Author: Curt Doolittle

  • If that’s the cost of re-industrialization, that’s a petty cost

    If that’s the cost of re-industrialization, that’s a petty cost.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 19:51:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907883621945639201

    Reply addressees: @PeterSchiff

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907812445260800264

  • EXPLAINING TRUMP’S WORLD RESTRUCTURING BY SHOCK Trump is reorganizing world secu

    EXPLAINING TRUMP’S WORLD RESTRUCTURING BY SHOCK

    Trump is reorganizing world security and trade. He is doing it quickly and unpleasantly (to get it over with) using security and tariffs – because asking and negotiating didn’t work. To create the world order we have had three phases:
    1 – Bretton Woods Order: Subsidizing the world recovery, and limiting authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our industrial advantage)
    2 – Neoliberal Order: Subsidizing world finance and ending the authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our middle and working classes.)
    3 – Trump’s Restoration of Traditional Order: Ending the subsidies, redistributing the cost of world order, whether defense or transport and trade. (Cost: disruption of alliances, economy, and ‘deep state’ – all of which were creations of the Anglo-USA remains of the British empire at the end of WWII.)
    Retrospectively the world wars were the necessary end of agrarian land empires and the emergence of federations of industrial nation states. The generals were correct in their criticism claiming we ended World War II early. We assumed islam was defeated, and we failed to defeat the communists in China and the authoritarians in Russia. While islam will be readily defeated with little effort if exported from our lands, and while russia will shrink dramatically by depopulation. The chinese only slightly less so.
    The end of ’empires’ and the conversion to alliances of Nation States – likely by race and civilization, will continue only after the remaining empires are defeated. The USA assumes they will outlive the ability of these empires as we did the communists. But chinese fascism (not communism) has been so successful at massive industrialization and trade capture that the outcome of the ‘debate’ may still be in question.
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 19:49:43 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1907883229627166930

  • Untitled

    http://x.com/i/article/1907882677702995968


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 19:49:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907883229627166930

  • Trump is reorganizing world security and trade. He is doing it quickly and unple

    Trump is reorganizing world security and trade. He is doing it quickly and unpleasantly (to get it over with) using security and tariffs – because asking and negotiating didn’t work. To create the world order we have had three phases:

    1 – Bretton Woods Order: Subsidizing the world recovery, and limiting authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our industrial advantage)

    2 – Neoliberal Order: Subsidizing world finance and ending the authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our middle and working classes.)

    3 – Trump’s Restoration of Traditional Order: Ending the subsidies, redistributing the cost of world order, whether defense or transport and trade. (Cost: disruption of alliances, economy, and ‘deep state’ – all of which were creations of the Anglo-USA remains of the British empire at the end of WWII.)

    Retrospectively the world wars were the necessary end of agrarian land empires and the emergence of federations of industrial nation states. The generals were correct in their criticism claiming we ended World War II early. We assumed islam was defeated, and we failed to defeat the communists in China and the authoritarians in Russia. While islam will be readily defeated with little effort if exported from our lands, and while russia will shrink dramatically by depopulation. The chinese only slightly less so.

    The end of ’empires’ and the conversion to alliances of Nation States – likely by race and civilization, will continue only after the remaining empires are defeated. The USA assumes they will outlive the ability of these empires as we did the communists. But chinese fascism (not communism) has been so successful at massive industrialization and trade capture that the outcome of the ‘debate’ may still be in question.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 19:47:31 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1907882677702995968

  • Well, you know, when I lived in russia and ukraine, there was no evidence of ‘wo

    Well, you know, when I lived in russia and ukraine, there was no evidence of ‘woke’ – especially the female psychosis version of it.

    When I was living in rural new england for a bit, I met a lot of working and lower middle class folk. Very little interpersonal woke nonsense despite the antisocial mainstream behavior of younger new englanders (which I have come to despise.)

