Author: Curt Doolittle

  • It’s good to both disagree AND to defend me. I don’t get that much defense onlin

    It’s good to both disagree AND to defend me. I don’t get that much defense online and I could use more of it. So let’s be tolerant of both. -hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-27 21:28:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784333801000251835

    Reply addressees: @volkuberalles @taiwtaiwb8

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784322476698223051

  • Q: CURT: “WHY CAN’T WE CENTRALIZE PRODUCTION?” There are some things the state c

    Q: CURT: “WHY CAN’T WE CENTRALIZE PRODUCTION?”

    There are some things the state can direct, which is largely defense, transportation and communication infrastructure, primary research and development in any competitive or comparative advantage, strategic trade policy, strategic industry, treasury, and law (courts). Of those, only ‘strategic industry’ is open to variations because the constitution of strategic industry varies constantly in time and over time.

    What is government good at:
    Capital formation and the organization of production and maintenance of those goods, services, and information that the private sector cannot achieve because of risk, time frame, and capacity to profit from it, while maintaining the production of a public good.

    Why is government bad at almost everything
    1. You’re apparently unaware of the “knowledge problem”: how government control creates poverty, corruption, and decline:
    (The knowledge problem, as articulated by economists, highlights the inherent limitations of governmental entities in acquiring the vast, dispersed information and the incentives necessary to produce goods, services, and information that the market can otherwise generate. This combination of ignorance and incentives leads to corruption within government as officials exploit their authority for personal gain in the absence of market disciplines and accountability.
    At the same time their failure and corruption degrade public trust and incentivize individuals to circumvent official channels, leading to the formation of black markets. These underground economies emerge not just as a symptom of regulatory and economic failure, but also as a pragmatic response by citizens seeking goods and services that are otherwise unattainable or exorbitantly priced due to government intervention. Thus, the knowledge problem underscores a fundamental challenge: without the nuanced understanding and incentives provided by market mechanisms, governmental interventions often result in widespread inefficiencies and societal corruption.)
    So 1. Failure of the pricing system to provide necessary complexity reduced to useful information 2. Necessary incompetence that results. 3. Lying and Corruption that results as a consequence. 4. The collapse of public trust, collapse of public incentives, public expansion of free riding, and the formation of black markets. 5. The resulting poverty as all these overhead costs more than exceed the costs and uncertainty of markets wherever markets CAN supply good services and information.

    What is the optimum role of government in the economy?
    1. Non Market Long Term Capital Production: Military, Infrastructure, Treasury, Insurance of Last Resort, – Possibly including medical infrastructure (buildings and equipment)
    2. Basic Research: not academic research but basic scientific and technological research that provides a competitive advantage.
    3. Venture Capitalist: Venture capitalist in strategic industry, formation of new industry, resulting public participation in profits of the industries governments have used public funds to invest in.
    If this means starting the production within the government, and when viable, turning it over to private sector management, or whether it means investing in private sector industries to maintain or expand comparative advantage, the utility of the government as an investor ‘and capitalist’ seeking returns for the public in lieu of taxes, is irrelevant. The government can accumulate capital in ventures that are necessary for the public good, useful for the public good, and that may take a long time to produce returns, while the private sector is better at making use of capital and producing returns on capital once a market exists.
    4. Subsidy of Primary Production: This is where our food supply requires vast regulation and reconstruction. And it is the only primary production that appears to be necessary,
    5. Insurer of Last Resort
    – Resolution of Conflicts (courts)
    – Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction
    – Defense
    And I’m reluctant to add these because they’re going to need vast reforms:
    – Catastrophic medical care
    – Catastrophic elder care
    – Catastrophic unemployment
    – Catastrophic genetic burden and resulting incompetence at survival.

    Everything else is better done by the private sector.

    Cheers.

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff0


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-27 20:09:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784313853313941504

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784287713564238087

  • RT @CloseCongress: The Propertarian Constitution with ⁦@curtdoolittle⁩ ‘All in O

    RT @CloseCongress: The Propertarian Constitution with ⁦@curtdoolittle⁩ ‘All in One’! ⁦@NatLawInstitute⁩ ⁦@backwoodhillbi1⁩ ⁦@JeffYoungerSho…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-27 18:17:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784285841818271946

  • WOMEN’S VOTE VS NATURAL LAW? Q: CURT: –“… does this imply that the pressure w

    WOMEN’S VOTE VS NATURAL LAW?
    Q: CURT: –“… does this imply that the pressure which (disastrously) gave women the right to vote was a legitimate pressure to advance cooperation rather than a degrading entropic effect over time? Does Natural Law demand that eventually one or the other must be provided to women, either the general vote or a house of their own?”– @WalterIII

    No.
    TLDR; The right of juridical defense must be equal for all regardless of merit, but the privilege of legislative offense must be unequal as is demonstrated responsibility for private and common at scale.

