Author: Curt Doolittle

  • I don’t know why you think so. I’ve laid it out for public record. I’m pretty su

    I don’t know why you think so. I’ve laid it out for public record. I’m pretty sure I’m pretty close. It’s what I’d do in trump’s place. I still don’t think he’ll win. But for these reasons I hope so. (I don’t know why you really claim it’s short of fact, principle, and politics.…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:39:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811093020286275779

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811091568897515587

  • You’re inspiring. lol 😉

    You’re inspiring. lol 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:38:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811092544584925217

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist @Dylboz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811090736147755424

  • Q: “CAN REDNECKS TAKE OVER THE GOVERNMENT?” (HINT: EASILY) You dont need to take

    Q: “CAN REDNECKS TAKE OVER THE GOVERNMENT?”
    (HINT: EASILY)
    You dont need to take over a government, only force the ascent of clarification of existing constitutional laws, and the production of new laws. There are plenty of people willing to work in government. They are not the same people willing to CHANGE government.
    Why is it that because I’ve ‘done a revolution’ already, and I write a few posts on how a small number of people can collapse the federal government, the American economy, and American geostrategic position, including examples of how to take and decimate a major city, especially in winter, and I end up with the FBI in my kitchen once a month for quite a bit.
    And that’s only a simple version. The total collapse of the federal government into a subset of east coastal states, the total collapse of NY as a financial center, the collapse of the dollar, and the subsequent collapse of federal institutions and the US military, are relatively easy to bring about over a six to nine month to twelve month period.
    And some nitwits think that a military with 2M people of whom only 200k are in fighting roles, and in practical terms only 80k are capable of fighting, and all of which are tied down in maintaining the global order of finance and trade, when combined with 400k national guardsmen, where all those people are prohibited from any and all domestic action other than supporting police, and only two cities in the USA have police forces capable of suppressing even an ordinary riot. And when a predicted seventy or more percent of those military personnel are expected to resist in place (do nothing) or actively reject applying violence against the population.
    Now, I’ve been asked (threatened) not to ‘advise or encourage’ such revolutionary behavior here in the states.
    Any group of special forces men, no more than 300, could shut down the USA in 30 days or less. It would take 2-5M men in DC 90 days.
    Conservative men are by far the largest army in the world by an order of magnitude, that would be fighting a combination of local, state, and federal employees of varying willingness to outright refusal. They wouold not fight the federal government. They would do what we did in ukraine. Show up at police, military, and federal employees homes threatening their families, shutting down political and bureaucratic offices, as well as communication.
    Fire is the greatest solider. It does not tire. It only gains momentum. It takes extraordinary resources to combat it. The people cannot survive without food transport, communications, electricity, water. The batteries in Cell towers are sustainable only for short periods – hours or days.
    So nitwits keep thinking that the US military can fight it’s own population, when it can’t even take over a small arab country. And our military is 0 wins 4 losses against domestic warfare.
    Our government would acquiesce in 30-90 days.
    It only lasted three weeks against the civil rights (marxists).
    It can’t even put down a year of terrorism by antifa.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @AltHistCody


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:37:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811092389357875201

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810920133822497002

  • We knew it was happening. But I had no idea it was 90% of ad dollars. That’s a c

    We knew it was happening. But I had no idea it was 90% of ad dollars. That’s a cartel. That’s going to have legs.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:15:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811086852218093987

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist @benshapiro @Jim_Jordan @realDailyWire @realDonaldTrump @joerogan @elonmusk @FoxNews @BreitbartNews

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811086535351042225

  • RT @benshapiro: Breaking: @Jim_Jordan’s House Judiciary Committee finds @realdai

    RT @benshapiro: Breaking: @Jim_Jordan’s House Judiciary Committee finds @realdailywire, @realDonaldTrump, @joerogan, @elonmusk, @foxnews, @…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:14:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811086625591673032

  • FYI. FBI “Agents” (domestic) vs CIA “Officers” (foreign). Not sure why this conf

    FYI. FBI “Agents” (domestic) vs CIA “Officers” (foreign). Not sure why this confusion still persists. People like me are either consultants or contractors. I have been a Justice Department “Employee”.

    We need to end job protections, unions, and pensions for federal workers. It will raise short term salaries improve employee quality and but reduce long term costs.

    Federal employees must ‘serve at the pleasure of the president’.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:12:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811086128977440768

  • MEN’S FASHION: “THE FORMULA” Trimmed facial hair, trimmed hair, a light cologne

    MEN’S FASHION: “THE FORMULA”
    Trimmed facial hair, trimmed hair, a light cologne (I use Obsession), brown Italian loafers, khaki slacks even if jean cut, matching leather belt, white button down shirt with high thread count (weight). Socks in cool weather, without socks in warm weather. Throw on a blue, black, or brown sports jacket to improve. Add a pocket square to take it further. Keep a tie with some red rolled in your pocket, backpack, messenger bag, or glove compartment. Add a watch if you want the decoration. I prefer an odd American brand (Hamilton), but I really have given up on watches as gilding a lily so to speak (trying too hard). Phones are enough. Tech watches are omg lame.

