internet does change. Men don’t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases. The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience. I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.) You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview – because I’m not very much like my online persona. This is educational entertainment and theatre. === I DON’T DO HATE === Um. I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy. But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism predation, and fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty. I advocate nationalism, tribalism, sovereignty and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence. I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement. I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement. I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man.

  • Blocking Policy

    [I] hate blocking people and my block list was very short until peers and followers asked me to stop wasting my time; to clean up the feed; and to preserve the educational environment. I teach the Law and its application. I run a class 24×7 to a global audience. My goal is to preserve the environment. I (WE) BLOCK FOR: 1 – Wasting my (our) time. Which consists of: 2 – Ridicule, Sarcasm, Gossiping, Rallying Shaming, Moralizing (GSRM) as a substitute for argument. 3 – Memes as a substitute for argument. (no meme zone) 4 – Intellectual Dishonesty in argument 5 – Antagonism as a substitute for argument. 6 – Faith or Sophism as a substitute for argument. 7 – Occasionally: Argument from Ignorance and Arrogance (attacking the work while not knowing enough to do so.) 8 – Occasionally also: Common Stupidity, Schizotypal stupidity (paranoia), Other Psychological Problems. I (WE) DO NOT BLOCK FOR – Good natured teasing. I am easy to tease. Height, age, generation, weight, aspieness, number of women/divorces, tech stuff, abundance of typing mistakes, being a 1%er, teaching by king of the hill game, the difference between my real and online personalities. You know, the list is endless. NOTE: I (we) practice reciprocity. So if you use GSRM against me (us) , I(we) will use it against you … and then return to the central point – over, and over, and over again.

  • What I Do Here: An Experimental Classroom (King of the Hill, and No Hate)

    (regular repost) ===AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM=== [F]or new friends and followers, please understand what I do here and on FB. It is my sketch pad. I work in public like a village blacksmith where you can peer into the forge and see the experimental work being done – good and bad. Propertarianism is a very special thing and you can learn a lot about the world by following me. But it does require that you keep in mind that I am constantly using the community as an experimental pool to test ideas and seek criticism. I am slaying a few hundred years of sacred western ideas, and doing so mercilessly. This often requires that I experiment in everything from very rigorous philosophy, to the most general of aphorisms and narratives. Some of which are guaranteed to offend you. (And me sometimes, too.) But my goal is to capture what made the west competitively successful in our history in formal logical and scientific terms – for the first time, to capture it as an analytic political philosophy, recommend formal institutions, espouse it as an ideology, and provide moral authority for revolution, the strategic and tactical means of conducting that revolution. I am not so much a populist as an engineer. Its not my job to be popular. It’s my job to discover the truth. === KING OF THE HILL GAME: TEACHING MEN === I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. I’ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early. Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if it’s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument. I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them. My role in this game is to play king of the hill, and say “come get me“. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development). That is why this game works. Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating. The internet does change. Men don’t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases. The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience. I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.) You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview – because I’m not very much like my online persona. This is educational entertainment and theatre. === I DON’T DO HATE === Um. I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy. But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism predation, and fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty. I advocate nationalism, tribalism, sovereignty and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence. I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement. I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement. I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man.

  • Blocking Policy

    [I] hate blocking people and my block list was very short until peers and followers asked me to stop wasting my time; to clean up the feed; and to preserve the educational environment. I teach the Law and its application. I run a class 24×7 to a global audience. My goal is to preserve the environment. I (WE) BLOCK FOR: 1 – Wasting my (our) time. Which consists of: 2 – Ridicule, Sarcasm, Gossiping, Rallying Shaming, Moralizing (GSRM) as a substitute for argument. 3 – Memes as a substitute for argument. (no meme zone) 4 – Intellectual Dishonesty in argument 5 – Antagonism as a substitute for argument. 6 – Faith or Sophism as a substitute for argument. 7 – Occasionally: Argument from Ignorance and Arrogance (attacking the work while not knowing enough to do so.) 8 – Occasionally also: Common Stupidity, Schizotypal stupidity (paranoia), Other Psychological Problems. I (WE) DO NOT BLOCK FOR – Good natured teasing. I am easy to tease. Height, age, generation, weight, aspieness, number of women/divorces, tech stuff, abundance of typing mistakes, being a 1%er, teaching by king of the hill game, the difference between my real and online personalities. You know, the list is endless. NOTE: I (we) practice reciprocity. So if you use GSRM against me (us) , I(we) will use it against you … and then return to the central point – over, and over, and over again.

  • POLICY: WHAT I DO HERE (regular repost) ===AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM=== For new

    POLICY: WHAT I DO HERE

    (regular repost)

    ===AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM===

    For new friends and followers, please understand what I do here and on FB. It is my sketch pad. I work in public like a village blacksmith where you can peer into the forge and see the experimental work being done – good and bad.

    Propertarianism is a very special thing and you can learn a lot about the world by following me. But it does require that you keep in mind that I am constantly using the community as an experimental pool to test ideas and seek criticism.

    I am slaying a few hundred years of sacred western ideas, and doing so mercilessly. This often requires that I experiment in everything from very rigorous philosophy, to the most general of aphorisms and narratives. Some of which are guaranteed to offend you. (And me sometimes, too.)

