OUR OWN JOHN VICTOR:
Building Tribe: 3 Important Principles https://youtu.be/FiyXBGzSecY?si=sOgha1Vzk-05XDK9
Response to our formation of local groups.
Watch it. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:45:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758261354463428686
OUR OWN JOHN VICTOR:
Building Tribe: 3 Important Principles https://t.co/B8FI6R1Cx6
Response to our formation of local groups.
Watch it. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:45:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758261354341756928
OVERTON WINDOW: IN THE ABSENCE OF UNIVERSAL FAMILY CONSTRUCTION WOMEN MOVE NATURALLY LEFT, MEN MOVE NATURALLY RIGHT
You may note that everyone is getting on board now with my explanations either directly, indirectly, or by their own eventual discovery, that men are moving right (responsibility) and women are moving left (irresponsibility) and that without the reciprocal compromise of marriage, for reasons whether economic, emotional, sex, reproductive, and late-age-care, the incentive to behave as other than a hyperconsumer with minimum burdent of civic responsibility, that reproduction is crashing.
Now I have a pretty good recipe for fixing it. But, how many people will give up crime in favor of productivity if they aren’t forced to, and how many people will give up hyperconsumption of the commons instead of production of commons if they aren’t forced to?
The only reasons humans have to cooperate are (a) family production (b) commons production that produce discounts on family production, (c) polities that produce discounts on the commons production that in turn produce discounts on family production.
If we do not put the family first, which will force the commons second, and the polity third, then we have no reason to cooperate at all other than to engage in the most massive tragedy of the commons since the fall of Rome.
The pill, no fault divorce, elimination of ‘marrying the state’, intergenerational redistribution instead of mandatory savings, and dozens of other follies have led to one obvious lesson:
There are four certainties in life: death, military service, taxes, and reproduction.
Otherwise there is no polity, commons, family or .. individual.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:43:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758260864375730178
You may note that everyone is getting on board now with my explanations either directly, indirectly, or by their own eventual discovery, that men are moving right (responsibility) and women are moving left (irresponsibility) and that without the reciprocal compromise of marriage,…
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:43:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758260475916091404
You may note that everyone is getting on board now with my explanations either directly, indirectly, or by their own eventual discovery, that men are moving right (responsibility) and women are moving left (irresponsibility) and that without the reciprocal compromise of marriage, for reasons whether economic, emotional, sex, reproductive, and late-age-care, the incentive to behave as other than a hyperconsumer with minimum burdent of civic responsibility, that reproduction is crashing.
Now I have a pretty good recipe for fixing it. But, how many people will give up crime in favor of productivity if they aren’t forced to, and how many people will give up hyperconsumption of the commons instead of production of commons if they aren’t forced to?
The only reasons humans have to cooperate are (a) family production (b) commons production that produce discounts on family production, (c) polities that produce discounts on the commons production that in turn produce discounts on family production.
If we do not put the family first, which will force the commons second, and the polity third, then we have no reason to cooperate at all other than to engage in the most massive tragedy of the commons since the fall of Rome.
The pill, no fault divorce, elimination of ‘marrying the state’, intergenerational redistribution instead of mandatory savings, and dozense of other follies have led to one obvious lesson:
There are four certainties in life: death, military service, taxes, and reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:42:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758260475769376768
RE: –“(Accusation:) Wolfrom has no theory”–
Demonstrably false. He has a theory of computation or what he would call another branch of mathematics. That theory appears successful in trial and error evolutionary computation of fundamental laws.
If he had not done it first,…
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:33:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758258227769205136
Reply addressees: @BreezeWhisp @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758163590065107165
RE: –“(Accusation:) Wolfrom has no theory”–
Demonstrably false. He has a theory of computation or what he would call another branch of mathematics. That theory appears successful in trial and error evolutionary computation of fundamental laws.
If he had not done it first, others would have. I know Joscha Bach and I have both stated we understood the need for this research program. Wolfram, as usual, is just ahead of the rest of us who are ahead of others so to speak.
For the spectrum, look at mainstream (math), wolfram (computation), fleming (operations) and you’ll see a spectrum of people trying to solve the problem using a spectrum of continuous to discrete operations.
And IMO, the mainstream is blocked because the universe is both (a) discrete and not continuous, and (b) consistent at all scales. Both the computationalists and the operationalists are working with discrete models. As far as I know this is the only possible method of producing a theory that is testable. There isn’t sufficient information in the mathematics to deduce a discrete construction – what we call ‘physics’. 😉
Even string theory, which I think I understand reasonably well, is likely a statistical artifact of the presumption of continuousness description, as an approximation of discrete operations at at least one if not two levels of additional disambiguation beneath the formulation – hence ten dimensions.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
cc: @stephen_wolfram
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:33:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758258227597205504
(Worth Repeating)
Again, this is one of the more important insights into western civilization and comparative civilization. Heroic Failure is lauded, as is Heroic Success. The only criticism is in failing to try heroism: responsibility for self, others, and commons. ;)… https://twitter.com/StephenThomasHC/status/1757928298594615454
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:18:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758254470004158634
Correct Answer:
Causality, as others have noted here, is attention seeking vs status seeking vs purity spiraling sequence in a world of alienation and decline of opportunity amidst the consequence of globalization (vs nationalism).
So these are all correct interpretations:
–“Increased competition and stratification of haves and have nots.”–@bizlet7
–“Subconscious attempt to minimize the effects of rapidly diminishing social mobility”–@dumbledrip
–“Perfectionism is closely correlated to anxiety and self doubt.”– @BallsInYaMe0wth
–“Global competition for labor”–@ryan_t_stull
–“Social Media…”– @yecchs
And dozens of others who have commented in this thread.
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 14:21:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758134459537268736
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757981115971707160
Facebook. From which I am (we are) banned.
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 14:08:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758131261128823014
Reply addressees: @GracianoGreen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758128786879467883