Author: Curt Doolittle

  • “…. democratic politics tends to concentrate benefits and disperse costs, so t

    “…. democratic politics tends to concentrate benefits and disperse costs, so that politicians in both parties face very strong incentives to promise current and future benefits without regard to the costs of those promises.

    Boettke. Hoppe by less antagonistic means. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 10:39:00 UTC

  • DOOLITTLE’S FACEBOOK MARKDOWN LANGUAGE Use the HIGHLIGHT flag for THOUGHT pieces

    DOOLITTLE’S FACEBOOK MARKDOWN LANGUAGE

    Use the HIGHLIGHT flag for THOUGHT pieces, and for silly stuff – don’t.

    USE ALL CAPS FOR TITLES

    (lower case parenthesis for tags)

    _Underscore For Book Titles_

    “Quotes For Article Titles”

    RE:”…for quoting comments…”

    —For block quotes—

    **for emphasis of an idea in a sentence**

    And INLINE ALL CAPS for key TERMS that can be visually scanned.

    And use … when you’ve cut from a quote,

    And [when you] have replaced words in a quote for clarity.

    STYLE

    My preference is for Oxford commas because my long sentences require clarity, so “a, b, and c” is preferable to a, b and c.

    There is a big difference between comma , semicolon ; and period.

    Your vocabulary should suit your audience. But that requires a lot of verbose, and imprecise language that is very easy to misinterpret.

    NOTE TO SELF: OPEN PERSONAL ISSUES IN WRITING

    (I am generally trying to convey a different causal sequence or emphasis on causal properties than we do in normal language. It is this articulation of causal dimensions that people find illuminating in my work. But it makes for very long sentences. I’ve found that over time, just through repetition I can usually simplify it down. And then when I use that chain of causes, repeatedly, people begin to grasp it fairly easily, with the same repetition. Hayek is very, very good at this problem and I struggle to emulate him whenever possible. There is a certain verbal tempo to his work, and that tempo facilitates articulating multiple causal axis while retaining comprehensibility. My short term memory is not as good as his was, and I do not necessarily think in words in the first place, so it is harder for me to construct sentences as well, but I work at it. )

    (My vocabulary, despite all my work at it, still scores as largely academic. But honestly I can’t take it down any further. I have to work on sentence structure and the organization of concepts instead. And that seems to be working if I just keep at it.)

    (Unfortunately, again, my programming history is a little closer to how I think, and reinforced my thinking, and was terribly damaging to my writing, which is a blend of spoken word and programmatic argument. So I tend to use periods, not as verbal cues, but as “end-concept” markers. And I should use more semicolons, and more periods, and shorter sentences. And I’m having a problem breaking those tendencies. Partly because I type at something like 100wpm, and don’t think about it. )


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 10:24:00 UTC

  • (personal) Never realized that my aversion to conflict, which drives my interest

    (personal)

    Never realized that my aversion to conflict, which drives my interest in politics and political economy, was part of of the Aspie-thing, rather than just a reaction to how my father treated my mother and us. I feel that I have to protect everyone (its terrible really) and that I just wish conflict would end so that I didn’t have to. Aspies particularly don’t understand interpersonal, emotional conflict. It’s very distressing. It’s incomprehensible. And we don’t like things that are incomprehensible. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 09:58:00 UTC

  • ON DIVERSITY When I use the term ‘diversity’, I am not terribly concerned with r

    ON DIVERSITY

    When I use the term ‘diversity’, I am not terribly concerned with race. I am concerned with culture: institutions, myths, traditions, habits, norms, metaphysical value judgement unstated but universal to the traditions.

    I care only about race in the senses that (a) people vote as racial blocs, and (b) people are less re-distributive with genetic distance. and (c) Racial groups tend (in the lower classes) to value in-group signals more that out-group signals, and sometimes intentionally so (keep ’em in strategy). Some cultures have very strong normative rules and do a better job of inclusion than we do. Some cultures and races are better at integrating that others. (None of us care too much about east Asian Americans).

    I care mostly about conflict and the distraction and expense of conflict over power, access to power, privilege, status signals, and opportunity. I would much prefer that we lived under a constitutional monarchy where we could live in our own little tribal villages, with our own laws, and the monarch was only interested in generating revenue for himself by getting us to trade and cooperate. And where we have no access to power, so the ONLY POWER we can exercise is in the market. This worked extremely well for Austrian Jews for example. And I’d prefer it worked extremely well for all of us.

