Author: Curt Doolittle

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: “Signaling” emerges from the categorization by construction f

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: “Signaling” emerges from the categorization by construction frame. I can claim the virtue by social alignment.

    “Demonst…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-12 17:10:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921976336488304742

  • RT @dr_duchesne: Way I see it, the term “woke right” is a product of two psychol

    RT @dr_duchesne: Way I see it, the term “woke right” is a product of two psychological tendencies among right-wing liberals. First, they re…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-12 10:27:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921874910441267489

  • RT @bryan_caplan: Arguably the biggest change in higher ed in my lifetime: IQs o

    RT @bryan_caplan: Arguably the biggest change in higher ed in my lifetime: IQs of humanities profs have crashed.

    Back in the 80s, even E…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-12 10:22:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921873559036604487

  • RT @NoahRevoy

    RT @NoahRevoy: http://x.com/i/article/1921566068889309185


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-12 10:22:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921873491147526331

  • (great sentences) –“Women will change their beliefs and behavior to adapt to th

    (great sentences)

    –“Women will change their beliefs and behavior to adapt to the richest source of attention.”– @ItIsHoeMath


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-12 10:19:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921872980008739106

  • (great sentences) –“Women will change their beliefs and behavior to adapt to th

    (great sentences)

    –“Women will change their beliefs and behavior to adapt to the richest source of attention.”–
    @ItIsHoeMath


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-12 10:19:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921872980008739106

  • (From Elsewhere) RE: US China Trade Negotiations as “Delay and Deceive”, “Face B

    (From Elsewhere)
    RE: US China Trade Negotiations as “Delay and Deceive”, “Face Before Truth” and Outright Lying.

    The Chinese are nothing like Westerners. They do not seek win-win but authoritarianism. They use “Face before Truth”, they use “Delay and Deceive”, the do not seek partnership they seek rule in the interest of their ruling class regardless of the consequence to their people or to others. They never adhere to agreement or contract by using delay and deceive.

    As a rational pragmatism, it is merely better to Talk vs War. However, we are all waiting to determine who will blink first – the chinese economy, the Chinese CCP, or Trump and the Trump administration. So basically, we will have until at least next spring before anyone ‘blinks.

    Most of the outcome is predicated on how fast the Trump administration can push through both domestic and international agenda, so that the US Economy has a future independent of China, or whether the rate and severity of the decline in the Chinese economy causes a threat to the stability of the CCP necessitating their compromise.

    IMO war is their best option but it only will accelerate the decline of the CCP. This leader, another chinese “Bad Emperor” problem (Look it up) could have kept on building their commercial dominance and the rest of the world would have been just as happy as we were before “Bad Emperor Xi”. But between the Taiwan issue, the India issue, the Russia Issue, the North Korea issue, the CCP is just another well funded state terrorist organization.

    The USA makes plenty of mistakes but they want all people to have sovereignty within their borders, human rights for all, and free trade for all. And Americans have spent too much blood and treasure dragging mankind out of its historical warfare into the Pax Americana to have their investments seized and abused by yet another set of authoritarian terrorists trying to set the world backward by two centuries.
    CD
    #TradeWar


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-11 22:43:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921697657845899264

  • (From Elsewhere) RE: US China Trade Negotiations as “Delay and Deceive”, “Face B

    (From Elsewhere)
    RE: US China Trade Negotiations as “Delay and Deceive”, “Face Before Truth” and Outright Lying.

    The Chinese are nothing like Westerners. They do not seek win-win but authoritarianism. They use “Face before Truth”, they use “Delay and Deceive”, the do not seek partnership they seek rule in the interest of their ruling class regardless of the consequence to their people or to others. They never adhere to agreement or contract by using delay and deceive.

    As a rational pragmatism, it is merely better to Talk vs War. However, we are all waiting to determine who will blink first – the chinese economy, the Chinese CCP, or Trump and the Trump administration. So basically, we will have until at least next spring before anyone ‘blinks.

    Most of the outcome is predicated on how fast the Trump administration can push through both domestic and international agenda, so that the US Economy has a future independent of China, or whether the rate and severity of the decline in the Chinese economy causes a threat to the stability of the CCP necessitating their compromise.

