Author: Curt Doolittle

  • CAUSE OF SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR BEHAVIOR? The cause of Social Justice Warrior Be

    http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1snc7ft?new_post=trueTHE CAUSE OF SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR BEHAVIOR?

    The cause of Social Justice Warrior Behaviour?

    http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1snc7ft?

    I will SIMPLIFY it: (Rallying and Shaming by Betas against Alphas)

    (a) women gossip in favor of their reproductive strategy.

    (b) we enfranchised women without limiting their ability to gossip (lie).

    (c) we all negotiate on behalf of our reproductives strategies.

    (d) We perceive the world biased by our reproductives strategies.

    (e) female/consume/short, libertarian/produce/medium, conservative/save/long.

    (f) Voluntary exchange is the only means of ‘calculating’ across all three biases.

    (g) Monopoly democracy makes it impossible for us to trade across the biases.

    (h) therefore democracy with female participation is dis-utilitarian.

    (i) and we need to construct a government of bias-exchanges, not majority assent.

    CLOSING

    Parsimony (Occam’s Razor) asks us to falsify this argument. I think we can’t.

    Once you realize they’re just gossiping in order to steal from you it’s simple. Hard to get more ‘simple’ than that.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-31 08:02:00 UTC

  • SIMON WREN LEWIS ON REFORMING MACRO (continuing the mathiness debate)

    SIMON WREN LEWIS ON REFORMING MACRO

    (continuing the mathiness debate)

    http://mainlymacro.blogspot.com/2015/08/reform-and-revolution-in-macroeconomics.html


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-30 11:41:00 UTC

  • AM NOT SO SURE. PROSPERITY DECREASES RISK, AND DECREASES INCENTIVES TO CHEAT. IT

    http://www.voxeu.org/article/economic-prosperity-breeds-trustI AM NOT SO SURE. PROSPERITY DECREASES RISK, AND DECREASES INCENTIVES TO CHEAT. IT DOES NOT BREED TRUST


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-30 10:34:00 UTC

  • Fiorina on business and economy. Although I’d still prefer Trump on Immigration,

    Fiorina on business and economy. Although I’d still prefer Trump on Immigration, trade negotiations and anti-establishment.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-30 08:00:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637897563077758976

    Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/636934934733570050


    IN REPLY TO:

    @FriedrichHayek

    I’m officially backing Carly Fiorina for President. Rubio is now my VP choice. We need someone who can throw punches https://t.co/4fhX0w5qVV

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/636934934733570050

  • REVIEWING LAST SIX YEARS OF PROGRESS ON PROPERTARIANISM My first draft in 2006,

    REVIEWING LAST SIX YEARS OF PROGRESS ON PROPERTARIANISM

    My first draft in 2006, in retrospect, is almost embarrassing. My second draft in 2010, was fairly complete, but when I got to the section where I requried truth telling in government, I’d focused on ‘calculability’ and ‘traceabilty’ as means of preventing abuses of funds, and abuses of the law. My third draft in 2013 still had me stuck with the same problem. I had no idea at the time, that six years of work later, I would have taken that early intuition and turned it into Operationalism as a test not only of truthfulness but of existential possibility. It was another year before I made it through truth. And another year to develop the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowedge, labor and advocacy resulting in the market for commons..

    And while I was pretty sure in 2009 that the solution to government was a market, and I knew strict construction was required, I did not know the philosophical basis for it. I knew that moral intuitions were reducible to property rights, and that variations in moral intuitions reflected the property rights necessary for each reproductive bias.

    But from today’s vantage point I’ve come very far in the ability to articulate these ideas as necessary, and I am certainly better at communicating them, the fact of the matter is that most of what I have done is improve explanation of why such things are true and necessary. But the original understanding that the solution to the deceit of the 20th century, as the second attempt at mysticism of the west, was truth telling, and that we had to create a market for commons to accommodate the emerging heterogeneous interests of any polity with any sufficiently complex division of perception, cognition, labor and advocacy.

    I did not expect to end up advocating Eugenic reproduction. I did not expect the racial differences to be (largely) rates of suppression of the underclasses. I did not expect to come out so strongly in favor of the family. I did not expect to demand a revolution. I viewed my work as libertarian and institutionally progressive yet it is the right that finds my work most interesting (because it proves that their intuitions are correct.)

    So I will finish The Politics this year, and possibly aesthetics. That means I will write up draft constitutions for various forms of propertarian political orders (honest and truthful regardless of whether collective or libertarian).

    A few people have asked me to address what I will call personal philosophy, even if I view my work as political and that inspiration is not my job – that’s positivist. My job is preventing deceit and error. So maybe I will do that or not.

    I will also deal with the DARK SUBJECTS: revolution, and war. But I do not want to do that until last. So that I think will be next year.

    Hopefully in time for the election. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-30 06:51:00 UTC

  • LITERARY GENERATIONS – THE TECHNO MYTHOS I wasn’t really aware of how much I was

    LITERARY GENERATIONS – THE TECHNO MYTHOS

    I wasn’t really aware of how much I was affect ed by Heinlein, Asimov, Clarke, Elison, Bova, and Herbert during the 60’s and early 70’s. I was very much aware of how I was affected by Girard and the Heavy Metal movement, Alien and Blade Runner in the late 70’s and turn of the 80’s (star wars re-americanized and made ‘cute’ sf and that wasn’t my gig). Then even more aware of the influence of Gibson, Sterling, and Stephenson in the 80’s and 90’s – a grungier vision of the future. I haven’t been affected by any author much since then. In fact, it’s hard to read much sci fi, if not all fiction now. The zeitgeist at present is one of conquest by immigrants and ‘the fall’ represented by the pervasiveness of the zombie genre. So we are all buried in a decay narrative now. Optimism seems impossible, so we won’t buy it in our literature. At least the Nuclear Holocaust era gave us post-apocalyptic hope for renewal. This one is a hopeless mythos.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-30 04:19:00 UTC

  • And german philosophers … they, well, should find something else to do. :-0 Li

    And german philosophers … they, well, should find something else to do. :-0 Like Gardening.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:38:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637605213269008384

    Reply addressees: @soapjackal @Outsideness @ne0colonial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637602426585878528


    IN REPLY TO:

    @soapjackal

    @curtdoolittle @Outsideness @ne0colonial Thats understandable. Its important to learn the lesson of the german Cameralists regardless.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637602426585878528

  • Well you are probably better informed about them. I work with institutions more

    Well you are probably better informed about them. I work with institutions more so than rhetoric.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:37:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637605078766067712

    Reply addressees: @soapjackal @Outsideness @ne0colonial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637602426585878528


    IN REPLY TO:

    @soapjackal

    @curtdoolittle @Outsideness @ne0colonial Thats understandable. Its important to learn the lesson of the german Cameralists regardless.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637602426585878528

  • Legal dissent is is useful only in prohibiting the construction of a voluntary c

    Legal dissent is is useful only in prohibiting the construction of a voluntary commons if it imposes costs upon the extant assets of others.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:15:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637599502375985152

  • Majority Assent is helpful in the allocation of scarce resources to prioritized

    Majority Assent is helpful in the allocation of scarce resources to prioritized ends.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:14:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637599102688198656