    Diversity works. But diverse desire for control of others does not.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 09:44:00 UTC

  • pretty public about the fact that I think Boettke is our best. So this is a sham

    http://www.economicthought.net/blog/?p=5163I’m pretty public about the fact that I think Boettke is our best. So this is a shameless plug of the failure of the mainstream to understand Hayek’s contribution. Prices and knowledge are making a slow comeback. Specifically that prices DISTORT knowledge accumulation, not just incentives, and that this process accumulates and is expressed in our theory of the business cycle.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 09:28:00 UTC

  • a profession that earns its salary teaching MBA students could ask for no better

    http://johnhcochrane.blogspot.kr/2013/10/gene-famas-nobel.html” a profession that earns its salary teaching MBA students could ask for no better result than to find that better knowledge and training lead to better investment management. Too bad the facts say otherwise.”


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 09:25:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://reason.com/reasontv/2013/10/15/economics-teaches-us-humility-qa-with-au


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 09:23:00 UTC

  • WHY IS POLITICAL ECONOMY ONCE AGAIN CENTER STAGE, WHILE MONETARY AND FISCAL POLI

    WHY IS POLITICAL ECONOMY ONCE AGAIN CENTER STAGE, WHILE MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICY CLAIM LESS ATTENTION?

    Because it’s become obvious that democracy, permanent growth, equality, diversity, and the end of political innovation were false assumptions.

    Tribalism has, does, and will always rule.

    Perhaps academia should focus more on institutions of cooperation rather than optimum choices for all.

    MONOPOLY IS A BAD IDEA EVERYWHERE IN NATURE THAT WE FIND IT.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 08:57:00 UTC

  • “THE CULTURE OF PREVENTION” : WESTERN POSITIVISM : THE SIX RULES OF PREVENTION :

    “THE CULTURE OF PREVENTION” : WESTERN POSITIVISM : THE SIX RULES OF PREVENTION : THE SYSTEMATIC WESTERN ADOPTION OF JEWISH OBSCURANTISM

    (insight)

    The interesting thing about western culture, is the underlying assumption that we can CHANGE THE WORLD to suit our desires. It’s a POSITIVE outlook on life. Life isn’t suffering or difficult. Its an opportunity for heroisim and GLORY. “The purpose of life is to bend nature to our will, such that we leave the world better for having lived in it.”

    Think about the rest of the world’s “golden rule” and the anglo saxon “silver rule”. While they say “do unto others” we say “do not do unto others, that which you would not have done unto you.” The implied sovereignty in the Anglo Silver Rule is quite different from the slavish peasantry implied in the Golden Rule.

    WESTERN CIV is the culture of PREVENTION, under the ASSUMPTION that we can achieve our desires if no external entity PREVENTS IT. So our goal is to let everyone pursue their desires, and for us to pursue our mutual desires, and to PREVENT anyone from impeding that process. Nature is beautiful for this reason, as is man, as is life. Because it is not a struggle for the opportunity to pursue one’s fancy, it is a struggle only to prevent those from preventing us from pursuing our fancies.

    This is much more English a vision than the German vision of accomplishing the same thru duty.

    THE MAGIC LAWS OF THE CULTURE OF PREVENTION

    1) PREVENT THE USE OF POWER : DECENTRALIZATION, BALANCE OF FORCES, COMPETITION, MILITIA, SOVEREIGNTY

    2) PREVENT VIOLENCE THEFT AND FREE RIDING : PRIVATE PROPERTY AND COMMON LAW, RIGOROUS NORMS

    3) PREVENT LOSS OF CAPITAL : FORCE ALL CONFLICT INTO THE MARKET WHERE IT PRODUCES CAPITAL RATHER THAN DESTROYS IT

    4) PREVENT THE IMMORAL SOCIETY OF THE EXTENDED FAMILY : NUCLEAR FAMILY AND PRIVATE PROPERTY

    5) PREVENT CONQUEST BY SUPERIOR FORCES : RELY ON TECHNOLOGY, PROFESSIONAL WARRIORS, AND THE MILITIA, TO MAKE USE OF INFERIOR NUMBERS AND WEALTH.