    But now when I get closer to Seattle (yesterday, in Kirkland) I ran into more of the woke cancer. And while I already have the sense that as a business exec I’d prefer not to hire any women without careful screening against woke, that its infected the service worker layer of women so badly that I want to visit businesses only run by men.

    And I’m wondering… will we end up with the sexual isolationism of islam at this rate? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    I mean, no dating, no mating, no marrying, no reproduction and gradual depopulation, economic, political and strategic collapse – just so the neurotic women can play the feminine version of marxism?


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 19:54:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907882175758028800

  • OK. Seriously (not) Now: In my experience Canadian girls are easy. American girl

    OK. Seriously (not) Now:
    In my experience Canadian girls are easy. American girls are easier. British girls will beat you to the floor. So what’s the deal with Aussie girls. Do they start earlier or something? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    (I just feel like starting something) ๐Ÿ˜‰ https://twitter.com/DatingAppLs/status/1907877841678516234

  • EXPLAINING TRUMPIAN WORLD RESTRUCTURING Trump is reorganizing world security and

    EXPLAINING TRUMPIAN WORLD RESTRUCTURING
    Trump is reorganizing world security and trade. He is doing it quickly and unpleasantly (to get it over with) using security and tariffs – because asking and negotiating didn’t work.

    To create the world order we have had three phases:
    1 – Bretton Woods Order: Subsidizing the world recovery, and limiting authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our industrial advantage)
    2 – Neoliberal Order: Subsidizing world finance and ending the authoritarian communism. (Cost: burning our middle and working classes.)
    3 – Trump’s Restoration of Traditional Order: Ending the subsidies, redistributing the cost of world order, whether defense or transport and trade. (Cost: disruption of alliances, economy, and ‘deep state’ – all of which were creations of the Anglo-USA remains of the British empire at the end of WWII.)

    Retrospectively the world wars were the necessary end of agrarian land empires and the emergence of federations of industrial nation states. The generals were correct and we ended World War II early. We assumed islam was defeated, and we failed to defeat the communists in China and the authoritarians in Russia. While islam will be readily defeated with little effort if exported from our lands, and while russia will shrink dramatically by depopulation. The chinese only slightly less so. The end of ’empires’ and the conversion to alliances of Nation States – likely by race and civilization, will continue only after the remaining empires are defeated.

    The USA assumes they will outlive the ability of these empires. But chinese fascism (not communism) has been so successful at massive industrialization and trade capture that the outcome of the ‘debate’ may still be in question.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @CharlieShrem


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 19:36:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907879976986447872

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907785903877087578

  • Just the opposite. The reserve currency is our strategic advantage – just as muc

    Just the opposite. The reserve currency is our strategic advantage – just as much as the atlantic and pacific oceans. The dollar is strategic advantage because we actually have rule of law. The country would be saved by exporting ‘non-integrating’ minorities, and especially those with below 100 IQ group medians. Because population is rapidly going to be more of a problem than a benefit. So you want the smartest population, meaning the one with the least ‘dead weight’ demographic distribution. … Evolution isn’t merciful.

    Reply addressees: @RichardArion1


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 16:56:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907839525365362689

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907838645769302428

  • OMG.. lol

    OMG.. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 16:50:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907838126221140033

    Reply addressees: @travslier @NoomDynamite

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907835384970588671

  • The USD will be ‘saved’ if it need be, by the chaos caused by the US withdrawal

    The USD will be ‘saved’ if it need be, by the chaos caused by the US withdrawal from the policing of world sovereignty, finance, transport, and trade. The more chaos (war, conflict) in the world the better for the Dollar. The flight to the dollar is almost impossible to change during uncertainty – we have rule of law. By comparison no other country does. So the preservation of the dollar and the re-industrialization of the USA are Trump’s strategic objectives. The USA is all but economically autarkic. Other than the taiwan issue we are all but independent of need for trade.

    Reply addressees: @RichardArion1


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 16:50:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907838077911052294

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907828604974637452