Author: Curt Doolittle

  • (Truthfully. I’m glad when ANYONE can grasp it. lol) -hugs

    (Truthfully. I’m glad when ANYONE can grasp it. lol)

    -hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 17:15:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717228290073940112

    Reply addressees: @Weltenfluss @FistedFoucault

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717210694104359158

  • OUR PEOPLE TAKE CARE OF EACH OTHER Doug asked me to share this give-send-go fund

    OUR PEOPLE TAKE CARE OF EACH OTHER
    Doug asked me to share this give-send-go fundraiser for a mother and baby whose devoted husband both to his family and our cause died unexpectedly.
    And they met their goal already.
    Because our people take care of each other.…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 17:14:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717228114189693177

  • Sorry Shane, I ‘might have missed the intent of your original question because i

    Sorry Shane, I ‘might have missed the intent of your original question because it was late and I was tired.

    I interpreted the term settlement in the legal sense of a resolution of differences.

    I think you mean settlement in the sense of homesteading.

    A settler is a general term for anyone. A homesteader satisfies legal criteria to invest in improving the capital value of the territory. So a settler is a higher standard of ‘demonstrated improvement in the asset’ than is a settler which just means you’re in the area for one reason or another.

    So the objective critiera is improvement of the territory by putting it to use for the betterment of the self directly and THE COMMONS INDIRECTLY.

    So i’m trying to discover a term that isn’t so fungible and easily misinterpreted, that, like homesteading implies the demand for capital improvement, but is more general rather than an analogy.

    EXPLANATION
    Both “settler” and “homesteader” refer to individuals who move to a new area to establish a residence, but the terms are used in different contexts and carry distinct legal and historical implications.

    Settler:
    General Term: “Settler” is a broader term that applies to anyone who relocates to a new area, often one that is relatively uninhabited or less developed, with the intent of establishing a permanent residence. Settlers can be part of larger colonization efforts, or they may be individuals or families seeking new opportunities.

    Land Ownership: The land that settlers occupy might be purchased, granted by a government, or sometimes seized from native populations. The land could also be part of a larger national or imperial strategy.

    Economic Activity: Settlers are not confined to any specific economic activity; they may engage in farming, trade, or any other livelihood.

    Legal Framework: Land acquisition by settlers is usually governed by the laws and regulations of the jurisdiction in which the land is located. This could range from formal land deeds to customary or traditional rights.

    Historical Context: The term is often used to describe individuals who were part of larger movements of population expansion, such as European settlers in the Americas, Africa, and Australia.

    Homesteader:
    Specific Term: “Homesteader” often refers specifically to individuals or families who acquire land through homesteading laws. In the United States, this is most famously represented by the Homestead Act of 1862.

    Land Ownership: Homesteaders usually acquire land by meeting certain conditions set by the government, such as building a dwelling and cultivating the land for a specified period. After meeting these conditions, they gain legal title to the property.

    Economic Activity: Homesteading often involves subsistence farming, at least initially. The primary purpose is usually agricultural development of the land.

    Legal Framework: Homesteading is typically regulated by specific laws that outline the conditions under which land can be claimed and ownership established.

    Historical Context: The term is often associated with westward expansion in the United States during the 19th and early 20th centuries, but it also applies in other contexts where similar land-grant systems exist.

    Comparison:
    Scope: All homesteaders are settlers, but not all settlers are homesteaders.

    Land Acquisition: Homesteaders usually acquire land through specific legal frameworks that require them to fulfill certain conditions. Settlers may acquire land through a variety of means.

    Intent: Both aim to establish a permanent residence, but homesteaders usually have more specific legal and agricultural obligations to meet.

    Economic Activity: Homesteaders are usually more focused on agricultural development, at least initially, while settlers have a broader range of economic activities.

    By understanding these distinctions, one gains a clearer conceptual grasp of land acquisition and settlement practices, particularly in contexts where legal and historical factors play a significant role.

    Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 17:09:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717226923498049536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717212596841894232

  • I don’t mean to underplay it, I mean only to state that the cause of the destruc

    I don’t mean to underplay it, I mean only to state that the cause of the destruction of the family is women and their succeptibility to the magical thinking of the left’s neo-marxist(cultural marxism), postmodern (truth marxism), anti-male-anti-family-feminist, race-marxist…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 16:58:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717224034016936336

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717223341436670029

  • I was wondering if someone was gonna go there. Now (assuming you’ve watched my v

    I was wondering if someone was gonna go there.