    But my goal is to capture what made the west competitively successful in our history in formal logical and scientific terms – for the first time, to capture it as an analytic political philosophy, recommend formal institutions, espouse it as an ideology, and provide moral authority for revolution, the strategic and tactical means of conducting that revolution.

    I am not so much a populist as an engineer. Its not my job to be popular. It’s my job to discover the truth.

    === KING OF THE HILL GAME: TEACHING MEN ===

    I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. I’ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early.

    Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if it’s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument.

    I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them.

    My role in this ‘game’ is to play king of the hill, and say ‘come get me’. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development). That is why this game works.

    Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating.

    The internet does change. Men don’t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases.

    The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience.

    I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.)

    You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview – because I’m not very much like my online persona.

    This is educational entertainment and theatre.

    === I DON’T DO HATE ===

    Um. I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy.

    But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism predation, and fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty.

    I advocate nationalism, tribalism, sovereignty and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence.

    I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement.

    I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement.

    I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-06 12:33:00 UTC

  • POSTING POLICY: THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS (repost) 1 =========ARGUM

    POSTING POLICY: THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS

    (repost)

    1 =========ARGUMENTS===============

    THIS MEANS I WROTE IT FOR YOU TO READ AS AN ARGUMENT OR STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION

    (this is a tag that cues you to important stuff)

    And this is the body text here.

    ––“this is quoting someone else”––

    —this is quoting myself—

    … this

    … … is a

    … … … series that you might want to learn.

    |series| another series > you might > want to > learn.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine <– Signature means I want to save it.

    2 =========NOTES TO SELF========

    this doesn’t have header so it’s just a record from elsewhere or quick thought or observation, or a work in progress. a sketchpad.

    3 ====OPINIONS OR OBSERVATIONS===

    (this doesn’t have a header, is in parenthesis and in all lower case, which means it’s possibly something to ignore … because it’s not an argument, but an opinion, or comment, or thought. )

    4 =========DIARY ENTRIES=========

    (diary entry)

    this is something I wrote for myself that is unfiltered, and likely includes very personal feelings of my own, or on the state of my thinking, and not something that you will probably want to read unless the psychology that I operate under is of some interest to you or other.

    ===========================

    Closing:

    I work in public, partly to conduct experiments. I am personally open in public because this prevents people attributing psychological motivations to me that I don’t have. I create conflict in order to run tests. The purpose of running a test is to attempt to create a proof of possibility.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-06 12:25:00 UTC

  • BLOCKING POLICY I hate blocking people and my block list was very short until pe

    BLOCKING POLICY

    I hate blocking people and my block list was very short until peers and followers asked me to stop wasting my time; to clean up the feed; and to preserve the educational environment.

    I teach the Law and its application. I run a class 24×7 to a global audience. My goal is to preserve the environment.

    I (WE) BLOCK FOR:

    1 – Wasting my (our) time. Which consists of:

    2 – Ridicule, Sarcasm, Gossiping, Rallying Shaming, Moralizing (GSRM) as a substitute for argument.

    3 – Memes as a substitute for argument. (no meme zone)

    4 – Intellectual Dishonesty in argument

    5 – Antagonism as a substitute for argument.

    6 – Faith or Sophism as a substitute for argument.

    7 – Occasionally: Argument from Ignorance and Arrogance (attacking the work while not knowing enough to do so.)

    8 – Occasionally also: Common Stupidity, Schizotypal stupidity (paranoia), Other Psychological Problems.

    I (WE) DO NOT BLOCK FOR

    – Good natured teasing. I am easy to tease. Height, age, generation, weight, aspieness, number of women/divorces, tech stuff, abundance of typing mistakes, being a 1%er, teaching by king of the hill game, the difference between my real and online personalities. You know, the list is endless.

    NOTE:

    I (we) practice reciprocity. So if you use GSRM against me (us) , I(we) will use it against you … and then return to the central point – over, and over, and over again.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-06 12:03:00 UTC

  • MARTIN IS UPDATING THE LIBRARY AND HAS QUESTIONS by ‎Martin Štěpán‎ I’ll be maki

    MARTIN IS UPDATING THE LIBRARY AND HAS QUESTIONS

    by ‎Martin Štěpán‎

    I’ll be making a new propertarian library.

    The goal is to complete the reading list as much as possible

    But also to add a lot more that isn’t on the list.

    Q1: ORGANIZATION: Would you prefer it organized based on the reading list just like the current library or by the author?

    Q2: AUDIOBOOKS: Would there be a demand for audiobooks?

    Q3: OTHER SUGGESTIONS: Any other suggestions are welcome.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 14:54:00 UTC

  • 1) I’ve founded one of the largestly held private consulting companies, been a p

    1) I’ve founded one of the largestly held private consulting companies, been a principle in another of similar size, and founded a third, all of which still exist today in some form or other. Average people can learn the syntax, just like they can learn basic mathematics.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 14:21:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092790272625393664

    Reply addressees: @webdevMason @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888

    IN REPLY TO:

    @webdevMason

    @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike Produce more coders, get more products/employers — (a) the ability to code is a toolkit for building products, but beyond that atm every strong coder has to turn down a deliciously inflated salary if they want to have a go at entrepreneurship

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888

  • Please thank Brandon Hayes for all the work he does for the institute and us all

    Please thank Brandon Hayes for all the work he does for the institute and us all.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-04 22:09:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092545790646603777