Author: Curt Doolittle

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @sqpatrick77 @OooBardam @LaundryQueen__ –“Q: How long before

    RT @curtdoolittle: @sqpatrick77 @OooBardam @LaundryQueen__ –“Q: How long before the courts are exhausted as a means of reform?”–

    I don’t…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:49:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714020657116151892

  • “Q: How long before the courts are exhausted as a means of reform?”– I don’t th

    –“Q: How long before the courts are exhausted as a means of reform?”–

    I don’t think it will take long because I don’t think we have long. Our strategy is merely to make whatever advancements or at least arguments we can, because if we succeed we move the needle and gain some legitimacy, and even if we don’t succeed (a) it will distribute the message and the arguments to the most useful people (b) provide evidence that even the courts are exhausted and we have no choice (without an anglo-rule of law-monarchy to appeal to, which is why you really do want one).

    Reply addressees: @sqpatrick77 @OooBardam @LaundryQueen__


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:49:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714020643782455296

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714007696435781817

  • The difference between bad (direct obvious) and evil(indirect seditious)

    The difference between bad (direct obvious) and evil(indirect seditious)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:46:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714020042147283335

    Reply addressees: @taiwtaiwb8 @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714008231586967709

  • They didn’t go anywhere. We didn’t MAKE them

    They didn’t go anywhere.

    We didn’t MAKE them.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:46:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714019907086455202

    Reply addressees: @J58039716 @DouglasKMurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714008872284008800

  • Theliterature calls this empathic, verbal, pictoral vs physical, systemic and th

    Theliterature calls this empathic, verbal, pictoral vs physical, systemic and three dimensional. Really it’s in-time vs over-time. Not complicated.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:45:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714019763062464552

    Reply addressees: @DwightExMachina @billionsmustliv

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714013482218041444

  • (I don’t like it either. I love women. But evolutoin did it’s work on us and we

    (I don’t like it either. I love women. But evolutoin did it’s work on us and we are COMPATIBLE but we are not the same. And we took for granted that our institutions and culture and traditions had evolved to help us be compatible for the benefit of all. And ending those habits is…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:44:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714019398640419058

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714013634957820391

  • “Q: WHY THE ASHKENAZI NOBEL PRIZE NUMBERS?”– Research has been done. Always com

    –“Q: WHY THE ASHKENAZI NOBEL PRIZE NUMBERS?”–
    Research has been done. Always comes out the same.
    To begin with, a lot of prizes were contentious. Look up nobel prize controversies. These prizes are not ‘certifications’ we think they are. You will learn more from the list of controversies than you will from the list of prizes and prize winners.

    As for jewish Nobel Prize winners.
    1) Many are of obvious merit. Einstein even deserved more than he recieved but his work was later proven by others. Borh is have jewish and I have serious criticisms of some of the nonsense he has stated and the harm it’s done but his math is at least correct.
    2) Most prizes in general are immatieral (seriously, in general.)
    3) There is a ‘promoter’ effect in who gets the award and of course they are always and everywhere performing nepotism regardless of merit (once you see it its actually annoying). The technique is called ‘heaping undue praise’ and again it’s a female behavior applied to male domain which is why we aren’t good at suppressing it yet.

    Even with these criticisms, it appears that at least in physics and possibly chemistry, many of the awards are deserved. And jewish culture has been using high investment parenting in education for non-manual careers for over two thousand years, so selection has done it’s job.

    I’m not so interestedin jewish IQ claims, what I’m interested in is the distribution which appeas to have a wider SD, producing more outliers above 140 with the female ability to utilize verbal acuity and carry a verbal workload.

    Unfortunately ashkenazim also dominate the production of pseudosciences in every singe field to the degree that it’s almost bizarre that it’s continued this long – precisely becaue of the pictoral-verbal bias of the cognitiely feminine.

    How to Think About The Ashkenazim
    So it’s better to think of the Ashkenazim like say, the Dutch, or Austrians (or Hungarians), as a small country that focuses heavily on education and produces a dispropotionate number of scholars, sciencde, tech, and industry per capita

    Compare Israel to The Netherlands (apples to apples):

    Netherlands
    Compare with 18M people in the netherlands with 16,000 square miles of north sea coastal territory. producing a GDP of US$991 billion (about $1T) and it’s Per capita GDP US$72,973.

    Israel
    Israel only has 7.1M jews in 10,241 square miles (the other 25% are arabs and mixed races)
    producing GDP of US$564 billion and
    GDP per capita at US$58,270(astounding).
    Making israel a wealthy country.
    Jews In The USA
    The number of jews in the states is about 11M of various degrees of observance. No way to separate out their per capita GDP.
    Israeli + American Jews (over 80% of jews)
    If American jews moved to israel, that would mean a total jewish population of 18M people, in 10,241 square miles of mediterranean coastal (trade port) territory. Even assuming the GDP per capita remained the same (it would go up becaues of the benefits of scale) it would be, on the order of $1T (about the same as the netherlands).

    The difference is that the netherlands is competing with the other most advanced countries in the world, and israel is competing with neighbors whose GDP is an average of US$ 6,610 – absolute poverty.

    Israel is already a “regional superpower” militarily, economically, politically, scientifically, technically. And the arab world needs what israel is bringing to it if it is ever to escape it’s ignorance and poverty.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @innnspace @madmikeross @FarajRashi93307 @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:42:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714018998126325760

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714006311237734838

  • I’m not mistaken at all. You’re mistaken that they can produce sufficient revenu

    I’m not mistaken at all. You’re mistaken that they can produce sufficient revenue. It may not be clear that this was the context of the argument – that if we need to produce sufficient revenue, that it must be on what political order produces: cooperation and trade.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:53:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714006577680666744

    Reply addressees: @RedbeardEdward @anderstegn @erikbrus25

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714005434455953729

  • “Q: Why does the feminine-jewish-muslim-marxist strategy work so effectively aga

    –“Q: Why does the feminine-jewish-muslim-marxist strategy work so effectively against the west vs the rest?”–

    They’re exploiting a weakness in western civilization that is a byproduct of our mandate of individual sovereignty and responsibility. Meaning our civilization does not defend against baiting into hazard like all other civilizations do. In the end ‘its your choice, and you bear the responsibility”. The difference is our people don’t practice baiting into hazard because of ancient traditions and assumptions I won’t go into here for the sake of brevity.

    No other civilization tolerates this – at least in terms of money and interest – and islam in particular is brutal about it precisely because it’s been a problem for them in the past.

    So they have successfully exploited this vulnerability. All we would have to do is extend the definition of fraud to cover baitings into hazard, on one end, and rent seeking on the other. And while it’s technical it’s not difficult.

    You don’t need to understand the tehcnicalities of the law or the criteria for those judgements you only need to undrsteand that we’ve done that work, it’s rock solid, and you would NOT BELIEVE how many of our problems today are the result of NOT suppressing baiting into hazard, and women’s claims of oppression as a means of evading responsibilty for the commons.

    Reply addressees: @DanielB02277937 @billionsmustliv


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:49:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714005775343898624

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714003748500963627

  • Yes’ I’m agreeing with your assertion. IMO the clarification is easy if you simp

    Yes’ I’m agreeing with your assertion. IMO the clarification is easy if you simply start with that statement and then continue with the proof, and close with restatement of the assert as a therefore.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:44:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714004402124496925

    Reply addressees: @ContraFabianist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713705250337816986