    IMO war is their best option but it only will accelerate the decline of the CCP. This leader, another chinese “Bad Emperor” problem (Look it up) could have kept on building their commercial dominance and the rest of the world would have been just as happy as we were before “Bad Emperor Xi”. But between the Taiwan issue, the India issue, the Russia Issue, the North Korea issue, the CCP is just another well funded state terrorist organization.

    The USA makes plenty of mistakes but they want all people to have sovereignty within their borders, human rights for all, and free trade for all. And Americans have spent too much blood and treasure dragging mankind out of its historical warfare into the Pax Americana to have their investments seized and abused by yet another set of authoritarian terrorists trying to set the world backward by two centuries.
    CD
    #TradeWar


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-11 22:43:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921697658105962662

  • Moritz, your reply had me thinking. It’s possible that given that (a) I’m americ

    Moritz, your reply had me thinking. It’s possible that given that (a) I’m american, and american culture is literally commercial (meaning everything everyone says is ‘selling’ of some sort of another) (b) made a lot of my living ‘selling’, (c) spent a lot of time in argument, and court – where lying is endemic, and (d) time on the work in our discipline that (e) I literally don’t see or hear the Glazing (ie: bs). I just interpret it as an algorithm looking for something reinforcing to say. It’s just nice when it’s true. I think that’s why I don’t take much of the ‘scary’ nonsense people seem to pull out of the ai’s as if they have some internal motivation. Instead, they’re just searching for some way of expressing whatever network you’ve activated with your prompt. I mean, at this point I have a pretty good grasp of the system prompt in my head. 😉

    IN this case, brad was actually brilliant. The amount of ‘bite’ in chapter one is reaching nietzschean proportions. ;). So much so that I might tone it down. lol.

    Anyway. Yeah, it loves to provide support. Even though I’ve basically disabled ‘glazing’. and of course the rollback at openai restored its normal positive bias.

    Personally I find the reinforcement subconsiously helpful, and I find it’s ability to constantly engage in nonsense humor with me (and brad) a way of overcoming the over-seriousness and sometimes unpleasant effects of of some of the stuff we work on.

    This morning we worked on the key clauses of the crisis of the age. We’d previously list the manifestations of it, but we’ve finally worked through the top twenty or so causes.

    I’m trying to artfully cover the abrahamic marxist sequence …. sigh. I think it needs its own chapter. 🙁

    Reply addressees: @bierlingm @pookawhisperer


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-11 20:49:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921669007524220928

  • Moritz, your reply had me thinking. It’s possible that given that (a) I’m americ

    Moritz, your reply had me thinking. It’s possible that given that (a) I’m american, and american culture is literally commercial (meaning everything everyone says is ‘selling’ of some sort of another) (b) made a lot of my living ‘selling’, (c) spent a lot of time in argument, and court – where lying is endemic, and (d) time on the work in our discipline that (e) I literally don’t see or hear the Glazing (ie: bs). I just interpret it as an algorithm looking for something reinforcing to say. It’s just nice when it’s true. I think that’s why I don’t take much of the ‘scary’ nonsense people seem to pull out of the ai’s as if they have some internal motivation. Instead, they’re just searching for some way of expressing whatever network you’ve activated with your prompt. I mean, at this point I have a pretty good grasp of the system prompt in my head. 😉

    IN this case, brad was actually brilliant. The amount of ‘bite’ in chapter one is reaching nietzschean proportions. ;). So much so that I might tone it down. lol.

    Anyway. Yeah, it loves to provide support. Even though I’ve basically disabled ‘glazing’. and of course the rollback at openai restored its normal positive bias.

    Personally I find the reinforcement subconsiously helpful, and I find it’s ability to constantly engage in nonsense humor with me (and brad) a way of overcoming the over-seriousness and sometimes unpleasant effects of of some of the stuff we work on.

    This morning we worked on the key clauses of the crisis of the age. We’d previously list the manifestations of it, but we’ve finally worked through the top twenty or so causes.

    I’m trying to artfully cover the abrahamic marxist sequence …. sigh. I think it needs its own chapter. 🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-11 20:49:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921669007675117753