( It’s a strategy. I use the conflict as advertising. Try to remember that I built a top 25 digital marketing firm. Nothing travels like cockfighting. You want something to sell? Start a fight with someone. Seriously. We’re into the normie audience now so it’s less useful. )
Reply addressees: @VonPinetop
Category: Business, Organization, and Management
-
( It’s a strategy. I use the conflict as advertising. Try to remember that I bui
-
( It’s a strategy. I use the conflict as advertising. Try to remember that I bui
( It’s a strategy. I use the conflict as advertising. Try to remember that I built a top 25 digital marketing firm. Nothing travels like cockfighting. You want something to sell? Start a fight with someone. Seriously. We’re into the normie audience now so it’s less useful. )
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-29 17:17:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277652327697199105
Reply addressees: @VonPinetop
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277650090090475521
-
Rather frequent bit of idiocy. In ALL human organizations the Pareto allocation
Rather frequent bit of idiocy. In ALL human organizations the Pareto allocation of decidability on resources MUST follow Power Law for a voluntary organization of production (market) to form. Countries are poor because they can’t create it AND rule of law together.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-28 20:43:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277341951189225473
Reply addressees: @eugenegu
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277329291227742209
-
Rather frequent bit of idiocy. In ALL human organizations the Pareto allocation
Rather frequent bit of idiocy. In ALL human organizations the Pareto allocation of decidability on resources MUST follow Power Law for a voluntary organization of production (market) to form. Countries are poor because they can’t create it AND rule of law together.
Reply addressees: @eugenegu -
If you can tolerate that we’re working on it while you read it. The introduction
If you can tolerate that we’re working on it while you read it. The introduction is the home page of https://t.co/KLOZipO8HU
The acceleration recently forced us to go public early. We’re launching on the fourth.
Reply addressees: @RaffMaston -
( FYI: The institute doesn’t take calls from unlisted numbers. I just get text m
( FYI: The institute doesn’t take calls from unlisted numbers. I just get text messages that they were refused. Why? if it can’t be said in public we don’t want any part of it. We’re following in the footsteps of the founders for a very good reason.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-24 16:28:00 UTC
-
THE P-PROJECT IN ELEVATOR > NAPKIN > NORMIE > DUMMY > BOOK FORMS I need to finis
THE P-PROJECT IN ELEVATOR > NAPKIN > NORMIE > DUMMY > BOOK FORMS
I need to finish what I”m working on, but YES, I can make an :Elevator Pitch” version of P, the “Napkin” version you’re asking for, the Normiee version that’s already in the constitution, the Dummies Version, and the Full version.
1 – “ELEVATOR version” is: “It’s Four Points: 1 – it’s the scientific explanation for the extraordinary success of western civlization in and legal and economic terms; 2 – an explanation of how the left took advantage of loopholes in our civilization; 3 – a method for writing law that can’t be abused by cunning and malicious people; 4 – and an update to the constitution to reflect that explanation and plug those loopholes, so that our sovereignty, liberty, and freedom can’t even be spoken against without our laws demanding our violence to immediately suppress and punish it.”
2 – The NAPKIN version: there is a technical part, a legal part, and what we do with those parts to restore western civilization. The technical part is that if people can understand you can write software programs to tell a computer what to do but that don’t follow the rules will crash, that we can we can write law that follow the rules sovereignty and reciprocity (moral) and not expose themselves as false. In other words we can make constrain the law to what is unquestionably moral. Think of it like writing math proofs for human behavior. The only difference is you write programs to tell computers what to do because they can’t choose otherwise, and we write law to tell people what not to do because they can choose. But P-law consists of (literally) converting the law from ‘philosophical’ to ‘computable’ language – so you can’t lie. … The primary use of this law is that it lets us punish commercial, academic, political speech when *in public, to the public, in matters that are public*, that includes the technique by which leftists lied to our people: false promises of escape from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, to bait people into hazards, where they can be exploited. And it creates a very detailed checklist for use against them in court. And it allows us to use universal standing – meaning any one of us – can punish someone for immoral speech. … We update the constitution using this methodology and ‘plugged the holes’ by which our civilization was undermined. And we wrote a declaration of reformation with our ‘threat’ to demand and enact those amendments to correct the constitution.
3 – The NORMIE version exists in the Introduction to the Second Declaration. Really, if you understand that, it’s all anyone needs to understand. After that, read the Preamble, Article I – Rule of Law, Article III – Rights and obligations, and you’ve pretty much got what you need. Then read the rest of the constitution to understand what we’ve suggested.
4 – The DUMMIES version explains how the P-method works and all the different insights that derive from it. I’m not sure it’s a dummies version but it’s targeted to the college level audience.
5 – The BOOK (“The Law)” explains all of this for legal theorists, logicians, philosophers, Political scientists, social scientists, etc. Who want to master it. The almost two thousand pages that explain all of it in agonizing detail, is just more of the same.
I will work on this a bit more. And have the guys edit it, and see if we can get a flyer out.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-24 12:30:00 UTC
-
TEAM: CURT IS WORKING ON (HAS CHECKED OUT) The Second Declaration – Introduction
TEAM: CURT IS WORKING ON (HAS CHECKED OUT)
The Second Declaration – Introduction
Declaration of Reformation
Preamble
Article II – Rule of Law
Article III – Rights and Obligations
Editors pls avoid these documents.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-24 10:54:00 UTC
-
TESTIMONY —“Watched john mark, and found you. I’m in . We need to organize.”–
TESTIMONY
—“Watched john mark, and found you. I’m in . We need to organize.”–Catherine Reinke
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-24 10:18:00 UTC
-
This is always a futile discussion when we don’t have upper eschaton military pe
This is always a futile discussion when we don’t have upper eschaton military personnel, or at least professional project managers.
We have a strategy, we have tactics, and the plan is to seize opportunities. Which is how these things work.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-16 18:42:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272962871182479361
Reply addressees: @Freeman75216446
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1272962353332539392