Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Untitled

    http://www.onefunmom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/4-Mistaken-Purposes-Download.pdf


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-28 00:02:00 UTC

  • So, Johannes Meixner. Apparently I need to come visit you in Tallinn? Is that wh

    So, Johannes Meixner. Apparently I need to come visit you in Tallinn? Is that what you’re telling me? Gotta see the whole gang up there it seems.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-27 16:33:00 UTC

  • OF A SUDDEN” ARE YOU F’ING KIDDING ME? I’ve been writing about this issue every

    http://time.com/4195635/apple-earnings-call/”ALL OF A SUDDEN” ARE YOU F’ING KIDDING ME?

    I’ve been writing about this issue every 90 days since 2010.

    Apple is a one product company. The only way to survive is to go after the office. No other source of revenue that big that they can pivot toward.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-27 12:32:00 UTC

  • ( I have a female friend here who is beautiful, funny, smart, patient, educated,

    ( I have a female friend here who is beautiful, funny, smart, patient, educated, not lazy, is 27, and wants to raise a traditional family as a stay at home mom. And honestly, it’s freaking impossible to find someone for her. In the states she’d have so many options. Here, it’s hopeless. sigh. Needs a manly man. All my friends are geeks. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-27 10:30:00 UTC

  • Of course people know me. I find reasons to compliment them. I make sure they re

    Of course people know me. I find reasons to compliment them. I make sure they remember me. This is how you build lots of options in your community. That short man with the beard who is friendly? Yes I know him. Some people hate it. Natural politicians love it. Watch Clinton. He’s the master of it. I was like this all my life.

    Flip it around. How can you live in a town without making lots of friendly relationships?

    Small town people. We were raised this way. To acknowledge not ignore. To make people feel safe, not distance ourselves from them.

    To build a civic society. Not retreat from it.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-27 10:10:00 UTC

  • Q&A: How Does Propertarianism Address Spanking?

    [A]s an economy. “The Cost Is In The Maintenance” Testimonialism tells us that “There exist no general rules without limits”. So to say we should never spank or always do something else, is an ‘immature’ or perhaps ‘unsophisticated’ ethic. Lets look at the four properties. FIVE FACTORS 0) the category of violation: violence(physicality), crime(theft), ethics(deceit), manners(impulsivity), morals(externality), (please note the sequence). 1) time preference (long term consequences), 2) knowledge of alternatives, 3) time demands (urgent threat vs raising calmest child), 4) exhaustion and frustration levels of the parent. I suspect that merely mentioning these properties is enough for you to put it together. It’s not very complicated. DISCUSSION 1) whenever possible choose the long term consequences. The long term consequences are that harming( using violence against) your children for any reason produces long term consequences. There are times when children know they are out of line. I am not a prohibitionist. There must exist some limit. Physicality should be a limit, not a practice. Thats what the research shows and I am convinced by it. 2) it is actually just as effective in most cases to deprive a child of attention and stimulation. This is the preferred method today – in no small part because we have big enough houses. As I understand it the beneficial line of demarcation is physicality. Cursing at mother (mother must be sacred), or using physicality warrants physicality. Everything else warrants deprivation rather than physicality. Why? Because punishment gives the child attention, and your anger means he or she ‘wins’ by controlling you. In other words, if your child wants attention and can get it, then he is punishing you for not paying him enough attention. After physicality, the next standard is lying. I think most of the time lying is impulsive, and if impulsive then deprivation is enough. After lying s Premeditation. Premeditation is a very bad sign in a child (impulsivity requires only training). Premeditation is not quite as bad as killing animals, but a danger sign. Harming others or animals through premeditation means you have a candidate serial killer on your hands. This requires professional help. So if we are trying to train children to have higher time preference (escape impulsivity) then this is a matter for deprivation. If we are trying to train children out of impulsive physicality – then calm retaliation is probably warranted. If we are trying to train children out of premeditation – then it is more than a question of spanking, it is one of diagnosis of what is ‘wrong’ that is causing it. My mother used to make me stand in a corner. I merely spoke to my daughter and that was enough to change her behavior We sent my son to his bedroom. I have spanked my son once, but it did no good. I usually use a tap on the bottom and that is all it takes. But we are a gene pool and there are other gene pools. My father was excessively violent and I fucking hated him for it. Mostly because it was unnecessary. Making my mother unhappy with me was punishment enough. 3) Deprivation requires time. Contrary to popular belief, children sort of just came along through most of our history, are fairly fragile until they are seven or eight, and were exposed (killed) if unwanted, and often killed by nature if insufficiently provided and cared for. (history is full of families the majority of whose children did not survive). 4) Deprivation requires patience, and energy. Frustrated and tired parenting is very difficult. How one punishes is one of the best measures of time preference. But one’s capacity for time preference is determined by exhaustion and frustration. So people with good mental and physical condition, and who have long (low) time preference tend to be better parents than those with poor mental and physical condition, and high(short) time preference. CLOSING This is the ‘economy’ of child rearing. A child is not purchased and held as lumber or bricks, but constantly maintained like an orchard. So the cost is in the maintenance, not in the purchase. wink emoticon Cheers Curt

