You know, our culture, our protestant culture, tells you to suppress all shortcuts and produce for yourself and the group. That is a very hard norm to create, and a very easy norm to undermine.
If you sell ‘you can cheat this way’ you can make a profit at it.
They did.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 07:24:00 UTC
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10548629/US-Marines-postpone-fitness-rule-after-most-female-recruits-fail-to-do-three-pull-ups.htmlISRAEL FORBIDS WOMEN IN COMBAT
—“Israel just forbade women in combat, but don’t expect much wailing on the part of the press. On the other hand, were we to do it…”—
Duh. All it does is get men killed.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 06:20:00 UTC
OPEN BORDERS = ANTI FREE MARKET
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 05:42:00 UTC
IN OUR QUEST FOR POWER WE GAVE POWER TO EVERYONE ELSE
We didn’t realize, that when we we started the enlightenment, that our appeal to universalism, which allowed us to collect the numbers needed to seize power from the aristocracy, that we were by consequence, also advocating that non-family members to use the same arguments to conquer us.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 05:39:00 UTC
APPLE PRODUCT SACRILEGE!
V, having her lunch, just cracked a hard boiled egg on her 11″ Macbook Air.
And grinned at me afterward.
Sigh. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 05:35:00 UTC
http://jaymans.wordpress.com/2014/07/28/idiocracy-can-wait/AMERICAN DYSGENIA : BIRTH RATES
Small things in large numbers have vast consequences. Would you rather keep a 106IQ economy employed or a 90IQ economy employed? At what point do you not have enough people to voluntarily organize production in relation to those who can only participate in production, to those who cannot participate in production?
You can’t use 20th century history as a benchmark, unless you include the rest of the world’s poverty, ignorance, and backwardness in you analysis. Because labor pools are rebalancing and they will continue to. And the upper class won’t be those people that hold land. It will be those people who are employable in the organization of production.
Now, in Propertarianism I have an answer for this problem, but only if we limit dysgenic reproduction to one child. Otherwise, in the end, we still lose.
Because there has to be a reason for a minority to organize production.
Let that sink in a bit.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 04:55:00 UTC
http://www.chron.com/news/local/article/Photos-show-border-militias-moving-across-Texas-5647487.phpTHEY NEED MORAL AUTHORITY, AND A PLAN. WE ALREADY HAVE THE NUMBERS
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 04:23:00 UTC
NEXT PROBLEM TO SOLVE: TABLE OF COMPARATIVE TRUTH
So, now I have to work on comparative “truth” in each civilization, by revisiting huntington and Fukuyama. But today, I’m spending the day with Macdonald again. Because while he has outlined the jewish strategy, I still must outline the anglo, german, and maybe islamic and Chinese strategies. I’d originally intended to tell the tale of the English, German and Jewish ‘cities’ but maybe I have to broaden it?
Or do I just focus on the three important to the west, and give light treatment to the others. Strangely, because I studied chinese history in College, and because its an almost entirely military culture, I understand the Chinese strategy pretty clearly. Islam is fairly easy because it consists so thoroughly of a limited set of principles, tribalism, and inbreeding. I guess, german is the most simple. Because duty is not a hard concept to get across. It’s also martial.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 04:15:00 UTC
NO ONE LOVES A SLAYER OF GODS
(lament)(stat of affairs)
You know, I’m slaying my own gods. Which, I don’t think other people appreciate. 🙂
It takes a lot of guts to slay your own gods. What are you left with, when you have slain them? Yourself.
But you cannot say you pursue truth if you are not wiling to slay your gods if they are false gods. You merely pursue comfort or confirmation. Not truth.
So we have now Mises, Rothbard and Popper – all of whom are half right and half tragically wrong because of their use of pseudoscience and verbalism to attempt to expand the cosmopolitan social norms of the insular ghetto to the rest of the world. Just as we white folk have tried to apply northern european high trust norms to the rest of the world. Just as the Muslims wish to. Just as the Germans tried to.
But you see, democracy is itself a folly, while truth telling, property rights, the common law, and the militial guarantee of property rights and the common law, have allowed us the luxury of limited democracy in the past. And we tried to export democracy rather than truth telling, property rights, the common law, and militial guarantee of property rights and the common law.
But worse, the jewish system failed them. They have been murdered and persecuted for their system, and nearly eradicated outside of Europe, and only not eradicated in Europe because of anglos.
So Huntington’s clash of civilizations, and Kotin’s tribes turn out to be a fairly accurate description of the state of the world. We have tried the enlightenment (anglo) model, and while science has succeeded, democracy has failed. We have tried the french model and it is currently failing catastrophically. We have tried the jewish model and it has been an unmitigated disaster for the west. We have tried the german model, and we crushed it.
The enlightenment political ambition – the promise of universalism – has been a catastrophic failure everywhere we have taken it.
It may not be clear to the people who follow me yet, but the highest correspondence between human institutions, truth, science, and therefore correspondence with reality. is constructed by truth, property, the common law, and scientific inquiry. And truth is only desirable to a minority of peoples. For most, truth, and therefore, property, liberty, are only available to a minority of peoples.
Universalism is done unless it is conducted at the lowest common denominator.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 03:45:00 UTC
WHY ATTACK THE MISESIAN/ROTHBARDIANS?
(aside from that it’s fun?)(aside from that they’re immoral?) (aside from pseudoscience?)
Restore liberty, libertarianism, classical liberalism, to its aristocratic origins: the brotherhood of property rights, the militia, and insurance of each other’s property by the promise of violence if it is abridged.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-29 02:18:00 UTC