The purpose of Propertarian political institutions is permissive: to create a market for commons by abandoning majority assent.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:13:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637598991241347072
The purpose of Propertarian political institutions is permissive: to create a market for commons by abandoning majority assent.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:13:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637598991241347072
Any advance in political order must improve the ability of increasingly disparate groups to construct mutually beneficial commons.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:12:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637598614508994560
OK. I will try to squeeze that into my list somewhere. Thanks for the advice.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 11:51:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637593309083496448
Reply addressees: @Outsideness @ne0colonial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637580706156146688
IN REPLY TO:
@Outsideness
@curtdoolittle @ne0colonial A compact argument against NeoCam would be far more valuable than a diffuse positioning viz ‘NRx’.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637580706156146688
I cannot offer meaningful comment on that post. Sorry.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 11:50:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637593077721497600
Reply addressees: @soapjackal @Outsideness @ne0colonial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637571328866779136
IN REPLY TO:
@soapjackal
@curtdoolittle @Outsideness @ne0colonial the continental takes it to new heights http://t.co/iRKb40GlT2
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637571328866779136
I can’t really respond to this kind of argument on twitter, but the neo-cam model does not solve the problem. no.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 10:09:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637567631713767424
Reply addressees: @Outsideness @ne0colonial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637269413306064896
IN REPLY TO:
@Outsideness
@ne0colonial @curtdoolittle In the NeoCam model, all incentives to resolve collective action problems are based on SovCorp property values.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637269413306064896
Legal dissent is is useful only in prohibiting the construction of a voluntary commons if it imposes costs upon the extant assets of others.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 08:15:00 UTC
Majority Assent is helpful in the allocation of scarce resources to prioritized ends.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 08:14:00 UTC
The purpose of Propertarian political institutions is permissive: to create a market for commons by abandoning majority assent.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 08:13:00 UTC
Any advance in political order must improve the ability of increasingly disparate groups to construct mutually beneficial commons.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 08:12:00 UTC
https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2015/08/13/asabiyyah-2/”AS A RULE, THE ENGLISH ARE NOT FAMILY ORIENTED PEOPLE”
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 05:23:00 UTC