  • Q&A: How Does Propertarianism Address Spanking?

    [A]s an economy. “The Cost Is In The Maintenance” Testimonialism tells us that “There exist no general rules without limits”. So to say we should never spank or always do something else, is an ‘immature’ or perhaps ‘unsophisticated’ ethic. Lets look at the four properties. FIVE FACTORS 0) the category of violation: violence(physicality), crime(theft), ethics(deceit), manners(impulsivity), morals(externality), (please note the sequence). 1) time preference (long term consequences), 2) knowledge of alternatives, 3) time demands (urgent threat vs raising calmest child), 4) exhaustion and frustration levels of the parent. I suspect that merely mentioning these properties is enough for you to put it together. It’s not very complicated. DISCUSSION 1) whenever possible choose the long term consequences. The long term consequences are that harming( using violence against) your children for any reason produces long term consequences. There are times when children know they are out of line. I am not a prohibitionist. There must exist some limit. Physicality should be a limit, not a practice. Thats what the research shows and I am convinced by it. 2) it is actually just as effective in most cases to deprive a child of attention and stimulation. This is the preferred method today – in no small part because we have big enough houses. As I understand it the beneficial line of demarcation is physicality. Cursing at mother (mother must be sacred), or using physicality warrants physicality. Everything else warrants deprivation rather than physicality. Why? Because punishment gives the child attention, and your anger means he or she ‘wins’ by controlling you. In other words, if your child wants attention and can get it, then he is punishing you for not paying him enough attention. After physicality, the next standard is lying. I think most of the time lying is impulsive, and if impulsive then deprivation is enough. After lying s Premeditation. Premeditation is a very bad sign in a child (impulsivity requires only training). Premeditation is not quite as bad as killing animals, but a danger sign. Harming others or animals through premeditation means you have a candidate serial killer on your hands. This requires professional help. So if we are trying to train children to have higher time preference (escape impulsivity) then this is a matter for deprivation. If we are trying to train children out of impulsive physicality – then calm retaliation is probably warranted. If we are trying to train children out of premeditation – then it is more than a question of spanking, it is one of diagnosis of what is ‘wrong’ that is causing it. My mother used to make me stand in a corner. I merely spoke to my daughter and that was enough to change her behavior We sent my son to his bedroom. I have spanked my son once, but it did no good. I usually use a tap on the bottom and that is all it takes. But we are a gene pool and there are other gene pools. My father was excessively violent and I fucking hated him for it. Mostly because it was unnecessary. Making my mother unhappy with me was punishment enough. 3) Deprivation requires time. Contrary to popular belief, children sort of just came along through most of our history, are fairly fragile until they are seven or eight, and were exposed (killed) if unwanted, and often killed by nature if insufficiently provided and cared for. (history is full of families the majority of whose children did not survive). 4) Deprivation requires patience, and energy. Frustrated and tired parenting is very difficult. How one punishes is one of the best measures of time preference. But one’s capacity for time preference is determined by exhaustion and frustration. So people with good mental and physical condition, and who have long (low) time preference tend to be better parents than those with poor mental and physical condition, and high(short) time preference. CLOSING This is the ‘economy’ of child rearing. A child is not purchased and held as lumber or bricks, but constantly maintained like an orchard. So the cost is in the maintenance, not in the purchase. wink emoticon Cheers Curt