    Now (assuming you’ve watched my video on Ancestral Lands), what do you do when the people who were the philistines integrate into the local culture and eventually disappear into it?

    1) Genetics
    2) History

    TLDR; the jews are an admixture of various regional ethnic arabs with some fragment of European Philistine component that I have a vague memory of being small.(I’m not willing to go search for it)

    In other words, The jews of the levant had a minor european component, and the ashkenazi are at least half eurpean if not more so.

    Genetic Studies:
    Ancient DNA: Recent advances in the field of ancient DNA (aDNA) have begun to shed light on the genetic makeup of the Philistines. For instance, a 2019 study that examined remains from a Philistine burial site in Ashkelon suggested that they did have a European ancestry, confirming theories about their Aegean origins. However, the study also showed that this genetic signature began to fade in subsequent generations, indicating intermarriage with local populations.

    Local Integration: Given the evidence of assimilation and intermarriage, it’s plausible that some genetic markers of the Philistines could be diffused into the broader population of the Levant. However, identifying these markers in modern populations would be a complex task given the multiple layers of migration and mixing that the region has witnessed.

    Genetic Admixture: The Levant has been a crossroads for various civilizations, leading to a complex genetic tapestry. Disentangling the specific contributions of the Philistines to this mix would be challenging.

    Philistine History
    The Philistines were a people of Aegean origin who settled on the southern coast of ancient Canaan, now modern-day Israel and the Gaza Strip, around the 12th century BCE. They are most famous for their conflicts with the Israelites, as recorded in the Hebrew Bible.

    Decline and Assimilation:
    Assyrian and Babylonian Invasions: During the 8th and 7th centuries BCE, the Assyrians exerted control over Philistine cities. Later, the Babylonians also invaded the region. These invasions led to a decline in Philistine political autonomy.

    Cultural Assimilation: Over time, the distinctiveness of the Philistine culture became increasingly diluted. They adopted local languages and customs, which suggests a level of assimilation into the surrounding cultures.

    Absorption into Neo-Babylonian and Persian Empires: After the fall of the Assyrian Empire, the Philistine cities were absorbed into the Neo-Babylonian Empire and later the Persian Empire.

    Hellenistic Influence: Following the conquests of Alexander the Great, the Levant, including the Philistine territories, came under heavy Hellenistic influence, further accelerating their cultural assimilation.

    Roman Rule: Eventually, the area came under Roman rule. By this time, the Philistines as a distinct people had largely disappeared, absorbed into the broader cultural and ethnic milieu.

    Religious Transformation: With the spread of monotheistic religions like Judaism and later Christianity and Islam, the polytheistic religious practices of the Philistines likely faded away.

    Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @Obediencio1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 16:56:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717223526678077441

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717214476267593958

  • RT @FernandoGLV1212: For some reason @curtdoolittle And @whatifalthist @jordanbp

    RT @FernandoGLV1212: For some reason @curtdoolittle And @whatifalthist @jordanbpeterson Come to mind.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 16:48:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717221653711646744

  • Ingvar, We must expect, that as awareness of our work increases (and it will sta

    Ingvar,
    We must expect, that as awareness of our work increases (and it will start increasing faster over the next year given our events, talks, and publication), that the mentally challenged whether in intelligence, personality or both, will crawl out of the woodwork, looking for attention, by trying to criticize the truth, in order to advance whatever twisted, dysfunctional, absurd fantasy they wish to demand of the world that has so far rejected them sexually, socially, economically, and politically.

    But yes, if it’s worthy of response I’ll respond. 😉

    Reply addressees: @Weltenfluss @FistedFoucault


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 15:38:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717203959209709568

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717202507129147547

  • Gerçek gerçektir. Eğer hakikati inkar ederseniz, doğruyu söyleyenlerle alay edip

    Gerçek gerçektir. Eğer hakikati inkar ederseniz, doğruyu söyleyenlerle alay edip onları eleştirirseniz, o zaman yalancısınız, hırsızsınız, halk ve insanlık düşmanısınız.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 15:25:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717200817801797728

    Reply addressees: @T_OMER_T @OMTyme2Shine @jacksonhinklle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717180960406380702

  • determining ownership

    determining ownership.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 12:13:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717152507468624287

    Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717145045193687435

  • (humor) Today, I brought the whole staff at the bank Starbucks Rice crispy treat

    (humor)
    Today, I brought the whole staff at the bank Starbucks Rice crispy treats. 😉 (I love TD Bank). No hugs. But lots of smiles.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 03:48:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717025334791438710