Category: AI, Computation, and Technology

  • Blockchain

    BLOCKCHAIN I am not wrong very often. I wasn’t wrong on this subject either. Blockchain is an inadequate solution, and frankly I haven’t been able to understand how anyone could think otherwise except for having been stunned by the shiny object of the gold rush. IMHO, all we are doing is conducting R&D for post-money fiat money. Why? Because it eliminates the middle-man between the treasury and the people AND it eliminates the state’s ability to *DEFINE PROPERTY RIGHTS*. Even better it eliminates the ability for originators to package and sell loans and then evade responsibility for them. Moreover, it eliminates the problem of check cashing services, and the hard-money-economy of the ‘bottom’. All these things are profoundly important. But the libertarian fantasy that somehow an independent banking system will emerge is as absurd as it always has been. In the end, we have physical actors transferring physical assets, or all we are doing is playing a simulation. And the government can always and everywhere intercede in the physical world – simply because it is so profitable to do so. They have both every incentive and every resource as well as the public good at their disposal. So, while I appreciate that the nerd community wants to obtain sovereignty – all we are doing is devoting our free time and energy to funding the replacement for current absurdly antiquated, third party driven, financial system. This is to say that Holochain is a good step forward. It is also to say that blockchain was … childish… in my opinion as a technologist and political economist. Fun but childish. (And yes I lost I think something under 20K on a blockchain tech investment – but I knew I would. I was helping a friend. ) I can’t quite see a fully operational holochain platform, and the language used in the space is profoundly obscurant, so I have to reserve advocacy until I am capale of doing it honestly. That said it’s much closer to the result. On the other hand a monolithic and redundant system run by the private sector under state contract directly for the treasury is how I expect the solution to roll out. And it is the people who sell the government on that solution that will make all the money. I’d do it but I’m too busy trying to make a revolution ….

  • BLOCKCHAIN I am not wrong very often. I wasn’t wrong on this subject either. Blo

    BLOCKCHAIN

    I am not wrong very often. I wasn’t wrong on this subject either. Blockchain is an inadequate solution, and frankly I haven’t been able to understand how anyone could think otherwise except for having been stunned by the shiny object of the gold rush.

    IMHO, all we are doing is conducting R&D for post-money fiat money. Why? Because it eliminates the middle-man between the treasury and the people AND it eliminates the state’s ability to *DEFINE PROPERTY RIGHTS*. Even better it eliminates the ability for originators to package and sell loans and then evade responsibility for them. Moreover, it eliminates the problem of check cashing services, and the hard-money-economy of the ‘bottom’.

    All these things are profoundly important.

    But the libertarian fantasy that somehow an independent banking system will emerge is as absurd as it always has been. In the end, we have physical actors transferring physical assets, or all we are doing is playing a simulation.

    And the government can always and everywhere intercede in the physical world – simply because it is so profitable to do so. They have both every incentive and every resource as well as the public good at their disposal.

    So, while I appreciate that the nerd community wants to obtain sovereignty – all we are doing is devoting our free time and energy to funding the replacement for current absurdly antiquated, third party driven, financial system.

    This is to say that Holochain is a good step forward. It is also to say that blockchain was … childish… in my opinion as a technologist and political economist. Fun but childish. (And yes I lost I think something under 20K on a blockchain tech investment – but I knew I would. I was helping a friend. )

    I can’t quite see a fully operational holochain platform, and the language used in the space is profoundly obscurant, so I have to reserve advocacy until I am capale of doing it honestly. That said it’s much closer to the result.

    On the other hand a monolithic and redundant system run by the private sector under state contract directly for the treasury is how I expect the solution to roll out.

    And it is the people who sell the government on that solution that will make all the money.

    I’d do it but I’m too busy trying to make a revolution ….


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-12 18:50:00 UTC

  • @facebook FACEBOOK DOWN. NORTHEAST. NYCENTRAL

    @facebook FACEBOOK DOWN. NORTHEAST. NYCENTRAL


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 14:52:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981545003049799680

  • at 512GB, we need to get through terabytes and into petabytes, but once we get t

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x06avDdUggWell, at 512GB, we need to get through terabytes and into petabytes, but once we get to petabytes at current bus (switch) rates, we are getting pretty close to what I assume would equal a child’s brain.

    Now, we have about 1000 connections per neuron, and we store a distribution of general rules not precise values. So, it’s hard to see how we do that mechanically with current chip architecture.

    We run our brains on 100watts and this gpu is ~10k watts.Updated Mar 28, 2018, 12:37 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-28 12:37:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM.COM IS UP TO DATE, including site content, Facebook content, and

    http://propertarianism.com/FYI: PROPERTARIANISM.COM http://PROPERTARIANISM.COM IS UP TO DATE, including site content, Facebook content, and Quora content.

    (I haven’t been able to keep up with it since last fall, so I spent a few days exporting, and importing..)Updated Mar 27, 2018, 6:48 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-27 18:48:00 UTC

  • #DeleteFacebookNow THE SOLUTION: Sometimes the only way to win, is not to play t

    #DeleteFacebookNow THE SOLUTION: Sometimes the only way to win, is not to play the game. FB and Google made a mistake, by trying to maximize ad revenue as ad platforms, rather than running their business as modern infrastructure, just like the ISP’s, and letting govt’s police it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-24 20:55:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/977650244858142720

  • #DeleteFacebook THE SOLUTION: Sometimes the only way to win, is not to play the

    #DeleteFacebook THE SOLUTION: Sometimes the only way to win, is not to play the game. FB and Google made a mistake, by trying to maximize ad revenue, as ad platforms, rather than running their business as modern infrastructure, just like the ISP’s, and letting govt’s police it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-24 20:54:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/977649966297600000

  • 4) My work mirrors yours except that I started with artificial intelligence (cal

    4) My work mirrors yours except that I started with artificial intelligence (calculability) and you started with literary analogy, both of us with economic, cognitive, and physical science between. Hence I ended up like Hayek with Law, and you with Jung’s Wisdom Lit.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 13:51:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975368995930083328

  • Why Do Programmers Prefer Two Large Monitors?

    I use three.
    Something to reference.
    Something to code.
    Something to communicate with.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-programmers-prefer-two-large-monitors

  • Why Do Programmers Prefer Two Large Monitors?

    I use three.
    Something to reference.
    Something to code.
    Something to communicate with.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-programmers-prefer-two-large-monitors