    Setting aside that it’s not at all clear that voting for or against anything other than the monarchy and cabinet’s raising of funds has any value at all, and instead may in fact be foolish vs the use of courts that limit activism and demands to the adversarial competition in court bound by truth, evidence, and liability for both. At present it certainly appears that universal democracy is, as ancients warned us, no matter how much catharsis we feel from our vote, a race to the bottom. This is not to say that a subset of the population with demonstrated competency, responsibility, and loyalty should not vote – if for no other reason than to prevent violent conflict when the monarchy and cabinet and bureaucracy have betrayed the interests of the responsible and the people by proxy. There is only one scientific means of testing for responsibility and competency and that’s trough demonstration of it at scale.

    That said, let’s answer the question:

    1) We must all insure one another’s via-negativa defense in court under the common natural law. In other words meritocracy is irrelevant in there resolution of disputes over demonstrated interests. Conversely, the via positiva production of commons under that common natural law is dependent upon demonstrated capacity for responsibility not only of the self, and family, but economy and polity – as such depends upon meritocracy. A meritocracy that has largely been removed from all our branches of government other than perhaps the presidency and what conservatism remains in the supreme court.

    2) However, have we done our due diligence in training women in education and expanding our laws against feminine intuition to mother – meaning encourage irresponsibility and independence and variation instead of discouraging them and facilitating the extension of childhood, immaturity, and irresponsibility, and the parasitism upon men that has resulted? No we have not.

    3) The conservative approach to problems is to solve them quickly, decisively, and if necessary, harshly, in order to prevent the harms that arise from human behavior’s tendency to the short term parasitic whenever possible. However, the aristocratic and the most evolutionary approach, is to use the power of the manor, education (church), the government, monarchy if you’re lucky enough to have one, and if necessary the military and militia, to impose training (education), regulation (law), and and discipline (courts) to eradicate a behavior that even if it ‘feels’ just and right to the individual, is in fact, a violation of the natural law.

    4) Why? Because it is the natural law alone, and our responsibilities under it, that ameliorate the majority of our differences, by demanding we all carry those responsibilities, regardless of our preferences, such that we produce sovereignty for one another – and that is the only equality that is possible whatsoever: the sovereignty, liberty, and freedom to self determination by self determined means, free of imposition of costs on the same, by the freedom of imposition of costs on one another’s demonstrated interests.

    There is more political science and philosophy in these four points than you will find in many combined works. Because it really is just that simple. 😉

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-27 14:42:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784231593097191425

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784216174265586112

  • its a measure of the mainstreaming of the idea

    its a measure of the mainstreaming of the idea,


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-27 12:11:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784193760718385376

    Reply addressees: @volkuberalles

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784120670130995517

  • It makes my day every time. love you man. 😉

    It makes my day every time. love you man. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-27 12:10:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784193491213365320

    Reply addressees: @NickmhTw @GenghisBrahn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784141325778198748

  • RT @curtdoolittle: Let Me Help You: Given: PRIORITY OF COMMON INTEREST: . . . .

    RT @curtdoolittle: Let Me Help You:

    Given:
    PRIORITY OF COMMON INTEREST:
    . . . . . . . . . . . . Christian Nationalist
    . . . . . . . . .…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-27 07:17:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784119591720952057

  • “Apparently casual RACISM is okay now”

    “Apparently casual RACISM is okay now” https://youtube.com/shorts/B5sC4SzlA_0?si=TYf3l6ino-MbLUHl


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-27 07:10:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784118006634647795

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @GenghisBrahn No. As counter intuitive as it seems, agreeable

    RT @curtdoolittle: @GenghisBrahn No. As counter intuitive as it seems, agreeableness tends to favor consensus instead of truth regardless o…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-26 23:42:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784005250560499739

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @OKFootball2 @bryanbrey @hendry_hugh Q: CURT: WILL THE PUBLIC

    RT @curtdoolittle: @OKFootball2 @bryanbrey @hendry_hugh Q: CURT: WILL THE PUBLIC STOCK MARKET STILL EXIST IN THE COMING DECADES?
    Yes for re…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-26 23:42:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784005102946095340