    6) PREVENT FRAUD BY OBSCURANTISM : TRUTH, SCIENCE, AND OPERATIONAL LANGUAGE

    THE CULTURE THAT DECRIES HUBRIS

    Greek mythology would only be created by a people who had such confidence that their warning would be a universal caution against any incidence of hubris. It is the mythology of a cautious, conservative, but confident people. The same is true for Germanic mythology. Albeit Christianity tries desperately to tame it by directing it to positive uses. The church could not defend against the Normans so they directed them to fighting the crusades. Not that the crusades were not a good use of men. But that it gave vent to the warrior ethos. Chivalric codes did the rest by allowing warriors, or those who could not afford to be, or those not able to be, to demonstrate heroism through service.

    ON THE WESTERN ADOPTION OF JEWISH OBSCURANTISM

    Unfortunately Jewish culture has mastered the art of obscurantism, pseudo-rationality and pseudo-science, as a means of undermining land-holder moral and social codes, and we have failed to convert them to our aristocratic doctrine. Or we had succeeded prior to the second world war, when American Jewry and Scotts Presbyterians were indistinguishable from one another, and both doing our civilization justice. Since them, we have legions of westerners in university settings doing the same, since Freud, Marx, Cantor gave birth to the Bolsheviks, the Frankfurt School and the Postmodernists took control of the university in an effort to claim for themselves what had previously been the social power of the church.

    Thought leadership in obscurantism has, since then, become a western profession thanks to Kant, Heidegger, Rorty, Adorno, Foucault. Rawls tried to resurrect it with his Victorian parlor trick, and Hayek alone could not hold them back, because he confused psychology with the necessity of calculation and did not yet have the analogy of computer science to help him solve the problem as we propertarians have.

    Mises and Rothbard took us again, into another Jewish pseudo-science, which Hoppe partly rescued us from, and which I’m trying to rescue us from entirely.

    But the real heavy lifting has been done, as always in the west, by empirical scientists in the Anglo tradition, leaving the rationalists in the continental tradition, once again, searching for some form of obscurantism to justify their tyrannical appropriation from the masses, and the meritocratic natural aristocracy that would arise without their predation on them by means of force of government, and various modes of obscurantist language.

    Meanwhile at home, as means of resisting the state, the religious right uses a time honored form of obscurantism themselves to save their society from conquest by the predatory state bureaucracy.

    OBSCURANT LANGUAGE IS IMMORAL BECAUSE IT IS FRAUD. IF YOU CANNOT DESCRIBE IT IN THE LANGUAGE OF ACTION (AS OPERATIONS) THEN YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND IT. IF YOU USE OBSCURANT LANGUAGE YOU ARE LYING, WHETHER YOU UNDERSTAND IT OPERATIONALLY OR NOT.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 08:39:00 UTC

  • “INEQUALITY IS THE PRICE OF DIVERSITY” Now some people have tried to argue other

    “INEQUALITY IS THE PRICE OF DIVERSITY”

    Now some people have tried to argue otherwise, but they confuse the market with the political and normative. AGGREGATES ARE DECEPTIONS. Aggregates launder causality.Causality in human affairs consists of people following incentives in real time, where those incentives are, at any moment, more or less probable. And people are quite simple following their incentives:

    INCENTIVE SELECTION

    1) The Greatest Reward

    2) In the shortest time.

    3) At the least effort.

    4) At the lowest risk.

    5) With the greatest certainty.

    ANOTHER PROPERTARIAN LESSON : CLEARING THE NETWORK OF PREFERENCES

    People do not order their preferences. The evaluate the weights of any action in CLEARING a set of preferences. They evaluate the set of any actions in clearing further preferences.

    ANOTHER PROPERTARIAN LESSON : THE STATUS ECONOMY

    1) Status is the human economy, and money is just a vehicle for it.

    2) Loss aversion for status is higher than any other loss aversion other than life, limb and offspring. Money isn’t as important as status. Status gets one access to opportunity.

    3) STATUS SIGNALS in group are CHEAPER to get an maintain than status signals across groups.

    That last bit is why diversity doesn’t work.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 07:44:00 UTC