Curt Doolittle

Author: Curt Doolittle

  • TO NEW FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS I write controversial philosophy. If it was not con

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/dear-newbies-welcome-to-the-revolution/REMINDER TO NEW FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS

    I write controversial philosophy. If it was not controversial it would not be revolutionary. –

    And moreover, I embrace controversy as good marketing, and the good conduct of argumentative research.

    *** http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/01/18/yes-im-controversial-but-why/

    If my work is offensive, it means the person offended is a thief. That may seem an outrageous claim, but it will survive all criticisms. Truth is often painful.

    I don’t do racism, I do classism (eugenics). I’m for as diverse a planet of tribes as possible. And my understanding is that the differences between the races are almost entirely the product of differences in rates of reproduction of the lower classes.

    *** http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/?s=racism

    I don’t to statism I do nationalism. I don’t do anarchy, I do nomocracy (rule of law) under Natural Law, where my concept of natural law is not ‘fuzzy’ but thoroughly articulated.

    *** http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/?s=nomocracy

    I don’t do escape from the commons, I do market government for the construction of commons by exchange.

    *** http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/?s=market+government

    My work is not sentimental, not rationalistic, but social science hung on a philosophical framework, as a means of uniting science, philosophy, morality, and law.

    Propertarianism requires a great deal of general knowledge, and Testimonialism a great deal of understanding of philosophy and the philosophy of science, and possibly of the foundations of logic and mathematics.

    The current phase of my work addresses the problem of what we call religion, but better stated is the encoding of evolutionary strategy in a set of metaphysical value judgements, and their embodiment in myth, ritual, tradition and norms. So my current work is probably more accessible than the previous few years.

    My goal is to create a revolution that overthrows the Century of Lies and Mysticism (20th century).

    But moral men need more than just revolutionary sentiment. They need:

    1) Moral Authority : We have been lied to, our civilization destroyed, our culture intentionally undermined, and our kin and relations the subject of a slow constant conquest and genocide.

    2) A Solution : An alternative set of institutions that are capable of intertemporal persistence across many generations.

    3) A Plan of Transition : the means by which to convert from the current state to the new state so that individuals and groups can envision that transition rather than fear the uncertainty of it.

    4) A Method Of Revolution : The methods by which we raise the cost of the status quo until our solution is preferable to the current chaos.

    My work, my ‘book’, is an attempt to provide moral authority, A solution, A Plan of Transition, and a Method of Revolution.

    WELCOME TO THE REVOLUTION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/dear-newbies-welcome-to-the-revolution/

    SHORT COURSES IN PROPERTARIANISM

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/

    WE NEED 100 MEN WHO CAN ARGUE USING PROPERTARIAN AND TESTIMONIALIST ARGUMENTS.

    Because that is what it will take to generate sufficient discussion and awareness to cause a revolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 01:38:00 UTC

  • DOD Guys En Force: Ohio, Tennessee, Florida, Kansas. Uh huh. Don’t wanna give ou

    DOD Guys En Force:

    Ohio, Tennessee, Florida, Kansas. Uh huh.

    Don’t wanna give out information at all. lol.

    White boys. Soldiers. Warriors.

    You see, I love these men. I don’t disdain them. I don’t hold them in any kind of contempt.

    Like every liberal does.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 01:13:00 UTC

  • Spencer and Darwin were so close. Unfortunately mises, popper, hayek, brouwer, b

    Spencer and Darwin were so close. Unfortunately mises, popper, hayek, brouwer, bridgman, and poincare failed to carry them across the threshold.

    Why? Because the combination of women, marx, boaz, freud, created a sentimental alternative to truth – a great lie. And after the great war, keynes created a way to use consumption to recover from it, and the promise of something new to mask the regret of the catastrophe. In other words, we replaced art, heroism, and truth, with crass consumption and, proletarianism to hold the state together, an innumerate pseudoscience to systematize it, and postmodern lies to defend it all.

    I understand that we must produce a synthesis of truth and religion. This is the hardest objective to solve. Principally because men need costly rituals in order to defend the principles that they attest to.

    I understand how the previous century failed. I understand why the great lies succeeded in the post war era, for the same reason that christianity succeeded in the post-war and post-plaque era.

    I think I understand how to create that religion, philosophy, logic, and science.

    Please god give me strength, energy, time, and resources to do it.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 00:46:00 UTC

  • KNOW THYSELF Most of us must in the end rely upon introspective query of our acc

    KNOW THYSELF

    Most of us must in the end rely upon introspective query of our accumulated experience – all of which is framed by genetic influence. We confuse quite often the required skepticism of the scientist and the luxury of his indecision with the cautious pessimism of the warrior without the luxury of indecision and call it wisdom rather than mere luxury. This behavior is the philosophical bias of the unaccountable, not of truth. Others choose action given their sense of accountability. But whether choosing accountability or unaccountability is in itself a choice between action and inaction. Between decision and indecision. Between cost and cost evasion. All costs are opportunity costs. Time matters.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 00:30:00 UTC

  • ***”We agree to grant you equal rights in matters of property under the provisio

    ***”We agree to grant you equal rights in matters of property under the provision that you limit reproduction to kin, and create no moral hazard by bearing offspring that the rest of us must pay to raise and insure. Why? Because it is not necessary to grant you equal rights in any matter. It is merely beneficial for all of us if we do. But this benefit cannot come at the cost of our kin. Or it is of no benefit at all.”***

    (there we go)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-31 14:10:00 UTC

  • Ruining the Ukrainians with comfort food that is bad for you: 1) Breakfast: Carb

    Ruining the Ukrainians with comfort food that is bad for you:

    1) Breakfast: Carbonara

    2) Lunch: Primavera

    3) Dinner: Bolognese

    4) Bedtime Sweets: Cannoli

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-31 14:00:00 UTC

  • never believe me when I tell them about this

    http://bit.ly/1nTJNwJUkrainians never believe me when I tell them about this.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-30 15:04:00 UTC

  • Some clown has created a hookah handle that is bright pink and suggestably phall

    Some clown has created a hookah handle that is bright pink and suggestably phallic.

    Watching the five women at the table try to smoke it without looking like they are … is hysterical.

    And of course I need to ask them about technique …

    Two men. Five women. Correct ratio I think. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-30 14:44:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-30 13:31:00 UTC

  • IF MY WORK IS OFFENSIVE TO YOU, THEN YOU ARE A THIEF. I mean. It’s that simple r

    IF MY WORK IS OFFENSIVE TO YOU, THEN YOU ARE A THIEF.

    I mean. It’s that simple right? Truth hurts sometimes.

    Being called out as a thief is definitely unpleasant. Propertarianism and Testimonialism make your thievery visible. You’ve been caught. I understand that you don’t like being caught. I understand that thieves blame everyone else other than themselves.

    If my work is offensive then you’re just a thief. Sorry. Just how it is.

    If you don’t understand it, then you just don’t understand it. Your understanding is no more a measure of my work than your understanding of any other logical specialization. Incomprehension is not a criticism. Nor is complexity a criticism. There are many counter-intuitive complexities in human experience.

    If you think it’s incomplete, or could be better, well then, I agree with you. Its incomplete and it could be better.

    If you think my ambitions are unwise, well, then I acknowledge that possibility.

    But in my experience finding the work offensive is an attempt to preserve deceit and theft.

    The Transcendence of man requires that we clean our intellectual house, incrementally increase suppression of parasitism, and create great monuments to our success.

    We have likely passed peak human. Smaller brains, lower intelligence, higher aggression, and higher reproduction, can destroy mankind’s promise.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-30 06:13:00 UTC