Author: Curt Doolittle

  • There is opportunity for competition against it by the use of any other asset. T

    There is opportunity for competition against it by the use of any other asset. The question is why is that good for the population?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 16:02:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714310971701825657

    Reply addressees: @neoCamelist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714289222168035352

  • Doesn’t matter. What matters is the shortage of money as opportunity increases

    Doesn’t matter. What matters is the shortage of money as opportunity increases.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 16:01:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714310786342940824

    Reply addressees: @albin_dave @neoCamelist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714296006576341266

  • CORPORATIONS AND RETURNS –“Most corporations have a negative return on investme

    CORPORATIONS AND RETURNS
    –“Most corporations have a negative return on investment when adjusting for inflation.”– @henge_j

    Well, these things are true – in part. In fact, the hard part of any business is the multipliers you produce on inflation. Your corner gas station <1%, your grocery store 1%, half of the small businesses fail (but half of them don’t and if you want to become wealthy building a small business and selling it is the most reliable way to do so. The vast majority of deca-millionaires achieve wealth by this method of small business growth), most businesses meet or beat the rate of inflation when it’s ‘normal ‘ in the 3% range.

    But that doesn’t mean that the fundamental conflict between inflation and the shortage of money, and the capacity for state debt, isn’t the fundamental problem faced by all people in history. It only means that with just over a century of experience we haven’t fully separated the treasury from the government as we have the courts, and constrained governments from effectively buying votes or donors with the power of debt.

    Now, how do we do this without currency? We do it currently with oil markets.

    There is no escape from the game of maintaining monetary velocity to maintain purchasing power (value), while at the same time maximizing possible investments in speculative search for returns on investment, especially when returns on investment continue to increase in time horizon. This means that both military competitive investment at the top, infrastructure investment, education investment, and the spectrum of industrial to consumer investments at the bottom, are necessary at all times. And it also means, quite to the dismay of the financial, isurance, pension private sector, that they provide consumers no value that wouldn’t better be provided at national scale cutting out the middleman, and providing the treasury with income.

    Here are the round numbers at scale for the USA.

    EBITDA DEFINED
    EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It is a financial metric that measures a company’s profitability by calculating its earnings before accounting for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, taxes, and interest payments. This is the true measure of the profitability of a business from operations. The difference between EBITA and Net Profit is the cost of money and taxation.

    EBITDA Margin Ranges by Sector, High to Low
    Software & Services:
    High: 40-50%
    Average: 30-40%
    Low: 20-30%

    Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare:
    High: 35-45%
    Average: 25-35%
    Low: 15-25%

    Telecommunications:
    High: 35-45%
    Average: 25-35%
    Low: 15-25%

    Real Estate:
    High: 30-40%
    Average: 20-30%
    Low: 10-20%

    Consumer Goods:
    High: 25-35%
    Average: 20-30%
    Low: 10-20%

    Energy & Utilities:
    High: 20-30%
    Average: 15-25%
    Low: 5-15%

    Financial Services:
    High: 20-30%
    Average: 10-20%
    Low: 5-10%

    Manufacturing & Industrial:
    High: 20-30%
    Average: 10-20%
    Low: 5-10%

    Transport & Logistics:
    High: 15-25%
    Average: 10-15%
    Low: 5-10%

    Retail & Wholesale:
    High: 10-20%
    Average: 5-10%
    Low: 0-5%

    EXPLANATION BY SECTOR
    Public Companies
    Indices as Indicators: The long-term performance of stock market indices like the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ often outpace inflation. For instance, the average annual return for the S&P 500 has been around 10% before inflation since its inception.
    Dividend Yields: Some mature companies might not show a high rate of growth but offer dividends that, when considered as part of total ROI, can also outpace inflation.
    Blue Chips: Established companies with stable earnings, often called “blue chips,” usually have a long track record of beating inflation.
    Market Timing: Returns can also depend heavily on market timing. Buying during a downturn and selling during an upturn can beat inflation by a significant margin.