  • (thinking again) Complexity from simplicity. We are very poor at multivariate vi

    (thinking again)

    Complexity from simplicity. We are very poor at multivariate visualization. We can pursue a rabbit, or follow the flight of an arrow, but when it comes to multiple axis, we are pretty bad at it.

    Our emotions appear to be limited to small number of axis, but out of this small number arises an enormous variety of experiences.

    I know these four exist – the only novelty I’ve added is information processing bias.

    1 – Predatory/Dominance/Skeptical-Agreeable/Submissive/Fearful

    2 – Hyperactive/Excitable/impulsive-calm/Patient/slothful

    3 – Autistic/Analytic – Empathic/Solipsistic (information processing)

    4 – Agony/Pain/discomfort-pleasing/Pleasure/Joy

    If I work at it I have a hunch that all subsequent models can be described as the effect of multiple agents in the brain provoking these from each person’s ‘steady state’.

    The big five can be explained as provoking these four.Why? Because I want to test the theory that these are informaiton processing problems. Make sense? Yes it does. 😉 As such they can be explained as information rather than experience. So that’s why I”m working on it.

    THE BIG FIVE

    Extroversion-introversion

    Solipsistic/empathy – analyltic/autistic

    Experience(curious) – Familiarity(cautious)

    Impulsivity- Patience

    Confidence/Secure – Sensitive/nervous/Fearfulness

    RATIONALIZING….

    Neuroticism: negatively correlated with ratio of brain volume to remainder of intracranial volume, reduced volume in dorsomedial PFC and a segment of left medial temporal lobe, including posterior hippocampus, increased volume in the mid-cingulate gyrus.

    Extraversion: positively correlated with orbitofrontal cortex metabolism, increased cerebral volume of medial orbitofrontal cortex.

    Agreeableness: negatively correlated with left orbitofrontal lobe volume in frontotemporal dementia patients, reduced volume in posterior left superior temporal sulcus, increased volume in posterior cingulate cortex.

    Conscientiousness: increased volume of middle frontal gyrus in left lateral PFC.

    Openness to experience: no regions large enough to be significant, although parietal cortex may be involved.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-27 08:54:00 UTC

  • (is it really just cultural, or are ethnic slavs (poland-ukrainian) really that

    (is it really just cultural, or are ethnic slavs (poland-ukrainian) really that much calmer – less OCD than the germanic and celtic peoples? I wonder if there is any data on autism or testosterone by R1b vs R1a. That would seem very hard data to find.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-27 08:22:00 UTC

  • OVERSING UPDATE Well, “Deliverable Accounting” will be done today it seems. So l

    OVERSING UPDATE

    Well, “Deliverable Accounting” will be done today it seems. So lets say you make a deliverable (any container really). It can be a sprint for example, or a phase, or just a job, or just a milestone. And we track additions, subtractions and completions, producing the usual burn down charts etc.

    We are trying to avoid too-nerdy reports. The reason being that they produce rapidly diminishing returns and they aren’t tolerable for non-nerd users. We will see how it goes. Right now they’re very simple and we want to keep them that way.

    So now, that means there are two open issues:

    1) The reports (four of which are necessary, the rest can come out incrementally)

    2) Appointments/Reservations on the gantt chart.

    And bug bashing will continue through the beta program. We are still finding some little ones. Mostly permissions related I think.

    Cheers

    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-27 04:27:00 UTC