    For myself, toggle between black and white button down shirts (Nordstrom Smartcare Button Down or LL Bean Pinpoint or Regular Oxford) but I have a handful of blue and yellow, as well as a handful of black jeans. On top of that I have an ungodly number of shoes I rarely wear, and find Vans are the best all around casual shoe that can handle a sport jacket. But if you need a tie stick with the loafers.

    You can wear this basically every day like a uniform and you will always look good. I have a selection of about a dozen expensive >100$ silk handkerchiefs for pocket squares.

    If you are lucky or smart enough to have laundry at home, then keep two baskets for lights and darks, and to laundry no less than every two or three days, by turning the clothes inside out, and then letting them air dry by hanging them in a doorway on the trim.

    Put on pair of running shorts and sit in the sun facing the sun for fifteen to twenty minutes once every two weeks to build color but not a tan. Otherwise stay out of the sun. Drink lots of water. You really only need to lift a few weights a few days a week, and eat clean.

    As long as you keep your weight down you can’t look other than ‘great’.

    READ:
    1) How to be a gentleman: https://t.co/61i2ZxQhbi
    There are many books on the topic but this one I can recommend because most are just copies of it.

    2) Esquire’s Handbook of Style
    https://t.co/Fvj1kaUO13
    Many books but this one is correct and always will be.

    3) You can also read George Washington’s “Rules of Civility” (that he wrote at 14).
    https://t.co/qXI9zGINuH

    Aristocratic virtues require continuous policing of your display word and deed. This, combined with the daily pursuit of virtues, produces stoicism. You cannot ‘go wrong’ but simply reading any number of books of etiquette. You’d be surprised how militaristically ritualistic western high culture had become.

    WHY DOES THIS MATTER?
    We are going through the collapse of the hedonistic cycle after which usually emerges a return to formalism. I would suggest that yes there are a class of men who favor ‘getting pumped’ but in general, that will not mean attracting opportunities for responsibility that produce wealth. Instead, men who cycle or run, and dress well attract opportunity. Success at opportunity attracts women.

    CLOSING
    You cannot go wrong with ‘the formula’. It is still the high point of western men’s fashion, and it is unlikely to be surpassed as long as our civilization endures.

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist @Dylboz


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:03:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811083809611190272

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810908031737094157

  • Presidents are LIMITED in what they can achieve becasue we have poorly structure

    Presidents are LIMITED in what they can achieve becasue we have poorly structured the law to enable them to suppress the criminality that the 18th-20th has made possible – particularly through financialism.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 16:24:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811073911108375004

    Reply addressees: @cryptohodler16

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811070361909231679

  • AI CONSCIOUSNESS? –“consciousness arises from perception, not sensation”– Hmmm

    AI CONSCIOUSNESS?
    –“consciousness arises from perception, not sensation”–

    Hmmmm. As you mean it yes, but not entirely true. All consciousness arises from the competition between perception, it’s formation of episodes, and the association of those episodes and their components with memories. So all perception begins with sensation.

    More correctly: Consciousness is a simple and necessary consequence of enough recursive prediction to predict the predictions of others.

    The brain is a very simple thing using a trivial process consisting of auto-associative prediction, selection of a future state, and wayfinding a means of adapting current state the future desired state.

    Simple physical action is pre-calculated in parallel with each selection. Otherwise we use wayfinding (recursion) to determine the means of changing from current to desired state.

    Why? All thought evolved from the necessity of a bilateral morphology coordinating movement between sides of body and brain, and once that was achieved, coordinating movements over time to hunt, nest(rest), reproduce.

    As such, for those of us who know such things, the combination of place, space, location world indexing (episodic memory), auto-associative prediction of episodes or components, and the A* (a-star, wayfinding) algorithm, are all brains need to do.

    But the bigger the brain volume the more hierarchy (in our case back to front) the more abstract are possible the auto-associative predictions.

    Current AI is far too primitive to produce wayfinding that is falsificationary (edits out falsehoods). It will take multiple competing agents, producing multiple competing auto-associative predictions, through multiple iterations.

    But that does not mean the AI cannot get there.

    IMO, the present problem is not the code but the lack of neuromorphic hardware, and the necessity of training data that is not false, and then training the ai’s to detect falsehoods. In other words, we’re 20% of the way there.

    Thanks
    CurtD

    Reply addressees: @tsarnick @TravelsCharlie


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 16:20:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811073005197357056

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810921826715062361

  • Creating a conscious machine conscious of our consciousness is not a hard proble

    Creating a conscious machine conscious of our consciousness is not a hard problem. The hard problem is the scale of computation necessary to achieve it. I assume Joscha understands this but I’d have to ask him to be certain.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 16:06:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811069605097415127

    Reply addressees: @tsarnick

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810896746748522561