    Small Businesses
    Survival Rates: A significant number of small businesses fail within the first few years, offering negative ROI.
    Capital Efficiency: Some small businesses require less capital up-front and can generate ROI more quickly, making it easier to outpace inflation.
    Niche Markets: Small businesses serving niche markets often have a better chance of generating high ROI, provided the niche is profitable.

    Sector-Specific
    Tech & Innovation: Industries rooted in technology and innovation have generally shown strong growth and ROI, particularly in the 21st century.
    Traditional Industries: Sectors like manufacturing or utilities often offer moderate ROI but are usually stable.
    Cyclical Industries: Sectors like real estate or commodities can provide returns that either vastly outperform or underperform inflation, depending on economic cycles.

    Global Perspective
    Emerging Markets: Countries with rapidly growing economies can offer investment opportunities with ROIs that easily outpace inflation. However, these come with high risk.
    Currency Risks: Inflation must be considered not just for the country of the investment but also against any currency risk that might negate high ROI.

    Time Frame
    Short-Term: Due to market volatility, short-term ROI may not consistently beat inflation.
    Long-Term: Historically, long-term investments have a better chance of beating inflation, as markets tend to grow over time.

    Economic Conditions
    Boom Periods: In a robust economy, more companies will likely offer an ROI that outpaces inflation.
    Recessions: During economic downturns, fewer companies will likely beat inflation, and some might even offer negative ROI.

    Reply addressees: @henge_j


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 16:01:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714310598870134786

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714295243141480909

  • It’s very difficult to debate me on these issues. I don’t know anyone who can. (

    It’s very difficult to debate me on these issues. I don’t know anyone who can. (yes that’s a bit of bait so that we might discuss it for fun.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 15:32:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714303461712388141

    Reply addressees: @Alex70008182 @Breedlove22

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714302432048533932

  • THE PROBLEM: INFLATION VS SHORTAGE OF MONEY It’s not clear that inflation that d

    THE PROBLEM: INFLATION VS SHORTAGE OF MONEY

    It’s not clear that inflation that does not impact the production cycle (usually in months) is meaningful. It’s certainly clear that the central problem of pre-modern economies is the shortage of money. Even today, governments that cannot make use of fiat money as a debt instrument against future returns is at a severe disadvantage against those that can.

    So as in most things ‘libertarianism’ is middle class marxism – meaning a monoply one-class view of the world – instead of historical european Trifunctionalism of elites and Tripartism of the Classes where each class had obligations to one another, as do ranks in the military to which they were all de-facto members because of the need for militia given the territory, trade routes, ad difficulty in concentrating capital in territorial europe as well as the pontic steppe.

    Reply addressees: @albin_dave @neoCamelist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 15:31:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714303068613820416

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714296006576341266

  • “Q: Curt: Do women then even naturally desire children, or are they just a bypro

    –“Q: Curt: Do women then even naturally desire children, or are they just a byproduct?”–

    Summary
    A set of very simple neurological tweaks, in sequence, produce women’s care for children, but much less so their want of children.

    Learning
    Women who are raised with other children, especially younger children they care for, will tend to desire children. Some portion of women who have not will tend to favor hyperconsumption (selfishness) over child rearing. The reason is simple: women are biased to empathizing in time instead of male systematizing over time. ANd all brains like being stimulated by whatever means they are organized to recieve stimulation.

    Explanation
    The correct answer as far as we know, is that women desire sex, not children. Once they have children the hormones generally but not always do their job. Once the hormones do the job the gratification of attention and empathic exercise does it’s job. Once they develop skill at using attention and empathic exercise they discover they have real agency in the world (which is usually more of a male disposition). Once that is habituated most women find the stimulation of extending their nervous system over those of their children something akin to addictive. And that’s why they hold onto it even after children are gone – and some mothers are even a problem because of it. Meanwhile Kin selection and kin preference create a priority in both sexes – though oddly both men and women are more protective of children than they are of one another.

