Author: Curt Doolittle

  • a) natural law doesn’t change. B) they knowingly compromised to get signatures c

    a) natural law doesn’t change. B) they knowingly compromised to get signatures c) did their method of change survive?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-02 10:22:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/683231969556205568

    Reply addressees: @AppleCiderRadio

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628820677903036420


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628820677903036420

  • KNOWING THE SIGNALS OF THE END OF A RELATIONSHIP The duration of a relationship

    KNOWING THE SIGNALS OF THE END OF A RELATIONSHIP

    The duration of a relationship is ascertainable by the frequency of the display of the disgust response. People who love each other never do it. People who will come apart eventually demonstrate it by one person over contentious issues. People who display it in preferential issues are dead already and they wait only for better opportunity.

    A man must never feel a woman is ugly or harmful to him. A woman must never feel a man is weak and harmful to her.

    Some very well intentioned and seemingly moral people do not realize that their difficulty in creating and maintaining relationships is because they confuse abstract principles with personal relations.

    Disgust responses tell us that we are either immature, vain, ignorant, or self absorbed, or completely incompatible.

    We must love unconditionally. It is in business and politics that we must judge conditionally. But in interpersonal relations, love must be unconditional. If it is not or cannot be, then the relationship cannot be.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-02 06:54:00 UTC

  • If I am ruled by my betters under a condition of Liberty then I cannot think of

    If I am ruled by my betters under a condition of Liberty then I cannot think of a reason to object.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-02 05:18:00 UTC

  • (No internet for 18 hours. And I survived. Just barely. Sad. lol)

    (No internet for 18 hours. And I survived. Just barely. Sad. lol)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-02 05:16:00 UTC

  • Why are you blaming government when the problem is women?. Why blame guns when t

    Why are you blaming government when the problem is women?.

    Why blame guns when the problem is black urbanites?

    Equalitarianism is in the conservative an libertarian mind also.

    The problem is white women.

    White women destroyed the west. Jews just armed them. We failed to contain them.

    Every major disaster is pandora’s doing.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-02 04:29:00 UTC

  • TIME TO ABANDON RATIONALIST TOYS AND LEARN SCIENCE LIKE THE BIG BOYS. Jeff Tucke

    TIME TO ABANDON RATIONALIST TOYS AND LEARN SCIENCE LIKE THE BIG BOYS.

    Jeff Tucker is a good man but like Phillip argues as a justificationalist and a rationalist and not a scientist.

    I am not so concerned about defeating the arguments of moral men no matter how foolishly they are constructed.

    That their central premise is belief consisting of shoulds, and therefore our religion stated without reference to divinity is failure by demonstration of construction alone.

    While as a scientist the central premise is necessity consisting of articulated law, and identical in construction to all sciences by contrast is success by construction alone.

    That the thinkers of the twentieth century could not transition from justificationary moral rationalism to critical and necessary and scientific argument is the reason for the persistence of these rothbardian nonsense arguments consisting of little more than the Talmud’s separatism restated in the terminology of Anglo rationalism.

    I think I have reformed moral philosophy forever by providing what the twentieth century thinkers failed to.

    But just as Marxism persists because of its self referencing non correspondent justificationary literary form and overinvestment by advocates, rothbardianism likewise is a self referencing, non correspondent, justificationary literary, construction easy to access without substantial knowledge and subject to overinvestment by advocates.

    I mean I don’t expect Hoppe to abandon the fallacies of argumentation, the deductivity of aprioristic observation, the insufficiency of inter subjectivity, the irrationality of his community construction either since his self worth and status are predicated on these falsehoods rather than his insights into incentives that result from his constructions under the logic of property rights – which are flawless and correct Rothbard in many cases.

    These are good people doing the best that they can with the rationalist tools at their disposal, but they are hardly intellectual competitors.

    Iron Age argumentative weaponry in an era of crucible steel and explosives.

    Eras:

    1-Religion. Mysticism.

    2-Law. Rationalism.

    3-Credit. Pseudo scientism

    4-Digital Reputation. Science.

    Welcome to the new age. It is time for priests, rationalists, and philosophers, like children to give up their toys.

