DYSGENIA : BIRTH RATES Small things in large numbers have vast consequences. Wou

http://jaymans.wordpress.com/2014/07/28/idiocracy-can-wait/AMERICAN DYSGENIA : BIRTH RATES

Small things in large numbers have vast consequences. Would you rather keep a 106IQ economy employed or a 90IQ economy employed? At what point do you not have enough people to voluntarily organize production in relation to those who can only participate in production, to those who cannot participate in production?

You can’t use 20th century history as a benchmark, unless you include the rest of the world’s poverty, ignorance, and backwardness in you analysis. Because labor pools are rebalancing and they will continue to. And the upper class won’t be those people that hold land. It will be those people who are employable in the organization of production.

Now, in Propertarianism I have an answer for this problem, but only if we limit dysgenic reproduction to one child. Otherwise, in the end, we still lose.

Because there has to be a reason for a minority to organize production.

Let that sink in a bit.