    Conclusion
    So nature brought about a sequence of incentives that together. In other words, sex drive, want of attention, empathizing and agency for stimulation take care of the process of ensuring our survival.
    Nature uses simple tools. It’s all it can use.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @RemttidAcul @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 14:47:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714292072453488640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714278990461214927

  • Libertarians and anarcho capitalists: Why do you presume to have some right to t

    Libertarians and anarcho capitalists: Why do you presume to have some right to the preservation of purchasing power of any asset of any type instead of normal market competition? Why do you presume you have some odd right to the constant value of commodity money, fiat money, money susbsitutes, debt instruments, interests in assets, or any other asset? To try to engineer that is just rent-seeking. If instead you’re purchasing power (asset) is invested and working at some sort of risk, then you aren’t engaging in rent-seeking.

    (if you don’t know what rent-seeking its then look it up.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 14:29:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714287642014281728

  • Gary, (audience), I am a devoted follower of yours, a former resident, business

    Gary, (audience),
    I am a devoted follower of yours, a former resident, business owner, and legal activist in Ukraine, who loves that country and the people as and often more than my own.

    The USA and the UK are naval and air powers, and as such, very, very, very good at logistical warfare. If USA intel says it’s time to use a given weapon it’s because their strategy of exhausting RU in every dimension is working. UA command does know this. And this is why UA command preserves every soldier and citizen they can. Because winning the war by exhaustion means an end to this conflict that is more likely to be permanent and the consequences for RU more systemic.

    Now that the RU command is afraid, and responding with attempts at concentration of forces, and now that severing what remains of RU logistics is possible, it means Crimea is far closer to the possibility of being retaken. At which time the regime is lost.

    It is very hard to watch people suffer and die. But generals must often choose how to tolerate the least harm in the short term because they cannot eliminate a far larger harm in the long term. We have not seen better generals than we have seen in UA in a very long time.

    I haven’t seen UA make a single mistake. And while I would like to complain about certain EU countries for their self congratulatory magical thinking that the age of imperial conflict is over, and that the EU, by virtue signaling alone, had somehow risen above war, I can’t see much fault in the US/UK strategy and response or dedication to the UA people, government,and leadership.

    It’s time for ATACMS. If used now, before winter, it should help not only counter the RU attempt to resist UA gains, but help UA reach the coastline so that those same weapons can reach both the strait and Sevastopol.

    The RU govt is still counting on winning an enduring conflict, because of european stresses and american internal conflict becaue of the plight of the ‘center’ and the success of the Race Marxists in undermining the civilization from within. However, this is another mistake. There is zero chance that americans will do anything other than support UA through to the end.

    Americans do not grasp that the world wars were an attempt to end the age of agrarian empires and usher in the age of federations of industrial and technological nation states. Unfortunately, americans withdraw from war at the earliest opportunity (a European way of war for historical reasons) when instead both MacArthur and Patton were correct. And so we are paying a higher cost of not completing the end of the age of empires than we would have if we had completing bringing about its end.

    And nothing has done more for the world in history than the anglo american postwar peace, free trade, human rights, and the suppression of wars of expansion and aggression. Or what we call the Bretton Woods Agreement.

    Cheers all.

    Reply addressees: @Kasparov63 @MaxBoot


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 14:24:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714286300956880896

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714279121361199344

  • Women who are raised with other children, especially younger children, will tend

    Women who are raised with other children, especially younger children, will tend to desire children. Some portion of women who have not will tend to favor hyperconsumption (selfishness) over child rearing.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 13:58:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714279633213120851

    Reply addressees: @RemttidAcul @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714278990461214927

  • Wrong scale. It saves you from their larger numbers and organizing against you.

    Wrong scale. It saves you from their larger numbers and organizing against you. It ensures that your economy will not be absolutely buried by those that have fiat money. It deprives savers from rent seeking on appreciation of money that does occur. And it deprives investors of…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 13:56:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714279115422159191

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714278217132232772