Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Q: “WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE BLUE STATES OF THE NORTHEAST?” Let’s start with Connec

    Q: “WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE BLUE STATES OF THE NORTHEAST?”

    Let’s start with Connecticut:
    The Good: if you live in the non-urban green zones in CT that are still remnants of the pre-war economy, or if you live in Fairfield county, which is a tax haven for NYC, it’s a beautiful countryside in all four seasons.

    The Bad: However, other than that, there is a lot of bad. Connecticut is effectively bankrupt. The state employee pensions are unfunded, unfundable and unpayable. The Government has driven every business out of the state that isn’t military. The tax policy alone, the power of the unions, the decline of the cities made it impossible to recruit talent combined with failure to produce enough housing that drove up the cost of living, combined with exhaustively open immigration that drove down wages, combined with the general failure of post 1970 education drove not only business but people out of the state as well. The most valuable people, those who are able to obtain a STEM education, or employment under a higher quality of life, leave Connecticut at the first opportunity. The people are generally considered nihilistic. Connecticut is the second worst state for Starting businesses, and tech biz is almost impossible. (Otherwise I would have built not one company in CT and eleven in other states). Everyone who CAN leave DOES leave. Every business that can leave does leave.

    Fairfield county is the only reason the state economically survives. Otherwise the state would fiscally collapse. Everything along 91 and 95 for three miles around it is a slum all the way down to Fairfield County. The most dangerous cities in Connecticut are Hartford, New Haven, Waterbury, New Britain, and Plainville. Hartford’s overall crime rate is 81% above the national average, with a violent crime rate 180% over the national average. Other dangerous cities in Connecticut are Bloomfield, Derby, New London, East Windsor, and East Hartford.

    The Connecticut river valley until WW2 was one of the best places to live in human history – comparable only to the Loire Valley in France.

    Why? Because Yale, Trinity, and Wesleyan, combined with New England Women as the origin of Progressivism, were at least positive movements, but combined with the pre and postwar labor movement, and especially the 1960s leftist movements, adopted more soviet policy than any other state in the union.

    But unlike MA, which had to reform because of the shock of losing the technology industry to california, CT did not reform. And the public keeps doubling down. And demographically, and because of demographics, economically, and because of economically, politically, there is no chance it can be corrected.

    So until the Federal Government creates the possibility for States to go Bankrupt and renegotiate their contracts and debts (particularly with state employee unions), CT will follow other dying regions. With the top most indebted states being In order (Mass, CT, RI, NY NJ, NH, VT, Illinois, Maryland, Delaware).
    In other words Blue = Debt.

    So all the northeast’s blue states are dying. If so then why don’t they know it? What’s wrong with the people of the northeast?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 20:16:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811132299506802688

  • Educate me please?

    Educate me please?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 19:31:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811121000349847765

    Reply addressees: @ChrisWenzel2 @hbd_orbiter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811120831621173751

  • I not only believe it but I’m certain of it. 😉 Nothing I said is not common kno

    I not only believe it but I’m certain of it. 😉
    Nothing I said is not common knowledge in intel circles.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 19:28:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811120266371551261

    Reply addressees: @hbd_orbiter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811112277426250045

  • Not a consideration given that for all intents and purposes distances are irrele

    Not a consideration given that for all intents and purposes distances are irrelevant when considering nuclear weapons.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 19:27:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811120068018983201

    Reply addressees: @William68332190

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811115870241890396

  • Easy: homo sapiens sapiens

    Easy: homo sapiens sapiens.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 18:53:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811111606425731520

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810904897065222438

  • Only because RU wants direct access over land through the sowalki gap. We should

    Only because RU wants direct access over land through the sowalki gap. We should not have let RU keep that once great german territory at the end of the war. If they have that, then they have a port that is much less likely to freeze in the baltic. I don’t think we need to do anything with “Koenigsberg”. The population is already turning toward europe, and as russia weakens it will seek independence/

    Reply addressees: @William68332190


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 18:16:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811102226556850176

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811098038372286638

  • @whatifalthist and followers: I follow you (RL) but not so much comments directe

    @whatifalthist and followers:

    I follow you (RL) but not so much comments directed at you. I had a chance to browse through a wide range of comments here and YT and given we’re pretty close friends, I’m kind of set off by some of the criticisms – not of your work (which is pretty hard to criticize), but instead of you personally.