    Liberty is the product of the organised use of violence to suppress parasitism in all its forms, so that we may voluntarily produce commons of which liberty is the first.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-02 03:47:00 UTC

  • ( might have to do more testing but apparently Absolut vodka doesn’t set off sul

    ( might have to do more testing but apparently Absolut vodka doesn’t set off sulfite problems. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-01 08:33:00 UTC

  • Actually. Wanna do the world violent good? Spend a year researching some scumbag

    Actually. Wanna do the world violent good? Spend a year researching some scumbag in your free time, and figuring out how to end his reign of scumbagism. And do something about it either above board or below.

    Even if you did only one scumbag every two or three years, over the course of your lifetime you would change the world dramatically for the better.

    Get your testosterone and anger out in sports or the gym. Never discuss your hobby.

    Every man a warrior. Every man a Sheriff. Every man a Judge.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-01 04:48:00 UTC

  • Q&A: “CAN I BECOME A ‘MR WOLF?” JAMES BOND DOESN”T EXIST EITHER —“in the movie

    Q&A: “CAN I BECOME A ‘MR WOLF?” JAMES BOND DOESN”T EXIST EITHER

    —“in the movie Pulp Fiction there is a character played by Harvey Keitel who is referred to as the Wolf. Excepting the blatantly illegal stuff, how would a guy go about making himself this “fountain of utility” to men of sufficient power who require such an option?”—

    These men exist in law, public relations, finance, business, and politics. In business there is an entire class of CEO’s who ‘turnaround’ (clean up and sell) failed businesses. There are PR people who help actors and public people recover their images. In ever sector there are ‘cleaners’. We had a guy in my company that recovered blown customers who were mad at us. Some project managers specialize in project recovery. Some technologists in technology recovery. Some engineers who rescue ships. Some doctors who specialize in trauma.

    Where these people do not really exist, just like ‘hit men’ do not exist, is in the lower classes, where such things are to reality what myths are to reality: illustrations that we learn from.

    The evidence is in that the government doesn’t use spies it uses special forces to kill people. That there are no ‘cleaners’ in crime other than borderline lawyers. That there are few if any ‘hit men’,. Those that do exist are very rare, lead very bad lives, and are not someone you can seek to become. And moreover that the men who do usually kill are merely throwaways, and usually the dumbest guy that they can find, who they have the least regret in offing in order to preserve silence.

    The reason is that such people would be caught unless they were employed by an organization with sufficient work for them. And organizations of any scale have been under assault by the FBI since the 1930’s and particularly since the 1960’s.

    And moreover the economics prohibit it. Underground activity suppresses the option of scale by reputation. Above ground activity facilitates scale by reputation. Anonymity requires rather small organizations free of ‘leaking’. This means that a ‘market’ for services like those of ‘the cleaner’ do not exist. In fact, if we look at the data, the series CSI has done more to educate criminals in how to operate cleanly than any individual ever has.

    There is a longstanding tradition in hollywood to place middle class characters in lower class roles, and equally to place lower class characters in upper middle or upper class roles. This technique is always an interesting device for creating mythical characters.

    So, the way to do this is to literally study any area of inquiry and to learn to specialize in recovering failures rather than creating innovations.

    The Pinkerton organization does the closest to this kind of work on a professional and above board basis. They both act as corporate spies and they prevent corporate spying. (I have used them in the distant past both to conduct ‘research’ – espionage – and to prevent it. And it’s very common in R&D and legal organizations to do so.)

    Now, as a confession, I have taken down organizations run by:

    a) Elliot and Robert Koenig (racketerring), b) Stephen Golub (wire fraud), c) Wayne Seminoff (tax evasion), and now d) Rothbardianism(deception) (all jewish names you might note) for illegal or immoral activity. And there was a time that I considered making a career out of it because it suited my autistic hyper moralism and subconscious need for revenge. And that was why I joined the Justice department for a very short time.

    But I decided that I would rather not spend my life around bad people because it tended to make me angry, and I don’t particularly like hanging around scumbags and getting angry about it.

    So such things CAN be done. They are just not done at low levels of sophistication. they are done at high levels of sophistication.

    Reading a few rudimentary books on the ACTUAL operation of the law is pretty useful. After that you study how to recover projects that have failed. then just a little accounting. And then how to win friends and influence people.

    Then the trick is going and looking for the dirt. If you start looking for dirty people in this world it won’t take you that long to find them. 🙂

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-01 04:42:00 UTC

  • I need jack daniels. maybe vodka (Absolut). thank god there are good people here

    I need jack daniels. maybe vodka (Absolut). thank god there are good people here who will share hugs in an hour lol.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-31 16:20:00 UTC