(correct.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:50:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742015524366651766
Reply addressees: @Obediencio1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742014209045455251
(correct.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:50:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742015524366651766
Reply addressees: @Obediencio1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742014209045455251
What are the possible constitutions of the Divine?
1) External to the universe
2) The universe itself
3) A consequence within the universe
4) A consequence of the mind of man.
The observable laws of the universe whether physical (material) and natural (behavioral), evolutionary(over time), and formal(logical) are the same regardless of which manner in which the divine exists.
The only difference is whether organize societies and polities and federations to enforce those natural laws (behavioral) in the reality we exist, or whether in addition, we suspect that the divine will hold us accountable in the alternate reality we have faith may exist.
So, while we may each need different incentives, enforced by or rewarded by mankind, or enforced by fear of or anticipation of reward by the divine.
In the case of the latter we are still obligated to envorce those natural laws (behavior) for our mutual benefit, regardless of how an individual is incentivized to obey them.
Ergo it makes no difference to anyone other than the stories we tell ourselves to provide the incentive to follow the natura law of behavior (cooperation).
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:50:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742015417294462976
(women)
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:36:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742012002103390707
Reply addressees: @MindEnjoyer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742009975415677266
Is a post-supernatural christianity possible, preserving only deism and jesus as a philosopher-prophet?
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:36:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742011879654850990
Christianity was intolerant.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:34:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742011564603949078
Reply addressees: @NetheriteSpart1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742011334760264099
Yes it is. 😉 lol
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:10:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742005306593284424
Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742004154221150292
Christianity was imposed on the western empire because it was intolerant.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 01:47:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741999582140137548
Sorry for giving you the wrong impression. In the sense most of us would consider a discovery or proof a breakthrough, we’d likely mean solving one of the outstanding fundamental problems in cosmology. The person I’m quoting is referring to less meaningful results for the rest of us even if they are contributions that solidify the standard model.
The point of the quote is that institutional research is failing because it is intolerant of marginal ideas – even though the marginal ideas are the only breakthroughs we’ve seen.
Reply addressees: @joe_shipman
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 00:44:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741983708876337153
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741982864965816802
–“Over the past 50 years, why were almost all breakthroughs in fundamental and theoretical physics single author papers?”–
The answer is obvious:
1) organizations and incentives
2) mathiness without models
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-01 23:51:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741970483464073606
I’m a minor but well known public intellectual specializing in these matters. If Tim wants to talk to me he can. 😉 That’s what his platform is for. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-01 20:35:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741921106448044146
Reply addressees: @FatherIsTalking @Timcast @realJohnVictor @NatLawInstitute
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741914141982634221