    Why the heck to people think you’re autistic or a nerd? Is it just a vast difference in your maturity for your age, while you still maintain the humor of your youth? (I suspect it’s something like that) Intellectuals aren’t that nerdy. You certainly aren’t. You’re exceptionally graceful in social conditions. Well mannered. A great conversationalist and good leader even if you’d prefer to preserve your think time rather than take responsibility for herding cats. That doesn’t mean you’re going to find stimulation in ‘normie’ interests. I mean, the swords thing? How many of us went through that phase but didn’t have the money to buy them? I don’t know what else could stick out.

    And what is this about being autistic? Well, you know, as someone very low on the aspergers spectrum myself, autism is just the extreme male systematizing brain. You’re very male brained in that sense. Are they confusing your fascination for accumulating wisdom with autism? You don’t demonstrate any of the autistic traits of lack of capacity for empathic understanding – just the opposite.

    Is it because you’re so concerned for the men of your generation (because you know what happens when they reach critical mass) that they think you’re projecting?

    And what is it with these people claiming your an incel? WTH? I guess you don’t talk about the women you’re dating or courting? And I can attest to the hotness of at least the one I met and the few others I know of. So where is this nonsense coming from?

    Is it a class thing? You probably consider yourself middle or upper middle class but you are from a background of academic parenting.

    I mean, exceptional people are often idiosyncratic or eccentric, (I’m certainly eccentric) and maybe you have a little of that, but otherwise you’re just normal from my perspective other than you’re extremely intelligent, studied, mature, wise, and thoughtful for your age.

    Is it the dissonance between your age, your generation, your sense of humor, and what you study and talk about? (Again, I think that might be it).

    I’m probably asking these questions rhetorically, because they’re really directed at your followers.

    How can you produce that much content and do so with so much personal openness, and yet some people understand you so poorly? Is it something as foolish as self image protection by those who can’t understand your work?

    Someone please explain this to me?

    Because the guy I know is just a very smart normie who has some long tail playfulness of youth at one and and wisdom of scholars three (four?) times his age on the other.

    Thanks


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 18:14:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811101681456926721

  • You know, you are also inspirational in such lofty ambitions as talking smack, p

    You know, you are also inspirational in such lofty ambitions as talking smack, polysyllabic ridicule, and hyperbolic absurdity.

    But then, that’s part of your charm. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 18:02:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811098751093903652

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist @Dylboz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811092607713378329

  • Part two. Turkey can control the black sea becase it owns the bosphorus straight

    Part two. Turkey can control the black sea becase it owns the bosphorus straight. Turkey is in nato. Turkey is not a good nato ally. But it would love to control the reset of the blacksea without concern for russia. Without the black sea, russia has only polar ports closed to passage in winter. While it is hard to close the eastern ports, it’s trivial to close the western ports and the black sea.
    Russia is preserving her air power in case of escalation. But her land power is almost done.

    Reply addressees: @hbd_orbiter


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:50:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811095717546708993

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811092685907808636

  • Putin miscalculated because he is so afraid of technology that he only accepts p

    Putin miscalculated because he is so afraid of technology that he only accepts paper and verbal reports. He foolishily believed what he was being told byhis people – which is evidence of the failure of despotism. Are his actions otherwise rational? Of course. Given he believed the nonsense from his generals, his intelligence service, and his miltary suppliers. Given our previous reactions to his expansionary militarism in the caucuses. Given our reaction to his taking of donbas and crimea. Given the election of Biden not trump. He made a calculation based on bad information. And now he’s stuck. Because he’s going to be murdered if he loses power. The US strategy has been consistent, which is to wear down russia’s military, economy, and political legitimacy – which is taking far longer than we’d hoped or expected, but it’s working. So as long as the Ukrainian’s are willing to fight, russia will continue to bleed out until they must come to the table. And hopefully, if russia falls far enough we can integrate them rather than have them fall to china and minorities in the east, and islam from the center and south.
    I’m not ‘special’. I’m just someone sympathetic to the extreme right wing, and in return some of them tend to listen to. As far as I know all geostrategic thinkers (most of whom I know) understand this.
    The variable isn’t russia. The variable isn’t europe. Europe is doing what trump wanted them to. The variable is the potential evolution int he USA which could turn the whole world into chaos. Or the triggering of war with china which would mean we might not pay enough attention to russia over ukraine and the baltics.

    Reply addressees: @hbd_orbiter


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:47:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811095009875099649

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811092685907808636