Author: Curt Doolittle

  • yes, while driving, and it truncated quite a bit…. 🙁

    yes, while driving, and it truncated quite a bit…. 🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-12 01:26:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988418118352597514

  • ELON ( @elonmusk ) FYI: The benchmarks are focusing too much on internal closure

    ELON (
    @elonmusk
    )
    FYI: The benchmarks are focusing too much on internal closure which is the easiest domain of computation.

    Our organization has solved the problem of external closure – and it’s a very, very, hard problem that has troubled philosophers and scientists for decades if not millennia.

    We can handle everything from truth to ethics to possibility and from economics to law to the humanities. We make human-free recursively improving AI possible.

    We’re trying to get within a degree of you so we can show you or your team.

    Cheers
    CD
    Runcible Inc,

    http://
    runcible.com
    And
    The Natural Law Institute Inc.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-12 01:25:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988417937297076673

  • Just thoughts, I reminded today that most of the time you can’t, you can’t pay a

    Just thoughts, I reminded today that most of the time you can’t, you can’t pay any attention to the left their commentary on anything most of the time you can’t pay any attention to the extreme right on pretty much anything, but you can most of the time pay pay a lot of attention to the center right but why is that? It’s because Harley Harley for the masculine versus feminine difference and perception of rule of events and partly because of the simple reality is that center right people tend to have responsibilities And center left to left people 10 not to oh that’s hard to understand if you don’t grasp my classification there, but what I mean a responsibility is that they have economic responsibility for the for the for family business, particularly business and and in the employment of staff so when you have those people that have responsibility for that kind of capital I don’t mean capital at work I mean in the in the financial sector I mean capital at work and production distribution trade those people have an understanding of what responsibility is that BN as such they have agency the people that complain are usually those that have neither responsibility or agency so that’s very often someone who works. Let’s say in the academy or the medical industry or some other industry or the government or in some white color job where they have questionable influence, questionable Value, and those people are a huge population yet on the flipside you have you have people who have the the deep deep end and necessary action ability in their world, and they do have responsibility and agency and they can perceive the world as it is rather than as the flock of sparrows perceives it because their members of a flock so I just want to put that out there aswhen we’re seeing the propaganda machine spin up right now because of things like job job losses, etc., or the presumed impact of tariffs or whatever or or the fact that we’ve now put


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-12 00:40:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988406559328924041

  • WHY I LISTEN TO WOMEN I’ve been told consistently that the success I have had wi

    WHY I LISTEN TO WOMEN
    I’ve been told consistently that the success I have had with relationships (women) is that I actually listen and seek to understand, despite the volume, loading and framing they do – which they NEED to. The benefit of listening to women is that it’s like getting an extra nervous system and brain that sees the personal and interpersonal world with the same resolution I see the causal and systemic world. Recognizing that value is why I listen to women. Recognizing it’s limits is why I regulate women’s influence in the economic, political, and strategic realms.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-11 20:09:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988338411267387629

  • You’re just practicing wishful thinking. All the incentive money and opportunity

    You’re just practicing wishful thinking. All the incentive money and opportunity is doing nothing but expanding.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-11 18:56:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988320033945292942

  • No. Groups use different strategies, those strategies reflect their degree of ne

    No. Groups use different strategies, those strategies reflect their degree of neoteny, degree of development, and their group evolutionary strategy.
    Semitic group srategy whether jewish or muslim is hostile to western group strategy. Deal with it.
    Jews are integrating out outbreeding rapidly in the USA, despite their fondness for industries that profit from ‘baiting into hazard’ (asymmetric risk). And their group strategy is separatist and hostile.
    Muslims show no sign of integation and their group strategy is conquest by demographic and cultural means. Hence the destruction of six civilizations of teh ancient world, and theh lost of their arts, letters, traditions and rates of development.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-11 01:03:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988049975830548596

  • This is due to the immaturity of the product, and the hype necessary to fund it

    This is due to the immaturity of the product, and the hype necessary to fund it despite it’s low profitability – until it’s mature.

    I’ve been repeating this argument for a couple of months now, but the future of LLMs, is brighter than ever.

    Why?

    There are at least the remaining issues:
    1 – episodic memory,
    2 – associative prediction,
    3 – abstraction,
    4 – solution point wayfinding (real reasoning),
    5 – ethics,
    6 – and decidability.

    We have solved the hardest ones: ethics and decidability. We know how to solve most of the rest of them. The problem isn’t know-how. The problem is the extraordinary costs of those innovations using extant technology rather than neuromorphic hardware.

    Our work, that I know of, is the only solution to revenue production sufficient to cover those costs.

    Cheers
    CD
    Runcible

    http://
    Runcible.com


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-11 01:00:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988049180317937789

  • RE: Stalin as Hero You’re either trolling or a nitwit. –“Joseph Stalin is estim

    RE: Stalin as Hero
    You’re either trolling or a nitwit.
    –“Joseph Stalin is estimated to be responsible for the deaths of between 6 million and 20 million people during his rule, with some estimates suggesting the number could be as high as 60 million.”–

    Other than Mao he’s the greatest murderer of his own people in human history.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-11 00:56:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988048068512756074

  • “… thesis is that every AI application startup is likely to be crushed by rapi

    –“… thesis is that every AI application startup is likely to be crushed by rapid expansion of the foundational model providers.”–

    This is true. That doesn’t mean the foundation model providers are the best innovators. Our work is revolutionary in machine decidability and AGI is impossible without it.

    So the market is there, but the challenge of providing the foundation model producers with something they cannot or have not done themselves. In other words the window is narrowing and the difficulty is increasing.

    There are at least the remaining issues: episodic memory, associative prediction, abstraction, solution point wayfinding, ethics, and decidability.

    We have solved the hardest one. We know how to solve most them. The problem isn’t know how. The problem is the extraordinary costs of those innovations using extant rather than neuromorphic hardware.

    Our work, that I know of, is the only solution to revenue production sufficient to cover those costs.

    CD
    Runcible Inc

    http://
    runcible.com


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-11 00:53:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988047436657684832

  • Because the Chinese are not communists, they’re fascists. Which is rather obviou

    Because the Chinese are not communists, they’re fascists. Which is rather obvious if you grasp the meaning of the terms. They’re a page right out of hitler’s work, both domestically and internationally. They just maintain the air of the communist party for legacy reasons.

    They use state capitalism, and authoritarianism, and racism as such they are fascists. They do not use central planning and state run economy (it failed repeatedly), they use strategic planning which democracies can’t, they use aggressive suppression, and they have terminal demographics, a polluted territory, and not enough food to feed their people, and no energy supplies of their own.

    They are however, trying successfully to dominate engineering and production – which is the optimum strategy for a fascist government. The easy solution then is simply isolation, repatriation, tarriffs, sanctions, and boycotts.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-11 00:47:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988045964968686063